Section 8 Mtg. Tonight

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

   Mr. Adkins wants to discuss the Section 8 voucher qualifications tonight. In reading the article in the Journal, he offers two situations: 

1. People are moving to Middletown for the sole purpose of obtaining a voucher. They are attracted only by the free handout because this city has encouraged this type of thinking. We all know this.

2. Mr. Adkins will suggest giving working families vouchers even if they don't live in Middletown. 

#1 is the perverbial "put out the welcome mat for any and all "voucher driven people" to come to Middletown, creating a tidal wave of attraction for those not dealt with in other towns and placing a strain on the services offered by the city, not to mention the much discussed image issues of city poverty.

#2 is allowing people to come to Middletown in a "drive-thru" window situation, pick up their voucher in the "drive-thru" lane and leave town. And how does that work for the city? The city issues the voucher and then what, we turn them loose on some unsuspecting city? What does the city get for providing this "drive-by " voucher program? Is this a way of lessening the amount of "undeserving" people that are inundating the city now- issue vouchers to "more deserving" people who will immediately leave town?

Is either one of these scenarios good for this town? 

Neither attacks the real problem of too many vouchers to begin with. What are we doing to REDUCE the number issues Mr. Adkins? As discussed to death, we need those voucher numbers to be less than Hamilton's at 732, not 1500+ as we have now, right? How will we get there and how long will it take?

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
VietVet Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List MUSA Council Joined: May 15 2008 Status: Offline Points: 7008	Post Options Post Reply Quote VietVet Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Topic: Section 8 Mtg. Tonight Posted: Jul 20 2010 at 7:21am
	Mr. Adkins wants to discuss the Section 8 voucher qualifications tonight. In reading the article in the Journal, he offers two situations: 1. People are moving to Middletown for the sole purpose of obtaining a voucher. They are attracted only by the free handout because this city has encouraged this type of thinking. We all know this. 2. Mr. Adkins will suggest giving working families vouchers even if they don't live in Middletown. #1 is the perverbial "put out the welcome mat for any and all "voucher driven people" to come to Middletown, creating a tidal wave of attraction for those not dealt with in other towns and placing a strain on the services offered by the city, not to mention the much discussed image issues of city poverty. #2 is allowing people to come to Middletown in a "drive-thru" window situation, pick up their voucher in the "drive-thru" lane and leave town. And how does that work for the city? The city issues the voucher and then what, we turn them loose on some unsuspecting city? What does the city get for providing this "drive-by " voucher program? Is this a way of lessening the amount of "undeserving" people that are inundating the city now- issue vouchers to "more deserving" people who will immediately leave town? Is either one of these scenarios good for this town? Neither attacks the real problem of too many vouchers to begin with. What are we doing to REDUCE the number issues Mr. Adkins? As discussed to death, we need those voucher numbers to be less than Hamilton's at 732, not 1500+ as we have now, right? How will we get there and how long will it take?

Bobbie Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List MUSA Citizen Joined: Jun 05 2009 Location: Middletown Status: Offline Points: 288	Post Options Post Reply Quote Bobbie Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 20 2010 at 7:57am
	I am not an expert in Section 8 - don't want to be. But I would think that if we narrowed down offering vouchers to working families - could we possibly be setting ourselves up for discrimination suits? What about the handicapped or elderly? I would also think that since this is a federal program that there are guidelines you would have to follow, that a city would not be able to overwrite the guidelines. They need to focus on a plan to reduce, not redistribute. Offering to working families out of town is not a fix at all.

Pacman Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Prominent MUSA Citizen Joined: Jun 02 2007 Status: Offline Points: 2612	Post Options Post Reply Quote Pacman Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 20 2010 at 8:10am
	Bobbie what is the difference in giving working families a preference over giving residence of Middletown a preference? HUD has stated that in order to discuss a reduction in vouchers Middletown needs to get rid of the Middletown Citizen preference. Other PHA's operate in this manner. Parma where I take it most of these initiatives came from has about 700-800 vouchers with only 50-60 Section 8 Voucher holders living in the city. Folks this is about reducing the number of Section 8 Voucher holders living in Middletown. Some of these initiatives are being put in place to encourage Voucher Holders to MOVE outside of Middletown. Such as paying a higher rent if you take your voucher and move out of Middletown. Folks if this works it is a good thing. I just hope Council tonight doesn't make the wrong decision with this as they have in the past.

Bobbie Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List MUSA Citizen Joined: Jun 05 2009 Location: Middletown Status: Offline Points: 288	Post Options Post Reply Quote Bobbie Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 20 2010 at 9:25am
	Okay - I read it wrong - I did not realized that it was to live outside of Midd.

spiderjohn Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Prominent MUSA Citizen Joined: Jul 01 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2749	Post Options Post Reply Quote spiderjohn Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 20 2010 at 9:33am
	Seems to me, the intent of Mr.Adkins' report is to keep the # of vouchers in the local program, however shift the residency of the voucher-holders elsewhere. Pretty smart and cost-effective since this might keep the admin $$ here, while moving the bodies to another locale(avoiding the costs associated with these basically less productive/little to no income bodies). Seems to be what Pacman keeps referencing from the Parma situation. Anyone else read it this way?

swohio75 Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List MUSA Citizen Joined: Jun 13 2008 Status: Offline Points: 820	Post Options Post Reply Quote swohio75 Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 20 2010 at 9:45am
	I think all the proposed changes--along with the creation of a CRA (Community Reinvestment Area) in the downtown area with more potentially coming--is a step in the right direction.

Vivian Moon Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List MUSA Council Joined: May 16 2008 Location: Middletown, Ohi Status: Offline Points: 4187	Post Options Post Reply Quote Vivian Moon Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 20 2010 at 10:24am
	Spiderjohn – “Pretty smart and cost-effective since this might keep the admin $$ here, while moving the bodies to another locale(avoiding the costs associated with these basically less productive/little to no income bodies).” Spiderjohn This is the part of the program that I really don’t understand since the areas around us do not seem to have or want Section 8 housing. When all these current 700 Section 8 houses do not pass the new inspections laws where are all these people going to move to? How many Section 8 units are now available in the surrounding areas? (Butler and Warren county) Hmmm.... The City Council may pass this tonight....however....I just don't believe that HUD will allow the City to take these actions without a fight.

Pacman Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Prominent MUSA Citizen Joined: Jun 02 2007 Status: Offline Points: 2612	Post Options Post Reply Quote Pacman Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 20 2010 at 11:00am
	Vivian I really don't get you remarks on one hand you want to reduce Section 8 on the other you appear to want to keep it and all of its associated problems and issues. Where are you getting this 700 number at, Middletown can have up to 1662 Section 8 homes? The Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program is not based on how many Section 8 Units are available in Butler and Warren Counties. A Section 8 HCV holder can rent any home as long as the Landlord agrees to rent to a Section 8 HCV Holder and the unit can pass the inspections and is OK'd by HUD Standards. Personally I don't really care if the areas around us want any Section 8 Voucher Holders, time for them to step up to the plate. Hell many citizens in Middletown don't want an overabundance of Section 8 Vouchers either, but you seem to overlook that little matter.

Observer Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List MUSA Immigrant Joined: Dec 08 2009 Status: Offline Points: 46	Post Options Post Reply Quote Observer Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 20 2010 at 11:09am
	As I understand the issue HUD can't put up a fight against what the City is doing because the City is operating under the HUD rules. In my opinion the big issue here isn't how many Sec. 8 vouchers the city administers but rather how many Sec. 8 vouchers are used within the city limits. I think the plan that Mr. Adkins has laid out is a plan that could work.

Pacman Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Prominent MUSA Citizen Joined: Jun 02 2007 Status: Offline Points: 2612	Post Options Post Reply Quote Pacman Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 20 2010 at 11:23am
	Observer you are correct. The only people who can undermine this program is the City itself and from past experience I am not holding my breathe yet.

Mike_Presta Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List MUSA Council Joined: Apr 20 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3483	Post Options Post Reply Quote Mike_Presta Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 20 2010 at 6:13pm
	Apparently, they ARE "set up to take questions" tonight!!!
	“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012

TANGO Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List MUSA Resident Joined: Mar 21 2010 Status: Offline Points: 72	Post Options Post Reply Quote TANGO Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 20 2010 at 7:10pm
	Lets not forget that 2 of present council voted for the increase in vouchers. mayor and bill becker, Any thing done by persent council is better than past.

wasteful Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List MUSA Citizen Joined: Jul 27 2009 Status: Offline Points: 793	Post Options Post Reply Quote wasteful Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 20 2010 at 9:19pm
	Yeah Mike it seems when the topic is right and ...................................dialog is permitted. Otherwise you get the dead pan Zombie stare for 3 minutes.

spiderjohn Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Prominent MUSA Citizen Joined: Jul 01 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2749	Post Options Post Reply Quote spiderjohn Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 21 2010 at 10:17am
	A ? for Mr.A in regard to the inspection team being in-house. Apparently the newly-hired crew(great research job Council!) is not getting much done. Supposedly we can do this more efficiently in-house, though I read the chart as showing in-house to be more expensive. If, as Mr.A claims we can do this better with NEW city employees, and less expensively: Does his expense analysis also include health care coverage and retirement contributions? Would you re-hire former employees back at their former pay rates(or higher?) and re-establish their benefit program at the old level? Would they carry over or get more accrued time benefits? Would you hire NEW employees at a much lower starting pay rate, and place them at the beginning of the health care/retitement/accrued time program? Why would Mr.Mulligan and Mr.Becker strongly oppose recommended changes last year, then change to supporting the new program? They gave no explanations,however they may change their thinking due to recent developments(a concept unfamiliar to many here, who get everything correct first time around).

Bill Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List MUSA Citizen Joined: Nov 04 2009 Status: Offline Points: 710	Post Options Post Reply Quote Bill Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 21 2010 at 10:21am
	I find it hard to believe that doing anything in-house is more cost effective, as you said because of benefits, etc. The problem is monitoring the company you've hired and holding them accountable. Fire them if need be and bring in another firm!

Vivian Moon Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List MUSA Council Joined: May 16 2008 Location: Middletown, Ohi Status: Offline Points: 4187	Post Options Post Reply Quote Vivian Moon Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 21 2010 at 11:23am
	Spiderjohn Here's some food for thought.... Last year 1 man was doing ALL the inspections of Section 8 Housing as a subcontractor and you can bet he wasn’t making a salary like this….and he used his own car and gas..hmmmmm I will be posting more on this subject later today

spiderjohn Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Prominent MUSA Citizen Joined: Jul 01 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2749	Post Options Post Reply Quote spiderjohn Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 21 2010 at 8:27pm
	forget it.

Pacman Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Prominent MUSA Citizen Joined: Jun 02 2007 Status: Offline Points: 2612	Post Options Post Reply Quote Pacman Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 21 2010 at 9:43pm
	Just a few observations and questions. TIG was hired to do one type of Inspection HQS HUD Inspections for $140,000.00 a year if I remember correctly. How much more would it cost if you had them do Lead Based Paint Inspections, International Property Maintenance Code Inspections and HQS Inspections? That depends on if they are even certified to do the other inspections. Last year wasn't Consoc tasked with doing the inspections, now whether they farmed them out or did it themselves doesn't really matter. I believe their fee was in line with what is paid to TIG. TIG is paid about $35.00 for each scheduled inspection if the tenant is a no show. They have had about 225 so far this year, so figure on about 500 for the year. That is $17,500.00 that is wasted and can't be billed to the tenant per HUD. Wonder if the Inspections can be scheduled with the Landlord since they are benefiting from the rental and then if they are a no show they pay? I seriously doubt that Mr. Adkins is going through all of this to just pull the wool over the citizens eyes. Since Parma is the basic model for what is transpiring here, they also had a company doing the Admin of their program, as a matter of fact it was one of the Companies that was interviewed here. Parma eventually ended up taking over their own program. If this program pans out and the number of vouchers holders living in the city drops to about 400 it may be more feasible to bring the program in house, as it may no longer be financially feasible for an outside company to administer the program.. I say give this program some time to pan out. I believe Adkins said about 18-24 months to see some results. All of these assumptions about a hiring spree coming to city hall is just that for now assumptions. Don't miss the big picture here by creating conspiracies. The big picture is the reduction of Section 8 Voucher holders in the city and A reduction in the amount of Poverty in the city, this is a good thing for the city overall.

spiderjohn Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Prominent MUSA Citizen Joined: Jul 01 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2749	Post Options Post Reply Quote spiderjohn Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 22 2010 at 5:58am
	Let's hope that you are correct pacman Just wondering about a side situation to Mr.Adkins' plan, and you just never know how things will play out involving federal programs. Things like this usually don't change quickly. Controlling costs is always tricky, and can involve a lot of smoke,mirrors and "figures". As you say, a much smaller program would involve significantly less work(and workers).

Vivian Moon Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List MUSA Council Joined: May 16 2008 Location: Middletown, Ohi Status: Offline Points: 4187	Post Options Post Reply Quote Vivian Moon Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 22 2010 at 6:43am
	Spiderjohn"Could this play out that way, with no real significant decrease in Section 8 homes within the city?' Spiderjohn Yes and I believe this will be the final outcome several years from now. I do not believe HUD will let them reduce the vouchers. I hope to get a copy of the 11 page responce letter from HUD today. The City will fire TIG and bring all the inspection in-house this year then next year they will let CONSOC go and the entire program will be in-house.

Doug Adkins Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List MUSA Immigrant Joined: Jul 25 2009 Status: Offline Points: 17	Post Options Post Reply Quote Doug Adkins Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 22 2010 at 8:53am
	Spiderjohn - I'm very disappointed in your postings. This is for real. This is really happening. We WILL get this program back under control.
	Doug Adkins Community Revitalization Director

Vivian Moon Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List MUSA Council Joined: May 16 2008 Location: Middletown, Ohi Status: Offline Points: 4187	Post Options Post Reply Quote Vivian Moon Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 22 2010 at 9:12am
	Mr. Adkins Why do we now need 2 full time inspectors for Section 8 when just a year ago it was a one man job?

spiderjohn Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Prominent MUSA Citizen Joined: Jul 01 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2749	Post Options Post Reply Quote spiderjohn Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 22 2010 at 9:43am
	Understand your feelings, Mr.Adkins. I appreciate the tremendous amount of work you have invested in this project, and agree with your direction completely. However, the citizens have been burned repeatedly by promises and programs from(and for)Admin. Granted--mostly b4 your time. Hopefully you understand my skepticism, agree or not. I have no reason to doubt your effort and integrity, though things seldom go exactly as planned(especially when the Fed stands between local goals). Welcome to our world of disappointment. Council and Admin have disappointed the majority of citizens for years with their policies drafted and implemented behind closed doors and with little to no public input or information. Not to mention years of self-centered policy and conduct. Many city employees are fairly new and have never lived in this city or experienced the last 30 years of policy. Sometimes, you need to step back and understand the perception and experience of the long-term citizen and business community. In your case, you have laid it on the table for everyone to see and understand in advance. Much credit to you and this new open policy. I have to credit our new Councilmembers + Ms.Scott Jones for helping to bring this policy along. Best of luck implementing your new policy. If done as stated, followed by the desired results, I applaud your efforts and am greatly appreciative of your work for the community.

Doug Adkins Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List MUSA Immigrant Joined: Jul 25 2009 Status: Offline Points: 17	Post Options Post Reply Quote Doug Adkins Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 22 2010 at 9:48am
	Because in our opinion Consoc wasn't doing the inspections thoroughly allowing very poorly maintained units to pass inspection. We took inspections away to clean up the process and force landlords to be compliant with the property maintenance requirements. Almost 70% of the inspections have failed this year as we require the landlords to bring their properties back up to standards. We also initiated enhanced criminal screening to better catch problem criminals "before" they get onto the program. Those enhanced background checks started this month. I'm probably going to get raked over the coals again but Pacman is right. At some point you all have to stop looking for and creating conspiracies and deal with the particular issue at hand. Council asked me to prepare a plan to get control of the program. The plan was presented and put on the website for public review. The individual points, good and bad, have been discussed openly by Council and by the public at large. Council approved by a 7-0 vote to accept all of the recommended changes and I am drafting the remainder of the Admin Plan to implement each of those changes. If you disagree with any or all of the changes, I respect a difference of opinion. To suggest that this is some type of money grab after all of the work put into this by Staff and Council is flatly untrue and counterproductive. The citizens, including the contributors to this blog, have clamored for change in the Section 8 program. Now that we're doing it, half of you are creating conspiracies as to how we don't really mean it. Don't let your message get lost in the rhetoric.
	Doug Adkins Community Revitalization Director

VietVet Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List MUSA Council Joined: May 15 2008 Status: Offline Points: 7008	Post Options Post Reply Quote VietVet Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Jul 22 2010 at 10:29am
	Mr. Adkins: Fair enough. If this plays out as you say, I would think that you should be prepared to receive acknowledgement from us. If this plays out to be altered to reflect the "conspiracy" theory" as some have talked about, be prepared to have these comments thrown back at you with the anticipated venom attached. You must expect that type of response from us as we take no prisoners when we believe we have been given a line of crap by this city government. It is a logical, skeptical response, based on past history from city leaders and their message to the people. JMO