Middletown Ohio


Find us on
 Google+ and Facebook


 

Home | Yearly News Archive | Advertisers | Blog | Contact Us
Sunday, November 24, 2024
FORUM CITY SCHOOLS COMMUNITY
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Middletown's Offensive Play Calls
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Middletown's Offensive Play Calls

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
VietVet View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7008
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VietVet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Middletown's Offensive Play Calls
    Posted: Sep 23 2011 at 6:21am
Watched the game last night. Middletown's defense did a great job but gave up too much size and eventually wore out. At times, unable to stop Colerain's running game. At times, they did stop it. The pass defense looked good.

I question the play calling on the offensive side of the ball. It was apparent, Middletown's running game had a hard time gaining one or two yards the whole game. Yet, time and time again, the offensive play called for carries up the middle, where Colerain's defense appeared to be the strongest. I saw no sweeps, I saw few option outside....most plays were contained within the O line.

What I did see is that the weakness of Colerain's defense was the defensive backfield, especially the pass defense. (You can beat Colerain with a good passing game IMO). It was basically non-existent. Middletown had two excellent pass plays from Marshall to #16 for scores. That was it. I just don't see why play after play, the play calls were for running the ball for losses or small gains and the O coordinator didn't exploit the Colerain pass coverage more. Marshall and the gang were frustrated. Middletown's passing game looked more successful than the running game. IMO, should have been used more. JMO

Back to Top
gemneye70 View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident


Joined: Mar 10 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 83
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gemneye70 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Sep 27 2011 at 1:13pm
Agree.  I thought they should have passed more.  I liked the spread offense better than the option.  Some of the best plays last year was a QB sweep out of the shotgun formation...Marshall and the RBs had no room to run...DL was in the backfield immediately.
Back to Top
VietVet View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7008
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VietVet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Sep 27 2011 at 3:12pm
Good observations gemneye. Someone should mention the spread to Coach Everhart. Might give the offense an advantage using Marshall's/E.J.Junior's speed and room to run. Not as much defensive containment that way as you mentioned happened in the Colerain game. Don't understand the mentality of repeatedly running up the middle, especially when the O line is smaller than a packed in D line, when speed negates size to the outside. Time to exploit your opponent with speed Mr. Everhart. Time to get inventive and mix it up a little too. Get #16 involved more other than 25-40 yard pass plays. (flanker screens with decent blocking) Let's hurt that other team with our speed. JMO
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.164 seconds.
Copyright ©2024 MiddletownUSA.com    Privacy Statement  |   Terms of Use  |   Site by Xponex Media  |   Advertising Information