 |
|
| Home | Yearly News Archive | Advertisers | Blog | Contact Us |
|
 |
Monday, May 13, 2024 |
|
Here They Come! |
Post Reply 
|
Page <123 |
| Author | |
TonyB 
MUSA Citizen 
Joined: Jan 12 2011 Location: Middletown, OH Status: Offline Points: 631 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Posted: Feb 06 2012 at 10:14am |
|
Mr. Shaffer,
Sorry for butchering your name in the above post. |
|
 |
|
|
Vivian Moon
MUSA Council 
Joined: May 16 2008 Location: Middletown, Ohi Status: Offline Points: 4187 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Feb 06 2012 at 11:24am |
|
Mike Presta - But won’t land values be going way UP…now that we will be having a SECOND Community Improvement Corporation competing for the properties??? |
|
|
|
|
Smartman
MUSA Citizen
Joined: Jun 14 2008 Status: Offline Points: 299 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Feb 06 2012 at 11:48am |
|
Tony B, At this time I could not support phase 2 due to no auditorium. MHS has one of the best auditoriums in the GMC. It seats more, and the stage is nuch larger as is the set construction area. It serves no purpose to build a new HS and the bus students to another facility to rehearse.
|
|
|
|
|
TonyB
MUSA Citizen
Joined: Jan 12 2011 Location: Middletown, OH Status: Offline Points: 631 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Feb 06 2012 at 1:56pm |
|
Smartman,
I agree that the stage at the current MHS is one of the best in the area. My suggestion was for the option to build a new HS bldg. If they stay at their current location, then what I proposed would be unnecessary. |
|
|
|
|
VietVet
MUSA Council
Joined: May 15 2008 Status: Offline Points: 7008 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Mar 16 2012 at 6:37am |
|
Now, wait a minute!!!!
Today's Journal..... District seeks input on 5 construction options for high school, middle school Architects present five plans to district’s facilities panel, public MIDDLETOWN — The turnout may have been small but the information gathered could prove to be a big help as Middletown City Schools updates its master plan for secondary schools. During two community forums Thursday, about 20 people provided input to the district’s facilities committee and architects with Celina-based Fanning Howey. Five options for Phase 2 Master Plan to renovate or construct new middle and high schools were presented; those in attendance voted on their most-favored choices. • Option 1: Cost $69 million to build a new high school and remodel the current high school for grades sixth through eighth. • Option 2: Cost $62 million to build a new middle school for grades sixth through eighth and renovate and expand the high school to add 60,000-square-feet. • Option 3: Cost $49 million to build a middle school for grades seventh and eighth, and renovate and expand the high school. • Option 4: Cost $54 million to build a new high school and a new middle school for grades seventh and eighth. • Option 5: Cost $55 million to build a school for grades seventh through ninth and renovate the high school. EVERY ONE OF THESE OPTIONS ARE TO BUILD NEW SCHOOLS. ISN'T THERE AN OPTION TO RETAIN WHAT WE HAVE AND USE THE MONEY TO UPGRADE WHAT WE HAVE? THIS IS A "LOADED DICE" SCENARIO. NO MATTER WHAT DIRECTION THEY GO, SOME NEW SCHOOL IS GOING TO BE BUILT AT SOME LEVEL SOMEWHERE. THEY CAN'T CONVINCE ANYONE YET THAT THE NEW ELEMENTARIES HELPED THIS DISTRICT, MUCH LESS SUGGEST WE BUILD MORE. I KNEW THEY WERE HEADED THE NEW SCHOOL ROUTE BEFORE ANY OF THIS STARTED. 74% PAID BY THE PEOPLE AND ONLY 26% PAID FOR BY THE STATE? NOT A VERY GOOD BREAKOUT, IS IT? BAD TIME TO BE ASKING ANYONE FOR MONEY FOLK. GOOD LUCK IN GETTING THIS PASSED IF IT GOES BEFORE THE VOTERS. |
|
|
|
|
acclaro
Prominent MUSA Citizen 
Joined: Jul 01 2009 Status: Offline Points: 1878 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Mar 16 2012 at 8:19am |
|
The School Board and its leadership have lost complete and all credibility. Of 5 options, not one was to simply upgrade buildings. It was either build one, upgrade another, or build two new ones. The firm wants to build, they make more money. How outrageous. And to use this as the argument:“
"Buildings are important factors to attracting families to the community, increasing performance of students, reducing absenteeism,” said Stephen Wilczynski, executive director of Fanning Howey. If that is the case, as the elementary schools therefore failed, there is NO justification for this. I have been in contact and a Committee is being formed, to solicit the paid consultation of the man in West Chester that leads the charge against their school levies. He was on WLW 700 yesterday, and really takes a no prisoner attitude towards such waste, and is very well versed in defeating school levies. Bring it on BOE, this one is going to fail. |
|
|
|
|
Bill
MUSA Citizen
Joined: Nov 04 2009 Status: Offline Points: 710 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Mar 16 2012 at 9:20am |
|
Would this be the same kook is just left the NoLakota group for his offensive, cowboy rantings?
|
|
|
|
|
acclaro
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Joined: Jul 01 2009 Status: Offline Points: 1878 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Mar 16 2012 at 10:02am |
|
NoLakota organization support? Yes.
The man whom wrote the blog about dumb wives voting for levies without any business acumen and husbands sticking $100.00 bills in purse? No. |
|
|
|
Topic Options|
Post Reply
|
Page <123 |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.
| Copyright ©2024 MiddletownUSA.com | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Site by Xponex Media | Advertising Information |