Middletown Ohio


Find us on
 Google+ and Facebook


 

Home | Yearly News Archive | Advertisers | Blog | Contact Us
Monday, November 25, 2024
FORUM CITY SCHOOLS COMMUNITY
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Cost Conscious, Effective Uses of NSP-1 Funds??
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Cost Conscious, Effective Uses of NSP-1 Funds??

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Nelson Self View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident
Avatar

Joined: Aug 17 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 144
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nelson Self Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Cost Conscious, Effective Uses of NSP-1 Funds??
    Posted: Aug 10 2010 at 10:46am
NOTE:  The following are e-mail communications I had with HUD Washington, D.C. staff and Ginger Smith regarding the pre-submission content of the City's $2.144 Million NSP-1 grant application sent to the HUD Columbus Field Office on 11/15/2008.  It presented a well thought-out, much more productive plan to assist up to 75 first-time buyers (not the 11 now stated by City staff)!  My strategy fell on the deaf ears of senior City staff resulting in the today's direct, ineffective dabbling in the real estate market by the City.  You be the judge as to the costs/benefits of both.
 
From:  Self, Nelson
Sent:  Monday, October 27, 2008 8:12 PM
To:  Smith, Ginger L
Subject:  Neighborhood Stabilization Program - Sample Funding Allocation
 
NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM SAMPLE FUNDING ALLOCATION
 
A)   Foreclosure-Based Homebuyer Purchase/Rehabilitation Initiative
 
      1)  Down Payment & Closing Cost Assistance               $  450,000
           (Assist 75 Homeowners @ $6,000 Each)
 
      2)  Property Rehabilitation Assistance                          1,125,000*
           (Assist 75 Homeowners @ $15,000 Each)
 
B)   Targeted Residential Property Demolition Initiative
 
       1)  Clearance of Blighted/Dilapidated Structures                              400,000
            (Remove 50 Structures @ $8,000 Each)
 
C)    Program Administration/Legal/Contingency
 
       1)  Temporary Personnel                                                               124,000
            (Housing Rehabilitation & Clerical)
 
       2)  Additional Home Buyer Education & Credit Counseling                 20,000
            (LifeSpan, Inc.)
 
       3)  Additional Legal                                                                        25,000
            (Title Searches, Contract Documents Preparation, Etc.)
   
*  Additional funds available through HOME Program, Owner-Occupied Housing Rehab Revolving Loan Fund and potential Federal Home Loan Bank resources.
 
From:  Self, Nelson [mailto:nelsons@cityofmiddletown.org]
Sent:  Thursday, October 30, 2008 12:40 PM
To:  NSP Questions
Subject:  City of Middletown, Ohio - More NSP Questions
 
Scenario #1:  Is it permissible for the City of Middletown to provide NSP funds to bankable, income-eligible households for down payment/closing costs plus housing rehabilitation assistance via the FHA 203(k) Program?  Assume that up to $21,000 in NSP funds are provided for DPA (up to $6,000) and housing rehabilitation (up to $15,000) as a repayable, very low-interest second mortgage in conjunction with a market rate bank first mortgage of say $68,000.
 
Scenario #2:  Assume that the housing rehabilitation component of Scenario #1 cannot be funded through NSP.  Therefore, would it be permissible to provide NSP down payment/closing cost assistance (soft second $6,000 loan) to bankable, income-eligible households utilizing market rate FHA 203(k) purchase/rehabilitation mortgages?
 
Your assitance will be appreciated.
 
Nelson Self, Senior Planner
Community Revitalization Department
One Donham Plaza
Middletown, Ohio 45042
(513) 425-7942
(513) 425-7921 fax
 
From:  NSP Questions [mailto:nsp-questions@hud.gov]
Sent:  Friday, October 31, 2008 9:55 AM
To:  Self, Nelson
Subject:  RE: City of Middletown, Ohio - More NSP Questions
 
Dear Nelson
 
There is no problem with the scenario you describe from the NSP standpoint.  We are not FHA experts, but the people who have spoken about this at conferences seem to support it.  I don't know if it's the 203(k) program, but one FHA program requires that the house meet code while lender only want to sell as-is.  If what you describe bridges the gap, great.  If not, an intermediary like a non-profit housing developer might fill it.  Obviously, you would have to meet the affordability terms you set (at least equal to HOME Program periods) and securitize the financing to recapture program income down the road.  It sounds like you are on top of that, but we remind people before it's too late.
 
If FHA and the lender can support this, NSP can also.  If this is not an accurate or complete answer, let me know.
 
Best of luck.
 
John Laswick
CPD Specialist
202-401-4521
 
From: Self, Nelson
Sent:  Monday, November 03, 2008 8:05 AM
To:  Smith, Ginger L
Cc:  Kyle Fuchs
Subject:  FW: City of Middletown - More NSP Questions
 
Ginger -
 
Good news!  It appears that it's permissible for the City of Middletown to use NSP funds for down payment and closing cost assistance to households purchasing vacant, foreclosed properties.  Perhaps more importantly, it also appears that the City can provide NSP-based down payment and closing cost assistance plus housing rehabilitation funding to assist households purchasing vacant, foreclosed properties via an FHA 203(k) or equivalent program.
 
Should the above options be available to the City, it would preclude the time-consuming process of acquiring properties, rehabilitating same, and then marketing these rejuvinated homes for sale.
 
Nelson Self, Senior Planner
Community Revitalization Department
One Donham Plaza
Middletown, Ohio 45042
(513) 425-7942
(513) 425-7921 fax
Back to Top
Nelson Self View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident
Avatar

Joined: Aug 17 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 144
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nelson Self Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 10 2010 at 11:17am
As per the City's website and a NSP-1 financial spreadsheet obtained from the Neighborhood Revitalization Department by a MiddletownUSA participant, it certainly appears that:
 
1)  the City will substantially miss the mark in expending/commiting funds in 18 months from the date of grant award in 2009; and,
2)  look for Neighborhood Revitalization Department staff  to request an extension of time from the HUD Columbus Field Office in committing presently unobligated funds.
 
Maybe this is one reason why up to $230,000 is being lavished on the purchase or certain residential properties?
 
Just speculating out loud.
Back to Top
Hermes View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: May 19 2009
Location: Middletown
Status: Offline
Points: 1637
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hermes Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 10 2010 at 11:54am
Nelson - While I greatly appreciate all the info you provide and your knowledge in your opinion who or what group of people do you think benefits from what the city is doing or not doing with federal funds ?
 
If your uncomfortable posting your thoughts just send me a private note on this sight.
 
If you have read any of my postings here you probably know what I'm refering to being the pessimist I am.
No more democrats no more republicans,vote Constitution Party !!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.152 seconds.
Copyright ©2024 MiddletownUSA.com    Privacy Statement  |   Terms of Use  |   Site by Xponex Media  |   Advertising Information