Middletown Ohio


Find us on
 Google+ and Facebook


 

Home | Yearly News Archive | Advertisers | Blog | Contact Us
Wednesday, November 27, 2024
FORUM CITY SCHOOLS COMMUNITY
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Street Sweeper
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Street Sweeper

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
jag123 View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident
Avatar

Joined: Nov 05 2009
Location: Middletown
Status: Offline
Points: 143
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jag123 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Street Sweeper
    Posted: Jun 09 2011 at 2:51pm
Did anyone notice in the City Manager's Upate to Council, that she is for spending more money on contracting street sweeping, rather than the lower cost of buying a new sweeper? I thought we were trying to save money.  Ermm
Back to Top
Neil Barille View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident


Joined: Jul 07 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 238
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Neil Barille Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jun 09 2011 at 3:41pm
we can contract out street sweeping but apparently not other functions.  ???
Back to Top
acclaro View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jul 01 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1878
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote acclaro Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jun 09 2011 at 3:57pm
Did not the city spend hundreds of thousands on a paving machine to pave the streets from the residents whom petitioned to have their streets paved, which the city has a duty as part of taxation, and which to my knowledge, no neighborhood has come forward to accept this most generous offer, which would be unconstitutional to have residents vote to pay for a service the city is supposed to provide, while diverting those funds to use for payroll, and outsource/ contract the services for street repair? Hence, the city is contracting out the service which is fundamental to its service offering---street sweeping, and uses capital expenditiyres to buy equipment for a street resurfacer which the city is not repaving roads as it should, but based upon a majority vote within a neighborhood, which to date, no neighborhood has taken them up on this incredibly generous offer (I joke). Any wonder census is down about 5,000 people, and 74% of kids in town are eligible for free lunches during school and summer. No wonder they want to close Sunset, the % having money to pay even .25 would seem to be minimal, and the others are swimming at Brown's Run and Wildwood. An example of continued insane acquisitions and motives.  
Back to Top
Mike_Presta View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: Apr 20 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3483
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mike_Presta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jun 09 2011 at 4:01pm
Originally posted by jag123 jag123 wrote:

Did anyone notice in the City Manager's Upate to Council, that she is for spending more money on contracting street sweeping, rather than the lower cost of buying a new sweeper? I thought we were trying to save money.  Ermm

Actually, this is probably a smart move.

Operating equipment such as street sweepers on the third-world, bombed-out streets of our city must lead to high breakdown rates and excessive maintenance costs!!! LOL LOL LOL

“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
Back to Top
chmoore View Drop Down
MUSA Immigrant
MUSA Immigrant


Joined: Jun 07 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 17
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote chmoore Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jun 10 2011 at 9:40am
What might be the explanation for the Aberdeen and Bellemonte resurfacing fiasco?  Last summer they did a great job of repaving these two streets.  Then, the contractor put down a double yellow stripe on Bellemonte from Milton to Elmo, which common sense said not to do, then they scarified the yellow line which looked hideous. Now another contractor has patched large areas on both streets and the end result is a newly paved/patch work street.  Hopefully, someone with the City that was in charge of this lost his job.  It wasn't that big of a project.
c.h. moore
Back to Top
ground swat View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen


Joined: Mar 31 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 367
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ground swat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jun 10 2011 at 1:31pm
Thickness issues along with certain parts pitched wrong for proper drainage. What was the city rep. doing during this process last fall other than sitting in his truck.
Back to Top
middletownscouter View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Oct 11 2010
Location: Sunset Park
Status: Offline
Points: 501
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote middletownscouter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jun 13 2011 at 8:30am
Probably looking at Sunset pool dreaming about getting to demolish it, since the city has had a strong desire to do that for some time now.

Absolutely shameful that we have to waste our money fixing poor workmanship on a brand new street, but can't open the city's only pool for one summer even with $18k sitting there earmarked for that purpose.
Back to Top
VietVet View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7008
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VietVet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jun 14 2011 at 7:09am
Whoops, another "missed opportunity" to save some city taxpayer money....

Journal story...

Street sweeping may cost $38K more
City delayed purchase of a sweeper.

MIDDLETOWN — Hesitation over the purchase of a new city street sweeper could end up costing taxpayers nearly $38,000

At an April 19 meeting, the four City Council members in attendance — Bill Becker, A.J. Smith, Dan Picard and Tom Allen — voted to table the purchase of a new $ 170,793 street sweeper due to budget concerns. At the time the city was looking at a $3.7 million deficit and did not have options for how to fill that gap.

ATTA BOYS! Three options here. Buy new and spend money the city doesn't have. Buy a used one from another city and rehab it at a potential lower cost than buying new. Or, have the broken parts machined to repair the broken street sweeper currently owned by the city, certainly less expensive than buying new.

The city budgeted $172,000 to buy the new sweeper, meant to replace one of two vehicles that was out of service for much of last year due to mechanical issues, said Public Works Director Dave Duritsch.

CAN'T FIND ANYONE TO MACHINE SOME NEW PARTS? CAN'T GET ON THE INTERNET AND LOCATE THE SAME MODELS AND STRIP SOME NEEDED PARTS OFF THE ONES IN THE "JUNKYARD"? MOST PEOPLE WHO ARE ON A TIGHT BUDGET FIX UP THEIR VEHICLES RATHER THAN BUYING NEW. PROBABLY WON'T COST THE $172,000 THAT YOU WERE ORIGINALLY PLANNING ON SPENDING, RIGHT?

Back to Top
Middletown29 View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen


Joined: Mar 30 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 474
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Middletown29 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jun 14 2011 at 8:26am
Hows does Duritsch know it would cost more to contract out street sweeping? Have they requested bids and compared the cost of contracting with doing it with public workers.

I find it hard to believe the City can do it cheaper then a private contractor. Prove it Duritsch!!!!!
Back to Top
acclaro View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jul 01 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1878
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote acclaro Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jun 14 2011 at 11:01am
We continue to live in the world of Oz. City uses street sweeper and streets as a political crutch. No street sweeper because of upcominf vote on taking back tax rate, so the street sweeper is held "hostage" although it is federally mandaed by EPA, other fed entities associated with storms. In reality, liquidation of the sweepers owned, the personnel (FTE's) that drive them, and the non expenditure of capital would cost less by outsourcing to West Chester, than buying a new one, buying a used one, or buying a salage one for retrofit parts. Maybe they could get the guy that cleans Kroger's lot to do it cheaper or Superior Blacktop would buy one and do it for $16.20 per mile.
 
How many cars would bought last year, knowing what the fyure held? Several. Just politics, using a street sweeper   to remind voters, about all those great services that might go away. Middletown is in a league of its own, and so is its leadership, or lack of.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.099 seconds.
Copyright ©2024 MiddletownUSA.com    Privacy Statement  |   Terms of Use  |   Site by Xponex Media  |   Advertising Information