STRAND THEATRE DEMOLITION & $2,144,000 NSP-1 GRANT

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

To:  Mike Presta, Viet Vet, Pacman, Miss Vivian, Spider John, Impala SS, Gary Barge, Joshua Laubach, John Soppanish, Etc.

About one year ago Ginger Smith and her Illinois-based HUD consultant provided details to the City Council on the $2,144,000 Neighborhood Stabilization Program - Round One (NSP-1) grant application that was to be submitted no later than November 15th.  As public records will show, this "HUD Stimulus" funding was proposed to:  demolish approximately 54 residential properties; acquire, rehabilitate and resell approximately 20 vacant, foreclosed homes; provide downpayment/closing cost assistance for the purchasers of the 20 homes previously mentioned, and for program administration.  In no instance was there any mention of NSP-1 funds being utilized for demolition of downtown commercial properties such as the former Strand Theatre.

Was there an "amendment" to this RESIDENTIAL FORECLOSURE PREVENTION application that we might not be aware of?? 

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
Nelson R. Self Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List MUSA Citizen Joined: Oct 03 2009 Status: Offline Points: 279	Post Options Post Reply Quote Nelson R. Self Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Topic: STRAND THEATRE DEMOLITION & $2,144,000 NSP-1 GRANT Posted: Oct 18 2009 at 7:02pm
	To: Mike Presta, Viet Vet, Pacman, Miss Vivian, Spider John, Impala SS, Gary Barge, Joshua Laubach, John Soppanish, Etc. About one year ago Ginger Smith and her Illinois-based HUD consultant provided details to the City Council on the $2,144,000 Neighborhood Stabilization Program - Round One (NSP-1) grant application that was to be submitted no later than November 15th. As public records will show, this "HUD Stimulus" funding was proposed to: demolish approximately 54 residential properties; acquire, rehabilitate and resell approximately 20 vacant, foreclosed homes; provide downpayment/closing cost assistance for the purchasers of the 20 homes previously mentioned, and for program administration. In no instance was there any mention of NSP-1 funds being utilized for demolition of downtown commercial properties such as the former Strand Theatre. Was there an "amendment" to this RESIDENTIAL FORECLOSURE PREVENTION application that we might not be aware of??

Nelson R. Self Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List MUSA Citizen Joined: Oct 03 2009 Status: Offline Points: 279	Post Options Post Reply Quote Nelson R. Self Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: Oct 18 2009 at 7:21pm
	MiddletownUSA Post: 22 May 2009 at 2:56 pm *A BETTER USE OF $2.144 MILLION IN HUD NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM FUNDS???* *Good Afternoon Judy (Gilleland)* - In view of concerns raised by three City Council members plus some local housing industry professionals regarding Middletown's proposed use of $2.144 million in HUD Neighborhood Stabilization Program - Round One (NSP-1) funds, I again present this alternative recommendation. It was presented by me to senior Community Revitalization Department staff last October more than two weeks before the HUD submission deadline. Sadly, it was ignored by a now retired senior staff person. First of all, the proposal that CRD staff and their paid consultant concocted does put the City of Middletown in the real estate business. And, it has the potential of adding twenty (20) more homes to the large inventory of unsold and non-rehabilitated properties already owned by the City. My proposal was quite simple and produced far more "bang for the buck" than what was approved for submission to HUD late last year (I incorrectly said December)** at a City Council meeting. Immediately following was my strategy: Neighborhood Stabilization Program - Round One* -- Proposed Activities & Budget* $ 450,000 Down Payment & Closing Cost Assistance (DPA) Provide Seventy-Five (75) Forgivable Loans @ $6,000 Each For Income-Eligible & "Bankable" Home Buyers $1,195,000 Housing Rehabilitation Assistance Provide Seven-Five (75) Repayable Loans @ $15,000 Average Each For Income-Eligible & "Bankable" Home Buyers $ 375,000 Property Demolition Program -- Remove Fifty (50) Blighted & Dilapidated Properties @ $7,500 Average Each $ 124,144 Program Administration, Legal, Appraisal, Other Expenses Including Home Buyer Education & Counseling (LifeSpan) ________ $2,144,000 Total The above plan DOES NOT call for the City of Middletown to acquire, rehab and resell Twenty (20) homes. Instead, it calls for the City to make available down payment/closing cost and rehab financing in working with home buyers, participating lenders and real estate professionals. Instead of Twenty (20) households assisted this proposal assists SEVENTY-FIVE (75) home buyers! It is predicated upon using a variety of lending products including FHA 203 K and similar bank purchase/rehab mortgages. It continues the success of the Down Payment/Closing Cost Assistance Program that the Middletown Board of REALTORS, local mortgage lenders, neighborhood residents and former City staff developed dating back to the Fall months of 2007. Not only does this concept provide 350% of the benefit of the current plan, it is based upon all housing rehabilitation funds being repaid to the City via no- and very low-interest secondary financing. By the way, I submitted this to HUD Neighborhood Stabilization Program representatives (in Washington, D.C.) and they voiced no objection to this proposal. A number of members of the now defunct HUD Consolidated Planning Committee and other local informed housing industry professionals have endorsed this approach. I trust that you may give serious consideration to this proposal that is cost-effective, productive and non-bureaucratic. Sincerely, Nelson Self MiddletownUSA Post: 22 May 2009 at 7:54 pm To: Ed Richter, Middletown Journal I remember Doug Adkins, Interim Community Revitalization Director promising the City Council a revision to the City of Middletown's late 2008 application for $2.144 million NSP funds. It was promised within 90 days (sometime in April or early May)??? What happened??? You remember the City Council meeting in January where City Councilmen Becker, Schiavone and Marconi raised major concerns about the City's ability to implement any type of purchase-rehab-resale homeownership program. They cited the FHA Dollar Home fiasco, huge losses in other rehab activities, etc. etc. as the reasons. When they suggested making the NSP activity heavily based on property demolition there was no opposition (in fact there was support) from the City Manager. The video tape of the meeting confirms what we all know. Nelson Self