Print Page | Close Window

SECTION 8

Printed From: MiddletownUSA.com
Category: Middletown City Government
Forum Name: Community Revitalization
Forum Description: Middletown Community Revitalization News
URL: http://www.middletownusa.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5768
Printed Date: Nov 22 2024 at 5:38am


Topic: SECTION 8
Posted By: Vivian Moon
Subject: SECTION 8
Date Posted: Jun 10 2014 at 9:53am

Middletown pushed to oust poor renters

Sheila McLaughlin, smclaughlin@enquirer.com  5:43 a.m. EDT June 10, 2014


The city of
Middletown has been trying for several years to push out its poor.

Hundreds of pages of documents and court records obtained by The Enquirer in an investigation provided a glimpse of Middletown's plan to get rid of Section 8 tenants – a move that one national public policy expert called "perverse."

Those documents detail how the city has threatened tenants with losing their housing assistance if they have delinquent water bills from years past. They talk about putting "problematic" Section 8 landlords through special audits and background checks to weed them out of the program and reduce the amount of low-income housing available in Middletown.

"If we remove those owners from the program, we will reduce the number of available Section 8 rental properties within the City," Community Revitalization Director Doug Adkins wrote in a 2012 Section 8 housing analysis for city council.

In 2010, Adkins discussed those same topics in an earlier analysis. He put it this way: "The beauty of the changes proposed … is that we do not require HUD approval."

Adkins was recently tapped to become city manager.

Now, Middletown Public Housing Agency is under a civil rights review by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. And two Section 8 landlords have accused Middletown officials of using questionable tactics to get rid of the city's poor.

HUD officials are negotiating with Middletown to shut down its public housing agency.

City officials deny wrongdoing.

"This isn't some effort to drive people with less money out of the city of Middletown," Law Director Les Landen said. "There isn't any targeting here."

Section 8 vouchers cluster in Middletown

Turmoil in Middletown comes as the suburbs of Cincinnati brace for more Section 8 housing.  http://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/politics/2014/05/26/public-housing-slated-demolition/9602943/" rel="nofollow - Colerain Township are seeing low-income housing being built as CMHA tries to spread Section 8 housing out across Hamilton County.

ALSO:  http://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2014/06/06/avondale-housing-historic/10076409/" rel="nofollow - According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities in Washington, D.C., more than 5 million people in more than 2 million low-income households nationally use housing vouchers to rent apartments and homes on the private market.

Middletown is one of two cities in Ohio that operate their own public housing agencies. Typically, an agency handles HUD housing for an entire county, HUD officials said. Butler County has a housing authority and administers the Section 8 program outside of Middletown. Parma, near Cleveland, is the other city in Ohio that operates its own housing authority. Unlike Middletown, Parma's operation is court-ordered.

Middletown has sought more vouchers from HUD over the years as the once-thriving industrial town lost its paper mills and unemployment spiked. The agency now manages 1,662 vouchers.

City officials now are saying Section 8 clusters have created pockets of poverty in a city that is trying to revitalize. With about 50,000 residents, Middletown has 13 percent of Butler County's population but has 56 percent of its Section 8 housing vouchers. City officials argue that's out of balance.

The clusters didn't provide tax money to the city but instead drained its police and fire services budgets because of increased calls for service, city documents say.

Middletown officials want to get rid of at least 1,000 vouchers.

"The HUD policy has always been to avoid concentrations of poverty, and right now Middletown has a voucher program that has more vouchers than the rest of Butler County combined," Landen said. "If you are talking about trying to limit concentrations of poverty so they don't get into pockets, having two-thirds of the vouchers in the county in one place seems to be a bit out of whack."

Middletown resident Brandi Wilson, a 31-year-old mother, feels like city officials don't want them around.

Wilson grew up in Middletown. She said she's been on Section 8 since 2007 after she couldn't afford housing for her and her young son after a divorce.

"We'd be homeless," Wilson said of the prospect of Middletown reducing the amount of Section 8 housing.

Section 8 landlords: Criminals or victims?

Section 8 landlords Dan Tracy of Middletown and Jeff Faulkner of Camden said the city's campaign to reduce Section 8 housing has unfairly put them under criminal investigation.

City officials acknowledged they couldn't just kick tenants out of the Section 8 program because of HUD rules, city documents reveal. However, the city's 2012 Section 8 Analysis authored by Adkins published a list of "problematic" landlords whose properties chalked up the highest calls for service.

Tracy's and Faulkner's names were on that list. Tracy had 51 Section 8 units out of 150 units he rented out in the city. Faulkner had over 100 Section 8 units.

Both men came under police investigation and were charged with serious felonies for allegedly stealing money from Middletown's Section 8 voucher program. Both men and their attorneys claim they were unjustly targeted by the city in its plan to reduce Section 8 tenants.

"We think this is a backhanded way of eliminating at least a certain percentage of the vouchers from the city of Middletown," said Dwight Packard II, who is helping Tracy obtain documents from Middletown to be used in a possible lawsuit against the city.

"I'm sure they have their reasons, but there's still the law. You still have to improve your community in a way that doesn't trample other people's rights," Packard said.

Allan Mallach, a scholar in the fields of housing for the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C., said pushing out voucher holders by going after landlords is a "doubly perverse" way of getting rid of a community's poor.

"There are a lot of poor people. They are not going to disappear," Mallach said. "On one hand (they are) driving out something that the people of the community desperately need. On the other, they are basically singling out landlords to persecute them."

Packard filed legal action against the city last month to force them to produce documents involving the city's investigation of Tracy and other landlords. Packard said city officials had denied the records under the Ohio Public Records Act, contending the request was too broad.

Tracy, 66, a Section 8 landlord for decades, was charged in October 2012 with six counts of felony theft for allegedly taking $4,352 in rent payments from the city public housing agency for Section 8 tenants who did not live at the properties. Tracy said the city audited him in 2011, going back several years, as part of its plan to oust poor people.

In a plea agreement, Tracy pleaded no contest to one misdemeanor charge of petty theft – a crime that prompted Middletown to kick him out of the voucher program. Tracy claims innocence of any wrongdoing. He said his then-criminal defense attorney advised him to plead to the misdemeanor charge instead of spending more money and taking chances on an expensive trial. Packard was not that attorney.

If convicted of all charges, Tracy had faced up to 10 years in prison.

"I didn't have the evidence that I have now," Tracy said.

That evidence includes affidavits from the two tenants involved in the Section 8 rentals and from a former housing agency employee.

With Packard's help, Tracy presented his case along with those affidavits to HUD, which had also suspended him from participating in the Section 8 program because of the conviction.

Based on Tracy's appeal, HUD overturned its suspension of Tracy in January 2014. Middletown still will not allow him to participate in the city's program.

HUD spokesman Brian Gillen said the information Tracy provided clarified the facts and was sufficient to terminate HUD's suspension.

"I'm the type of person that cannot be labeled as a thief or a liar because that I am not. It really weighed on me. It was really hard for me to accept that. So, I set out to prove myself," Tracy said.

Similar charges against Faulkner were dismissed at a preliminary hearing in Middletown Municipal Court, according to a court transcript obtained by The Enquirer. A judge said whatever happened wasn't criminal.

The hearing was set to determine if there was enough evidence to send the case to a Butler County grand jury for indictment. The theft charges could have put Faulkner in prison for up to 2½ years.

Faulkner, a longtime real estate agent, faced two felony theft charges for allegedly collecting $7,386 in Section 8 rent to which he wasn't entitled.

In one incident, the housing agency had recouped the alleged misappropriated money from Faulkner's Section 8 monthly rent check. The agency returned some of it to Faulkner after he complained. Police then charged him with stealing the same money.

"They give me the money and turn around and get me for fraud," Faulkner said.

Middletown Municipal Judge Mark Wall threw out the charges this year on Jan. 14, saying there wasn't probable cause to make him believe that Faulkner had committed any crimes.

"I've got an obligation to look at the evidence," Wall said, according to a transcript of the court hearing. "You're accusing him of basically stealing this money. It may be a breach of contract. There are other remedies here."

"It seems pretty clear they are trying to get rid of the housing by prosecuting these landlords on matters that are civil in nature, not criminal," said Faulkner's attorney, Charlie Rittgers.

Landen said city officials were only trying to enforce agency rules.

"If a landlord violates the rules, we are going to pursue the necessary remedies against that landlord. It's that simple. It's a program that is run under sets of rules. Those rules are to be enforced," Landen said. "We don't want landlords involved who have attempted to manipulate the system or attempted in some way to defraud the system."

HUD scrutinizing Middletown housing

The Middletown Public Housing Agency has been under HUD's microscope for at least a year, according to documents obtained by The Enquirer.

The federal agency notified the Middletown Public Housing Agency in May 2013 that it was being investigated for possible civil rights violations. That investigation is ongoing while HUD attempts to strike a deal with Middletown to turn over its vouchers to Butler and Warren metropolitan housing authorities.

HUD spokesman Brian Gillen said the investigation was sparked by Middletown's plan to reduce the number of housing vouchers. "The circumstances surrounding the specifics of (Middletown's) plan raised fair-housing concerns," he said.

Butler and Warren counties' housing agencies have expressed interest in absorbing Middletown's vouchers.

Phyllis Hitte, executive director of Butler Metropolitan Housing Authority, said HUD asked the two agencies if they would be interested in taking on Middletown's vouchers.

If that occurs, it remains to be seen whether Middletown would reach its goal of reducing hotspots of Section 8.

"This is a choice program. We can't make them go any place. If Middletown is where they choose to live, they can still live there," Landen said.




Replies:
Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Jun 10 2014 at 7:04pm
Wow this reporter has been one of only a few to get HUD to respond to questions about what's going on. Does Doug want to second quess The Brookings Institution in D.C. I don't think he has the credentials for that. Our city council can't even get him to sign his contract. If he can push them around now , what will he do down the road? This guy is about to get out of control before he even gets started. IMO


Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Jun 10 2014 at 7:20pm
Don't understand the city at all on this Vivian. In an earlier post, you brought to the table information that the council with Smith, Nenni, Scott-Jones and others who actually wanted 800+ additional vouchers on top of what the city had at the time which was 700+, a more balanced number.

Now, they change direction 180 degrees and want all the excess vouchers out of the city. All of a sudden, while, once upon a time, striving to make this a low income community, an about face has happened and they want all low income out. Apparently too late as HUD will probably make them keep the excess. The damage has been done I believe. Typical for this group.

It is the city's fault that we have an overabundance of Section 8 in the first place. Look in the mirror city officials to see who is to blame here.

Did they really think that the Section 8 program would bring a comparable amount of fed revenue to the city rather than generating revenue using more traditonal new company taxation and employee income taxes?

Must have been easier to reach out for the fed money as they are not smart enough to manufacture new jobs like normal cities do.

-------------
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.


Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Jun 10 2014 at 7:37pm
It was easy money. Just apply for it and you probably will get it. So then they figured out how to move it to other places to use it for things than aren't quit for the most needed areas. What will they do now that it all goes away.


Posted By: Vivian Moon
Date Posted: Jun 10 2014 at 7:56pm
Vet

This article is excellent because it is filled with pure facts and not a bunch of fluff that we get from City Hall.
When all this HUD money leaves City Hall they are going to be in a world of hurt and then everyone will be able to see who has really been on the Welfare Rolls. 

I have been reading the old city council meeting minutes and over the past 15 years we have spent every extra dollar on THEIR DOWNTOWN. Million of dollars and what do we really have to show for all this time and money?



Posted By: Vivian Moon
Date Posted: Jun 11 2014 at 10:17am
Those serving on Middletown City Council in 2000 when the Section 8 vouchers were increased were:

1. Laura Williams
2. Robert Sonny Hill
3 Dave Schiavone
4. Earl Smith
5. Jerry Banks
6. Fred Sennet
7. Robert Wells


Posted By: Vivian Moon
Date Posted: Jun 23 2014 at 2:25pm
INCREASE IN SECTION 8 VOUCHERS 1999 - 2005

December 1, 1999…………75 Vouchers

May 1, 2000…………...…….50 Vouchers
September 1, 2000….……..55 Vouchers
November 1, 2000…..……200 Vouchers

October 1, 2001…..………200 Vouchers

January 1, 2003…………..200 Vouchers

October 1, 2005…………..108 Vouchers



Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Jun 23 2014 at 4:38pm
And all this was in a 5 yr. period. Interesting!


Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Jun 30 2014 at 6:14pm
Well, I guess we will be hearing an official announcement at the council meeting about Sec 8 going buy buy. Stay tuned!


Posted By: Vivian Moon
Date Posted: Jun 30 2014 at 6:37pm

Posted: 5:21 p.m. Monday, June 30, 2014

Middletown expected to transfer Section 8 vouchers to Butler Metro

By  http://www.journal-news.com/staff/michael-d-pitman/" rel="nofollow - Staff Writer

MIDDLETOWN 

    Middletown Public Housing Agency will cease to exist after Sept. 30 provided the board accepts a Voluntary Compliance Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding at its meeting Tuesday night, according to a news release from the city.

    If accepted by MPHA, this will end a dispute with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development where the city’s housing authority wanted to give back 1,008 of its 1,662 Section 8 vouchers, also known as housing choice vouchers.

    The Voluntary Compliance Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding, which was not available to the Journal-News late Monday, calls for the city’s housing board to give all of its 1,662 Section 8 vouchers assigned by HUD to the Butler Metro and Warren Metro housing authorities, according to city Law Director Les Landen.

    Butler Metro Housing Authority Executive Director Phyllis Hitte declined to comment because HUD has not yet issued a statement. Butler Metro does handle more than 1,100     Section 8 vouchers and Warren Metro handles nearly 450 Section 8 vouchers. The potential agreement will give housing authorities in each Butler and Warren counties control of all of the Section 8 vouchers assigned to the respective counties.

    “At this point, we were the only housing authority in the state of Ohio that was running on a municipal basis other than one other city, and that city had been ordered to do so by the courts,” said City Manager Doug Adkins. “We just thought that the counties would be the more appropriate entities to administer this very valuable public resource.”

    The MPHA approved a plan in October 2012 that would reduce its vouchers to 654, which is what city officials said Middletown could support in subsidized housing. Subsidized housing in the city includes the Section 8 voucher program with Middletown and Butler Metro and Low-Income Tax Credit Housing. The cut was designed to allow Middletown to only have 10 percent of its housing stock as subsidized housing.

    Until Dec. 1, 1999, the city had 774 Section 8 vouchers. But from 1999 to 2005, the city accepted 888 vouchers in order to reduce the vacancy rates of older and less-desirable homes, and to ensure that housing remained in compliance with city code, according to the plan that prompted HUD officials to ask Middletown to reconsider its position.

Middletown landlord Dan Tracy said he’s not surprised by the presumptive action that is anticipated to happen Tuesday evening. He feels Middletown’s Section 8 program needed to be “cleaned up with stricter rules.”

    “The city didn’t accomplish what they wanted to accomplish by doing things the wrong way,” Tracy said. “I think that (the Section 8 program) will be run as it is across the United States.”

    According to the latest report, the city has just more than 1,300 Section 8 vouchers.



Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Jun 30 2014 at 9:43pm
It will probably be back to the previous number of 1662 in a very short time.


Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Jun 30 2014 at 9:46pm
It appears Mr. Tracy was right all along in saying it was going.


Posted By: Mike_Presta
Date Posted: Jul 01 2014 at 3:24am
Oh, my!!!  I thought our new City Manager said that it would never happen!?!?!?!

-------------
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012


Posted By: Mike_Presta
Date Posted: Jul 01 2014 at 3:46am
So...now what happens to our city budget without all of the big bucks from HUD that go along with the administration of this program???

Oh, my!!!


-------------
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012


Posted By: Richard Saunders
Date Posted: Jul 01 2014 at 6:33am
Have those geniuses on Council signed his employment contract yet?


Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Jul 01 2014 at 7:55am
Unfortunately, yes.


Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Jul 01 2014 at 8:30am
Loved the article in the Jounal about Sec8. Spin it Dougie,Spin it!! Does he really think anyone believes what he just said? The real truth has been posted on this forum for a long time. I guess all he and Judy really accomplished was to avoid their indictments. IMO


Posted By: Stanky
Date Posted: Jul 01 2014 at 9:15am
Aggressive Section 8 reduction bravado, in-your-face challenges to HUD, claims that the city will prevail.....then defeat. Result -- no voucher reduction and a promotion to City Mgr! Up is down, black is white here in Backwardsville.


Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Jul 01 2014 at 9:44am
And we still have the hefty attorney bill to pay. I suppose the city insurance will pay that,but will they cancel the city insurance especially with another suit possibly coming?


Posted By: Talking Heads
Date Posted: Jul 01 2014 at 9:52am
Spin City.  Mr. D's comments do not surprise. He's been using the spin cycle so long now that he is a pro at cleaning the dirty laundry he and admin create. Council blindly follows their lead.   D secured himself a nice position, knowing the MPHA transfer would happen - Middletown did not follow the Fed rules, pushed it to the max and this is the gentle way out - get out of jail free card. Great achievement.  Judy retired just at the right time to allow D to continue covering up all of their mess. Landen hog ties it all together. Mr. D has Council eating out of his hands, which was his plan all along. Now, who moves up the ladder from the inside to fulfill his previous duties and new deceptions? Who does he trust to follow him blindly?


Posted By: Vivian Moon
Date Posted: Jul 01 2014 at 10:12am

I believe that Miss Judy said that we would be short 1.5 million dollars in revenues in the 2015 budget. Our reserves are now at 15% so we can’t balance the budget using this money any more.

Weather Wax has been sold and that debt is now gone

Now all the HUD funds are leaving the city and those city jobs will be leaving or will  transfer over to the General Fund.

I believe the only major expense that City Hall can now cut from the budget is to transfer the Health Department over to Butler County

I do not believe that Mr Doug will be able to cut the Fire and Police Departments and further at this time.



Posted By: spiderjohn
Date Posted: Jul 01 2014 at 10:14am
Didn't we purchase some incredibly expensive software to have our "operators" run this program?
If so--what happens with that?

All being said, the guy didn't get us in to this situation, and in his way, tried to get us out and fix it to where we would be better.

As Winwood used to sing:
Who knows what tomorrow will bring?"

<object width="420" height="315"><param name="movie" value="//www.youtube.com/v/9JgbPG1tOQg?hl=en_GB&version=3&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="//www.youtube.com/v/9JgbPG1tOQg?hl=en_GB&version=3&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="420" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>


Posted By: Vivian Moon
Date Posted: Jul 01 2014 at 10:25am
Spider
I believe Mr Doug paid about $250,000 for the new Section 8 software that connected the Section 8 tenants with the police department and the water department. 


Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Jul 01 2014 at 10:30am
It will probably bring more of the same. He knew all along how this would end but council bought every bit of his spin. I heard he's having a little bit of trouble "hitting the ground running" as he said he could do. We'll see.


Posted By: Perplexed
Date Posted: Jul 01 2014 at 2:25pm
My bet is that Mr. Fooks will be promoted to the Dougmeister's previous position. Just think, once again he will be earning thousands similar to his days as a High-Risk, Sub-Prime Home Mortgage Originator with Countrywide and Chase. Go figure? He knows well of the problems that Nelson Self inherited in 2007-08 as well as the undertakings of the Dougmeister since early 2009.


Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Jul 01 2014 at 3:45pm
Will that be a good thing or a bad thing? Does he believe Dougie's spins? Is he grateful for his appointment by him,so much so he will still do his bidding to keep his job?


Posted By: 409
Date Posted: Jul 01 2014 at 9:19pm

MIDDLETOWN

Middletown agrees to cease operation of Section 8 program

By Michael D. Pitman

Staff Writer
Middletown —
The Middletown Public Housing Agency board voted Tuesday night to end an 18-month dispute with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and transfer its 1,662 Section 8 housing vouchers to Butler and Warren counties and cease operations within three months.

The next step will be for City Council to approve the Voluntary Compliance Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding at its July 15 meeting.

“In many ways this discussion became an issue of efficiency,” said City Manager Doug Adkins. “The county housing authorities are better suited to manage the resource on behalf of our residents in Butler and Warren counties, allowing the city to focus on more city services.”

The Voluntary Compliance Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding calls for the unused 300-plus Section 8 vouchers to be allocated to another county’s public housing authority to address waiting list needs. Warren Metropolitan Housing Authority will receive 350 vouchers and Butler Metro will receive the remaining balance.

Butler Metro Housing Authority Executive Director Phyllis Hitte and Warren Metropolitan Housing Authority Executive Director Jacqueline Adkins both declined to comment because HUD has not yet issued a statement. Butler Metro does handle more than 1,100 Section 8 vouchers and Warren Metropolitan handles nearly 450 Section 8 vouchers. The potential agreement will give housing authorities in each Butler and Warren counties control of all of the Section 8 vouchers assigned to the respective counties.

A representative of HUD could not be reached for comment.

Law Director Les Landen said that no one currently on the program will lose their voucher, but they will have to go to Hamilton in Butler County and Lebanon in Warren County for services, and the process of transferring the program to the respective counties is expected to take until Sept. 30.

The MPHA’s October 2012 plan — which was to reduce its voucher allocation by 1,008 over the course of four to five years — was the city’s response to a HUD letter saying they were out of compliance with assigning Section 8 vouchers to families. The city was required to have at least 95 percent of its housing choice vouchers awarded to an applicant family. As of August 2012, the city was around 82 percent compliant.

Currently the city is closer to 80 percent complaint as they had not reassigned unused vouchers in its attempt to achieve the reduction down to 654.

City officials said Middletown has more Section 8 housing per capita than any other city in Ohio, and that a reduction in the amount of subsidized housing was necessary. In 2013, Section 8 vouchers account for 49.8 percent of all subsidized housing and 14.3 percent of all available housing in Middletown, officials said.

Many of the city’s landlords accused officials of using bully tactics and unusually stringent regulations to force them out of the program. The city paid out about $10 million a year in funds it received from HUD to hundreds of landlords who rented properties to voucher-holders. Several landlords have applauded the upcoming changes and that the county will now be running the program.

Once City Council, which are the members of the MPHA board, approves the agreement the transfer of the program to the housing authorities in Butler and Warren counties can begin. And once the two housing authorities assume administrative control of the vouchers, “MPHA shall cease (housing choice voucher) program operations and commence its formal dissolution as a (public housing agency) and governmental entity.”

The agreement also “releases and resolves” all charges HUD may levy against the city, its officials, agents and contractors “concerning the utilization of MPHA’s budget authority and failure to timely reissue vouchers” and releases HUD from any claim by the city for “reimbursement, compensation and other payment related to MPHA’s administration of the (housing choice voucher) program.”


-------------
Every morning is the dawn of a new error...


Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Jul 01 2014 at 9:33pm
You send the program to WMHA and BMHA and we won't charge you with civil rights violations. Pretty sweet deal for Judy and Dougie.


Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Jul 02 2014 at 6:20am
Adkins:

“In many ways this discussion became an issue of efficiency,” said City Manager Doug Adkins. “The county housing authorities are better suited to manage the resource on behalf of our residents in Butler and Warren counties, allowing the city to focus on more city services.”

MERCY SAKES ADKINS. THE ISSUE WASN'T ABOUT EFFICIENCY AS MUCH AS IT WAS ABOUT HUD TAKING YOU AND THE CITY TO THE WOODSHED IF YOU CONTINUED ON YOUR CURRENT PATH OF DEFIANCE.

IF THE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY IS "BETTER SUITED TO MANAGE THE RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF OUR RESIDENTS", WHY WAS MIDDLETOWN INVOLVED IN IT IN THE FIRST PLACE? ANOTHER "CONVENIENCE STATEMENT' BASED ON THE SITUATION FROM THIS PERSON.

AND FINALLY.....

"ALLOWING THE CITY TO FOCUS ON MORE CITY SERVICES"

GOOD ONE DOUGGIE

THIS CLOWN IS NO BETTER THAN ANY OF THE PREVIOUS ACTORS AS TO SPREADING THE BULLCRAP.

The agreement also “releases and resolves” all charges HUD may levy against the city, its officials, agents and contractors “concerning the utilization of MPHA’s budget authority and failure to timely reissue vouchers” and releases HUD from any claim by the city for “reimbursement, compensation and other payment related to MPHA’s administration of the (housing choice voucher) program.”


NOW, THAT'S THE REAL REASON FOR THE SECTION 8 PROGRAM ABANDONMENT DOUG. JUST TELL IT LIKE IT IS AND YOU MIGHT GET A LITTLE MORE RESPECT.

-------------
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.


Posted By: Vivian Moon
Date Posted: Jul 02 2014 at 7:49am
What will City Hall now do without the Section 8 Program as the whipping post for all their problems?
What will City Hall do now that all that HUD money will go to Butler and Warren County?
Maybe now the HUD Funds will used in the areas of greatest need to improve the city.


Posted By: Vivian Moon
Date Posted: Jul 02 2014 at 10:23am
I can not believe that TV Middletown did not film the MPHA meeting last night.
Since the Section 8 Program has dominated the focus of City Hall for the past two years and this final meeting of MPHA is not made public...another shameful action by City Hall.
I thought that was why we funded TV Middletown with our tax dollars.

City Hall can not continue to hide their wrong doings and illegal action forever....all of it will be made public.





Posted By: spiderjohn
Date Posted: Jul 02 2014 at 10:50am
Soo--what do we actually lose OR gain?
I assume that we lose the funding to administrate the Section 8 program.
Do we also lose future HUD and/or CDBG funding?
Will we see an attrition of vouchers in our city?
Will less or more vouchers be brought here by the county agencies?
Could they send more here to keep them from communities that do not want them?
Can we use the $250,000 software that we purchased to allow the former hired administrating firm to monitor the program/voucher holders?
Do we even know how to use the software?

This will tell the tale in large part as to the plan of action by Mr.A.
He seems to have an aggressive community agenda---
Let's see what he can do to turn this city around, since the tail seems to wag the dog @ Donham Abbey.

Where does Council fit in anymore, since they seem to be little more than a reactionary rubber stamp imo. Hopefully three strong progressive individuals will emerge to run in the up-coming election. SOS won't cut it imo.

I agree on TVM--they need to be showing these important meetings.
Still--they are at the mercy of Council for funding until the public steps up big time. So what do or can they really do to change their programming

Why would Council deny the opportunity to show these type of important meetings? Informed citizens become the best and most active supporting citizens.


Posted By: acclaro
Date Posted: Jul 02 2014 at 10:59am
As I stated many months ago, Mr. Adkins would get the city manager job because he would loose his job with the transfer.

I'll let others figure out why he lost his job, got the new job, got a 15% increase, and another 10% increase year 2 before starting a job.

Nothing changes in up/down, east/west Middletown dynamics. 

-------------
'An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.' - Winston Churchill


Posted By: SEEKING THE TRUTH
Date Posted: Jul 02 2014 at 5:47pm
Mess with the BULL and GET the horns. 
       Maybe some people in this town should not be @#$% with by by Judy.
                                        Nice move Doug I won the bet.
   
             section 8 whatTTTTTTTTTT


Posted By: Vivian Moon
Date Posted: Jul 03 2014 at 3:39am

Sheila McLaughlin, smclaughlin@enquirer.com10:05 p.m. EDT July 1, 2014

Middletown Public Housing Authority voted Tuesday night to dissolve the agency amid accusations that it tried to kick tenants out of the program and hassled its largest landlords to reduce the number of Section 8 housing units available.

In essence it was a unanimous decision voiced by council members. All are members of the housing authority.

The next step will happen July 15, when council approves the same Memorandum of Understanding and compliance agreement with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

In doing so, the city agrees to turn over its 1,662 Section 8 housing vouchers to metropolitan housing authorities in Butler and Warren counties. Middletown was the only city in Ohio that voluntarily ran a housing authority. Most programs are administered through counties.

“No one who has a voucher will lose it as a result of this agreement,” City Manager Doug Adkins said. “Subsidized housing will still be available in the community for low-income residents.”

The Middletown Public Housing Agency should be shut down by September.

The agreement also bans Middletown officials from singling out or discriminating against tenants, owners, landlords or property managers who participate in the Section 8 program within the city limit in “the application of building codes, health codes, zoning requirements or matters or similar matters of local law enforcement.”

A recent Enquirer investigation found hundreds of documents that detailed the city’s plan to get rid of at least two-thirds of Middletown Public Housing Agency’s 1,662 Section 8 vouchers.

They said Section 8 clusters have created pockets of poverty in a city that is trying to revitalize. With about 50,000 residents, Middletown has 13 percent of Butler County’s population but has 56 percent of its Section 8 housing vouchers.

City officials argue that’s out of balance, even though previous councils had sought to more than triple the number of vouchers to help pay for the program’s administrative costs. They denied trying to push out low-income residents.

However, some landlords were placed under criminal investigation and charged with felony theft after subsequent audits of their Section 8 records. Dan Tracy was one of them. He was kicked out of the city program as a result, even though HUD allowed him back in. He’s suing Middletown over lost business.

“The city has been hard-nosed about it. A lawsuit could have been avoided by doing the right thing,” Tracy said. ■



Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Jul 03 2014 at 6:08am
Incompetence in every facet of this endeavor by city leaders and council, past and present. What else is new. Must be the required criteria for occupying a position with this city nowadays.


"They said Section 8 clusters have created pockets of poverty in a city that is trying to revitalize. With about 50,000 residents, Middletown has 13 percent of Butler County’s population but has 56 percent of its Section 8 housing vouchers.
City officials argue that’s out of balance, even though previous councils had sought to more than triple the number of vouchers to help pay for the program’s administrative costs. They denied trying to push out low-income residents"

This says it all. How in the hell can you revitalize a city when you invite more poverty in? Creates an increase in crime, a strain on your resources and a ghetto-like image to outsiders that may never be repaired. City leaders created the problem with oversaturation, then blame the decision they made for creating an "out of balance" situation in their words. They are their own worst enemy. Are there no boundaries to their ignorance?




-------------
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.


Posted By: Stanky
Date Posted: Jul 03 2014 at 7:00am
We need to hear from M29 about his complicity in increasing the vouchers during his time on council.


Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Jul 03 2014 at 7:04am
From the article it sounds like one man has the guts to take on the administration. Maybe we need more people standing up and saying this isn't right. More power to him if he was unjustly charged with a crime.


Posted By: 409
Date Posted: Jul 14 2014 at 5:44pm

Posted: 5:22 p.m. Monday, July 14, 2014



MIDDLETOWN

Council expected to vote Tuesday to move Section 8 to Butler, Warren

By Michael D. Pitman

Staff Writer
MIDDLETOWN —
Middletown City Council is expected to approve an agreement with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Tuesday and begin transferring the city’s 1,662 Section 8 housing vouchers to Butler and Warren counties.

The board of the Middletown Public Housing Agency, which is made up of all five City Council members, voted unanimously July 1 to accept a Voluntary Compliance Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding with HUD to shut down its city-run Section 8 housing program by Sept. 30. The agreement also stipulated the city would hand over all of its housing choice vouchers to the metropolitan housing authorities in Butler and Warren counties.

Butler County would receive 1,312 of the city’s vouchers and Warren County would receive the other 350 under the agreement. It was initially reported that any vouchers not assigned to a family (there are currently more than 300) would be sent to a public housing authority with a waiting list, but Middletown Law Director Les Landen said that is not the case.

Landen said once City Council approves the deal, he would “then anticipate it would be signed by HUD, the city and MPHA, and that agreement would be in place.

“And that would likely lead to a couple of agreements with Butler County and Warren County,” he said.

The pending agreement would end an 18-month dispute between Middletown and HUD over the city’s subsidized housing program.

HUD officials had maintained Middletown was out of compliance with the agency’s regulations by not having at least 95 percent of its available vouchers filled. The city had a compliance rate of only 82 percent, according to HUD.

City officials were adamant about their desire to reduce the amount of Section 8, or low-income housing, citing the fact that Middletown had more Section 8 housing per capita than any city in Ohio and almost double what the rest of Butler County has. Section 8 accounts for more than 14 percent of all available housing in the city and nearly 50 percent of all subsidized housing, according to 2013 data from the city.

The city pays out around $10 million a year in funds from HUD to hundreds of landlords who rent properties to voucher-holders. Middletown was one of two cities in Ohio that still managed its own public housing authority.

Butler Metro Housing Authority Executive Director Phyllis Hitte and Warren Metropolitan Housing Authority Executive Director Jacqueline Adkins are not commenting on ensuing transfer of vouchers until they receive an official notification from HUD. The spokesman for HUD’s regional office in Chicago, which covers Ohio, has not returned phone calls from the Journal-News seeking comment.


-------------
Every morning is the dawn of a new error...


Posted By: Vivian Moon
Date Posted: Jul 14 2014 at 8:47pm

I do hate to tell you but this is just the beginning of the Middletown Section 8 Voucher Scandal.

This was a total failure of City Council and those at City Hall


Posted By: middletownscouter
Date Posted: Jul 15 2014 at 10:38am
I've been trying to keep up with this whole debacle but the question I don't think I've found an answer to (and maybe I missed it), is whether this transfer means that the number of Section 8 vouchers in the city of Middletown will increase, decrease or maintain?


Posted By: Vivian Moon
Date Posted: Jul 15 2014 at 11:54am
MiddletownScouter
When these 1662 vouchers are transfered to Warren and Butler counties Middletown will have NO OVERSIGHT OR CONTROL over the Section 8 Program...However I would doubt that Butler County would increase this number above the current 1662 vouchers that are now located in Middletown area..



Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Jul 15 2014 at 12:42pm
BMHA wil bring Middletown back in to compliance with 1312 vouchers from HUD and WCPH will have 350 vouchers in the city of Middletown but located in Warren County. This is the number 1662 that was in question all along with Middletown not being in compliance. The were so sure they did not have to fill those vouchers as they became available thru people leaving the program. They were wrong. If the powers that be knew half as much about the program as they thought they did, they could have saved themselves lots of money they spent on attorney fees and the possible ensuing law suits to come. IMO


Posted By: Vivian Moon
Date Posted: Jul 15 2014 at 1:16pm
over the hill
You are soooo right
City Hall huffed and puffed for 18 months, wasted time, a big bunch of money and gained nothing.
Before this is all over it will cost City Hall even more big bucks for yet another royal scew up.


Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Jul 15 2014 at 2:24pm
Originally posted by over the hill over the hill wrote:

BMHA wil bring Middletown back in to compliance with 1312 vouchers from HUD and WCPH will have 350 vouchers in the city of Middletown but located in Warren County. This is the number 1662 that was in question all along with Middletown not being in compliance. The were so sure they did not have to fill those vouchers as they became available thru people leaving the program. They were wrong. If the powers that be knew half as much about the program as they thought they did, they could have saved themselves lots of money they spent on attorney fees and the possible ensuing law suits to come. IMO


I was hoping that, after the Section 8 administration was moved out of the city, the Butler County folks would correct the amount of vouchers that Middletown is SUPPOSE to have....that being around 700 or so. There needs to be a fair allocation of vouchers distributed in each community in Butler County depending on city population. It wouldn't hurt to see the communities that haven't received their fair share finally absorb the correct number into their community. There is no purpose in over-saturating this city while leaving other towns with less than their fair share. As a matter of fact, it helps weaken an already vulnerable city when they continue to deem Middletown the SW Ohio Mecca for Section 8. Let's spread the Section 8 out to dilute it's effect.

The past and present city leaders were ignorant to ask for more Section 8. That doesn't mean that we need to see the mistake continue with the mega-voucher numbers concentrated here.

-------------
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.


Posted By: processor
Date Posted: Jul 15 2014 at 3:51pm
Well said Vet. I hope that you're right, but have little confidence in Butler and Warren counties admin. They are Hamilton and Lebanon centric and don't care about Middletown. My guess is that overtime Middletown will gain more subsidized housing.

AS Ms. Moon pointed out, with the program control being transferred, Middletown will have little to no say in the allocation of vouchers.


Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Jul 15 2014 at 4:19pm
Middletown lost their control of the program(big mistake). I agree with you VV but according to HUD they see the need. It probably did not help when Judy and Doug decided to declare Middletown 54% poverty level. But as we know that was about the money not about what was best for our city.


Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Sep 23 2014 at 5:48pm
Well there seems to be another delay in the moving of the section 8 voucher program. Seems they have pushed it back to Nov 1 for the transfer. Wonder what that's all about?



Print Page | Close Window