Print Page | Close Window

Overtime expected to be $800,000

Printed From: MiddletownUSA.com
Category: Middletown City Government
Forum Name: City Manager
Forum Description: Discuss the city manager administration including all city departments.
URL: http://www.middletownusa.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5557
Printed Date: Nov 22 2024 at 3:02am


Topic: Overtime expected to be $800,000
Posted By: Vivian Moon
Subject: Overtime expected to be $800,000
Date Posted: Nov 25 2013 at 9:46am
Posted: 7:30 a.m. Monday, Nov. 25, 2013

Overtime expected to cost Middletown $800,000

By http://www.journal-news.com/staff/rick-mccrabb/" rel="nofollow - Rick McCrabb

Staff Writer

MIDDLETOWN —

The city of Middletown is projected to spend nearly $800,000 in overtime in public safety next year, the fire and police chiefs said.

During the budget meeting last week, David VanArsdale, Middletown police chief, said overtime will cost his department $550,000, mainly because officers who work second and third shift are required to testify in court.

Middletown Division of Fire Chief Steve Botts said his department will spend about $225,000 in overtime.

Because the city is prepared to slice the public safety budget and reduce the workforce by 22 positions next year, vice mayor Dan Picard, adamant about public safety, suggested eliminating ovetime in both departments as a way to reduce the budget. Instead of working overtime, he suggested police officers and fire fighters should take comp time. The chiefs said that plan isn’t feasible because an employee would have to be called in and paid overtime to cover for the person who is off work.

VanArsdale commended his staff for its “successes” this year, fighting the increased heroin abuse in the city, and its retail task force that netted 116 arrests, 69 for organized crime, and the recovery of $300,000 in merchandise.

Next year the total budget for the police department is expected to drop from $12,146,807 to $11,919,025, or 1.9 percent. Of the 2014 budget, $356,272 comes from the COPS grant.

The fire department budget is dropping from $9,213,175 in 2013 to $9,080,053 next year, a decrease of 1.4 percent. Next year’s budget includes $328,667 from the SAFER grant that expires on Aug. 6, 2014.

The fire department could lose up to 15 positions next year. A SAFER grant that funds six positions is set to expire in August 2014, and according to the budget, nine more positions are expected to be eliminated.

This comes at a time when the department is seeing a record number of emergency calls, Botts said. He said in the 1990s, the department averaged 5,000 calls a year and the that number has risen to 11,000. Botts called this “very challenging, historic times.”

From 2000 to 2014, the police budget has increased $2.6 million or 28 percent, while the fire budget has gone from $7 million to $9 million, or 30 percent.

Meanwhile, the city’s total budget has gone from $27.6 million in 2000 to $29 million in 2014, or an increase of 5 percent.
I find this is a very misleading statement. City Hall used the rainy day fund in order to cover the increases in the budget. The revenues of Middletown continue to fall every year. We are going broke.

Picard also wanted City Manager Judy Gilleland to apply for additional public safety grants to replace those that are expiring. Other council members didn’t support Picard’s motion. Council member Josh Laubach said grants aren’t “free money” because of the restrictions tied to them.

City to buy street sweeper

On a night when council was discussing millions of dollars in the city’s budget, there was much debate over several thousand dollars. Council approved the purchase of a Tymco 600 street sweeper from Contract Sweepers & Equipment of West Chester for $212,509, which was $12,000 more than another model.

Cindy Strayer, the city’s purchasing agent, said less expensive street sweepers were available, but the city’s maintenance crew selected the one from the West Chester company.

Picard questioned why the city didn’t purchase the cheaper model.

Strayer said the decision wasn’t based on dollars and cents, but rather what was “better for us.”

Gilleland said the decision was not “done in favoritism.”




Replies:
Posted By: Perplexed
Date Posted: Nov 25 2013 at 9:58am
Gray skies are going to clear up, put on a happy face.  Smile


Posted By: acclaro
Date Posted: Nov 25 2013 at 11:22am
Firstly, the city is not going broke, as it will always have some form of revenue stream, but I comprehend your reference.
The reality and facts are the city's EXPENDITURES are exceeding its fixed costs set by its annual budget. Overtime is a variable cost, although the city should be able to extrapolate on trends, what overtime will be. In Middletown, they forecast that in the budget as part of budgetary requests.
As for 3rd and 2nd shift police officers having to testify, perhaps plea bargains is a solution. Or a night court, based upon severity of crime, although unlikely attributed to stenographer, and court administration.
A city never has to go broke or spending more than it takes in; it makes cuts.
That is the true issue; can Middletown get its budget in order? Can Middletown make the necessary cuts. Someone should also be investigating the rather fraudulent public safety levy 'message' to win the 1.75% tax. These issues were known then about pension costs, overtime, variable costs exceeding the set annual budget. They should have stated it before passing the levy at 1.75%, they were going to have to make cuts and it was only a short-term solution. A rather direct, bait and switch.
Heard through the grapevine Ms. Gilleland doesn't like her view being obstructed of the river by Bay West. Maybe she will run them off to Harrodsburg KY and see another 200 jobs lost to go with AK, CS& H, others.
Also heard a new ordinance is coming associated with fire and police sirens blasting, so everyone in Middletown knows how indispensable and busy they are in making their 'runs'. Getting rather tired of feeling as though Middletown is sounding like NY city daily.          

-------------
'An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.' - Winston Churchill


Posted By: Perplexed
Date Posted: Nov 25 2013 at 3:14pm
I sounds like the masterminds of the public safety levy received guidance from those in Washington, D.C. who foisted Obamacare on us.  In neither instance were all facts accurately presented.


Posted By: Mike_Presta
Date Posted: Nov 25 2013 at 3:50pm
"Meanwhile, the city’s total budget has gone from $27.6 million in 2000 to $29 million in 2014, or an increase of 5 percent."
 
The above statement is grossly misleading!!!  The City's "total budget" is north of $130 million!!! 
 
It is the "General Fund" that is about $29 million.  The other $100+ million is scattered amongst a large number of other funds and this is where the "MAGIC" happens.  That is, this is where the administration (and their friends) consistently find money "tucked away in one of our other funds" whenever they need it for their pet projects!!!


-------------
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012


Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Nov 27 2013 at 12:05pm
Well, what else is new that Judy mislead us on the correct amounts of the general fund. Just like Doug Atkins is guilty of misfeasance, INTENTIONALLY giving incorrect advice,which he has done to city council.But do you think council has the b-lls to call either one of them on it? NO IMO



Print Page | Close Window