The city plans to demolish 50 homes in the city be
Printed From: MiddletownUSA.com
Category: Middletown City Government
Forum Name: Community Revitalization
Forum Description: Middletown Community Revitalization News
URL: http://www.middletownusa.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4769
Printed Date: Nov 22 2024 at 1:17am
Topic: The city plans to demolish 50 homes in the city be
Posted By: USPRO6
Subject: The city plans to demolish 50 homes in the city be
Date Posted: Sep 17 2012 at 12:11pm
50 homes to be razed by year’s endBy http://www.middletownjournal.com/staff/michael-d-pitman/ - Staff Writer MIDDLETOWN — The city plans to demolish 50 homes in the city before the end of the year. The homes, which are blighted and abandoned, will be razed with money from the Ohio Attorney General’s Moving Ohio Forward Demolition Grant that was received by the Butler County Land Reutilization Corp., also called the county land bank, on behalf of the city. The grant is part of a multi-million federal settlement with multiple mortgage providers for foreclosure abuse. The Ohio Attorney General’s office was given the state’s portion and set $75 million aside for the grant program designed to demolish blighted and abandoned homes. The city plans to tear down 300 blighted and abandoned homes by the end of 2013. About 50 of those homes will be razed by the end of this year, said Middletown Community Revitalization Director Doug Adkins. The city currently demolishes about 40 to 50 homes a year, but there are more than 3,000 blighted and abandoned homes in the city, he said. “Community Revitalization staff are starting a review of the first properties to be demolished under the program,” Adkins said. The first few homes to be demolished have not yet been determined, he said. “We will start with the most visible blighted properties on our main thoroughfares and those that present safety issues,” Adkins said. “The first priority is simply to remove the worst properties and plant grass on the lots. Eventually, some areas — particularly those with a number of adjacent parcels — may be opened to development.” Tearing down blight “is probably not a bad idea,” said Middletown Board of Realtors president Reva Owens. “But a lot of it depends on where they get the houses from and who owns the houses,” she said. If homes are truly blight and present safety issues, then Owens said she supports the efforts. However, Owens said she’d like the city to address issues beyond the blighted and abandoned homes. “I would like to see them get rid of the commercial buildings that have been sitting for a long time, but I know that’s not what this money is for,” she said. City Council agreed in July to join the land bank, which can acquire vacant, abandoned, tax foreclosed or other property for rehabilitation or reuse. The land bank applied for a $2.7 million grant from the Ohio Attorney General’s Office. The grant is to be split between Middletown and Hamilton, the only municipal members of the land bank, but a $1.1 million match by each city must be made. Middletown agreed to match the funds in July. Two city staff members will be trained to detect asbestos in any homes to be demolished. The training will be paid for through Community Development Block Grant training funds. Inspections typically cost the city $500 per home. The $150,000 estimated to be saved by the end of 2013 will be reinvested into additional demolitions, he said.
|
Replies:
Posted By: Libertarian
Date Posted: May 11 2013 at 8:32am
Vivian, Terry, Steve, Pacman, Etc., does anyone know the status of this nearly $2M demolition program? How many structures have been razed thus far? How much money has been spent? What is the unspent balance of funding? How much is allocated for administration and/or program delivery? What was the original timetable for completion of this "urban renewal" venture?
|
Posted By: Vivian Moon
Date Posted: May 11 2013 at 9:49am
Libertarian The Moving Ohio Forward Program is an 18 month program that began May 2012 and will end December 2013. This 2.1 million dollar program had some problems the first 6 months of operation however since January 2013 the homes have been tumbling down almost every day. I believe Mr. Adkins may meet his goal to demo 300 homes during the required 18 month period but the 2nd Ward looks like it has been bombed. If the first round of demo goes well I have heard that the state may offer more money for 2014. I have not pulled any numbers on this program yet since it had such a slow start. At the completion of this program City Hall will have 300 homes that will no longer be paying taxes into the coffers.
|
Posted By: Libertarian
Date Posted: May 11 2013 at 10:40am
Thanks for staying on top of yet another community improvement (?) venture by Mr. Akins. As an aside, I wonder what impact (if any) that this demo blitzkrieg has had upon property values/marketability in Ward 2 and other neighborhoods?
Do you have a listing of the addresses of properties razed?
|
Posted By: Historic House Guy
Date Posted: Aug 16 2013 at 6:30am
Go to the city's web site and look under community development. You'll find the list there.
|
Posted By: 409
Date Posted: Aug 30 2013 at 8:33am
From MJ: Middletown behind schedule on vacant home demolitions By http://www.middletownjournal.com/staff/michael-d-pitman/" rel="nofollow - Staff Writer MIDDLETOWN — Middletown could lose thousands of dollars in federal grant money if it fails to demolish 300 vacant, dilapidated homes by the end of the year. And city officials said Thursday they are already behind schedule. City officials are using a $1.35 million Moving Ohio Forward grant from the Attorney General’s Office to raze the 300 homes throughout Middletown. If the city doesn’t reach its goal by Dec. 31, then it will lose a prorated amount of money. So far, the city has torn down 89 homes with about 215 more yet to be contracted out for demolition. The city has about $2.4 million to spend — the city had to match the federal grant with $1.1 million of its own — which equates to an estimated average of $8,000 per house for all 300. Community Revitalization Director Doug Adkins said the city is “a little behind” schedule to tear down these homes because “it took ramp-up time to get each piece of the puzzle operating at full capacity to meet our expectations.” That included title searches, asbestos surveys, contractor walk-throughs and bidding, and then the demolition, he said. “We have a number of contractors working, and we should meet our objective,” Adkins said. “The grant runs out on Dec. 31. Any homes not completed will not be paid, so we’ll manage that process more and more closely as the months move along.” The grant from the Ohio Attorney General’s Office came from a federal multi-billion settlement with five of the nation’s largest mortgage providers. Ohio’s share of that settlement was $335 million and the attorney general committed $75 million to the Moving Ohio Forward Grant Program to demolish vacant and abandoned properties. The money was divided among the state’s 88 counties. In recent years, the city has attempted to remove blighted homes with limited funding, mostly with government grants. Very few have been razed with Community Development Block Grant funds in recent years, but since 2009 the city has razed around 80 blighted homes with the federal Neighborhood Stabilization Program funds. But as the city is tearing down these properties, they are selling them off in order to put them back on the tax rolls. And most people who have bought the land are using it to expand their yards, which is the goal of Elizabeth Miller of 608 Crawford St. She’s in the process of buying 606 Crawford St., which City Council approved to sell for $500 in June. “She bought it because we didn’t have a yard and wanted it for recreation purposes,” said Josh Kettlehake, Miller’s boyfriend. Miller was not available for comment Thursday afternoon. Since 2010, the city has sold 17 parcels to property owners. Of these 17 properties, nine had some type of structure that needed to be torn down. The city spent more than $60,000 in grant money to clear the land, but more than a collective $8,200 of city funds to maintain these properties. It costs about $40 per mow to cut the grass at a residential lot, and the city spends about $400 per city-owned residential lot a year. The cost rises and falls depending on the size of the lots and growth of the grass, city officials said. The 17 properties were sold for a collective $8,705, though three properties — which were approved earlier this year by City Council to sell — have yet to be transferred to the property owners’ names, according to the Butler County Auditor’s records. Staff Writer Ed Richter contributed to this story.
By the numbers The city of Middletown has invested $1.1 million to receive a $1.35 million grant from the Ohio Attorney General’s office to raze hundreds of homes by the end of this year. The goal is around 300 homes. 89: The number of homes razed 215: The number of homes yet to be demolished on the city’s list $8,000: The average estimated cost to raze 300 homes with the $2.4 million the city has to demolish dilapidated homes.
------------- Every morning is the dawn of a new error...
|
Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Aug 30 2013 at 8:56am
"Middletown could lose thousands of dollars in federal grant money if it fails to demolish 300 vacant, dilapidated homes by the end of the year. And city officials said Thursday they are already behind schedule."
"89: The number of homes razed
215: The number of homes yet to be demolished on the city’s list"
LET'S SEE, 89 and 215 is 304, right? Story says 300. Did the city lose 4 homes along the way?
WILL THIS BE ANOTHER CLUSTER ON THE CITY'S RESUME? WE WAIT.....WITH BAITED ANTICIPATION.
"Community Revitalization Director Doug Adkins said the city is “a little behind” schedule to tear down these homes because “it took ramp-up time to get each piece of the puzzle operating at full capacity to meet our expectations.” That included title searches, asbestos surveys, contractor walk-throughs and bidding, and then the demolition, he said."
“We have a number of contractors working, and we should meet our objective,” Adkins said. “The grant runs out on Dec. 31. Any homes not completed will not be paid, so we’ll manage that process more and more closely as the months move along.”
GEE, DOUGIE, ARE YOU DOING THE WHOLE PROCESS ONE HOUSE AT A TIME OR ARE YOU MULTI-TASKING? MAYBE MORE THAN ONE ASBESTOS SURVEY, TITLE SEARCH, BID AND WALK-THRU AT A TIME? PRODUCTION LINE IT BUD.
------------- I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.
|
Posted By: Perplexed
Date Posted: Aug 30 2013 at 9:07am
Another of Doogies' big promises with questionable results similar to the 2,300 property code enforcement blitzkrieg, $20,000,000 NSP multi-year housing plan, etc., etc. What will be his next headline-making proclamation?? The proof is always in the pudding.
|
Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Aug 30 2013 at 9:19am
Perplexed wrote:
<font face="Courier New, Courier, mono" size="2">Another of Doogies' big promises with questionable results similar to the 2,300 property code enforcement blitzkrieg, $20,000,000 NSP multi-year housing plan, etc., etc. What will be his next headline-making proclamation?? The proof is always in the pudding. |
AND JUST WHAT HAPPENED TO THE 2300 PROPERTY ENFORCEMENT CITATIONS THAT WERE SENT TO RESIDENTS? WAS A HOT ITEM FOR AWHILE BUT HAS SINCE FALLEN OFF THE RADAR, RIGHT? DID THE CITY BACK OFF ON THE PROGRAM? PAINT PEELING AND RUSTY GUTTERS WERE A BIG NO-NO BACK THEN. WE HAVE PICTURES OF THIS SOMEWHERE ON THIS FORUM. AND WHERE DID THE MONEY GO FOR THE LOW INTEREST LOANS FROM THE CITY FOR PEOPLE TO ADDRESS THESE VIOLATIONS?
------------- I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.
|
Posted By: Perplexed
Date Posted: Aug 30 2013 at 9:32am
Maybe Doogie should explain what happened to: 1) $500,000+ in the owner-occupied housing rehab revolving loan fund; 2) diminished funding for the highly-successful emergency repair/minor housing rehab effort in conjunction with People Working Cooperatively -- only a few years ago the City's use of $150,000 leveraged over $500,000 in needed improvements; 3) is there still a owner-occupied housing rehab program and how much CDBG/HOME funds are allocated for this purpose; and, 4) whatever happened to the NSP residential acquisition/rehab/resale proceeds -- are we to understand that much of this HIGHLY WASTEFUL program was used for additional demolition? It appears that Judy G. and city council are equally at fault.
|
Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Aug 30 2013 at 12:06pm
Soooo, What else is new? We promise a lot of things, but reality hits in the A$$, and things change and we back peddle. I don't think we will EVER get a truthful answer on those numbers from Judy or Dougie.Council won't ask and won't tell.
|
Posted By: 409
Date Posted: Aug 30 2013 at 6:00pm
From MJ: City gets more time to raze buildings By http://www.middletownjournal.com/staff/michael-d-pitman/" rel="nofollow - Staff Writer MIDDLETOWN — The Ohio Attorney General’s Office said any county that does not spend its Moving Ohio Forward Grant money by the end of the year can have five more months. In Friday’s Middletown Journal, we reported that the city of Middletown was behind on the pace to raze its estimated 300 homes using the grant money — which is specifically dedicated to tear down dilapidated and abandoned homes — but officials were optimistic about reaching its goal by the end of the year. However, Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine announced Friday morning that deadline will be moved back to May 31. “I am pleased with the progress made by communities to raze abandoned and blighted homes,” DeWine said. “By extending the deadline through late spring, we hope that counties will continue to take advantage of the funds available to them to get rid of abandoned homes that have attracted crime and are community eyesores.” The city has razed 89 homes and has its sights on demolishing another 215 homes. Cities and counties that have received the funds had asked for an extension due to inclement weather, and finding qualified demolition contractors in some areas was also an issue, according to DeWine. Middletown Community Revitilization Director Doug Adkins couldn’t be reached for comment on if Middletown was among those that requested extensions. The Moving Ohio Forward Grant came from a federal multi-billion settlement with five of the nation’s largest mortgage providers. Ohio’s share of that settlement was $335 million and the attorney general committed $75 million to the Moving Ohio Forward Grant Program to demolish dilapidated and abandoned properties. The money was divided among the state’s 88 counties. Middletown, as well as the city of Hamilton, were the only two cities in the county to receive the grant money. They equally split the county’s $2.7 million share but were required to match it with $1.1 million. To date the Attorney General’s Office has reimbursed counties more than $22.3 million and documented a total of more than $36.6 million in the demolition of more than 4,700 units. The average cost per demolition is $7,700. Statewide, nearly $22.37 million has been reimbursed to communities that have razed homes, according to the Ohio Attorney General’s Office. Middletown and Hamilton collectively have been reimbursed $559,835.
------------- Every morning is the dawn of a new error...
|
Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Aug 31 2013 at 9:31am
Did Pitman write in the paper that the Orman Building was torn down with MOF funds? Are they allowed to use those funds for commercial property or are they just for residential teardowns?
|
Posted By: Historic House Guy
Date Posted: Aug 31 2013 at 10:57am
From what I understand it's to be used for residential only.
|
Posted By: Vivian Moon
Date Posted: Aug 31 2013 at 12:16pm
The demo of the Orman Building for 600,000 dollars was paid for from the restricted Well Head Protection Fund which I believe was a misuse of public funds
|
Posted By: Vivian Moon
Date Posted: Aug 31 2013 at 12:25pm
It iis my understanding that the large building at the corner of Woodlawn and Crawford where the Best Lounge was located which is commercial/residenial will be torn down using MOF Funds. ???
|
Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Aug 31 2013 at 12:52pm
But don't anyone on council ask any questions about proper use of funds. They don't even want to talk about anything because HUD has them all running scared, but Dougie keeps telling them everything is going to be "fine".And Judy keeps smiling.
|
Posted By: chmoore1
Date Posted: Sep 04 2013 at 10:09pm
Historic House Guy: can you give the exact web address---I can't find it under community development. I'd like to see the addresses. Thanks. chmoore
|
Posted By: Historic House Guy
Date Posted: Sep 05 2013 at 1:14pm
They took it down for fear of people breaking in the houses and gutting them. They've been knocking them down like crazy on Howard and Arlington streets.
|
Posted By: Perplexed
Date Posted: Sep 05 2013 at 2:17pm
HHG - Please enlighten us as to the city's reuse plans for these already cleared lots/soon-to-be cleared lots.
|
Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Sep 05 2013 at 2:33pm
They would like to sell the lots to the home owners next door to get them off city up keep. Let's see how that goes. They have sold a few.
|
Posted By: VietVet
Date Posted: Sep 05 2013 at 3:04pm
over the hill wrote:
They would like to sell the lots to the home owners next door to get them off city up keep. Let's see how that goes. They have sold a few. |
And you're right, they have had a few takers on splitting the residential lots, especially in the older neighborhoods where there is little side yard. But what about the larger lots like the old Roosevelt school site that sits on Central? What would be the plan on a lot that size? The old Ortman Building lot and Swallens/Sorg Paper locations? What is the city's plan to fill the larger commercial lots? They haven't necessarily impressed any of us with their success rate at filling all the green spaces created by the demo blitzkrieg now have they. He--, they're having a hard time filling the "prime land" out by Atrium. Look at how fast the Austin/I-75 interchange is building up and compare that to the 122/I-75 interchange. Quicker pace up north.
------------- I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.
|
Posted By: Perplexed
Date Posted: Sep 14 2013 at 3:35pm
Here's believing that no news yet from HUD is good news. Of course, it could also be the calm before the storm too! Resolution of this matter should be forthcoming by the end of the month.On a personal note, we extend our sincerest condolences to Vivian Moon on the recent passing of her youngest daughter. You're always in our thoughts and prayers. You've done so much to encourage some senior city staff to try to be forthright and honest in their wheeling and dealing..
|
Posted By: over the hill
Date Posted: Sep 14 2013 at 6:03pm
Condolences to you Vivian at a very hard time.
|
|