Now, I know that I saw Ms. Gilleland at the Council meeting last night, and I presume that Mr. Kohler, in his official capacity as Planning Director, was speaking for the City. Perhaps Ms. G. can explain THIS to me, so that I can better explain it to other Middletonians:
Mr. Kohler stated that, via the new re-zoning of the previously rezoned, overlay of the former rezoned rezoning of the rezoning resulting from the 2005 rezoning of the original zoning, it was his intent to aim development of the areas just east of Interstate 75 at walk-up and bike traffic to serve residents of the immediate area. I think that that’s a WONDERFUL idea, but you all know that I’m not too bright. With that in mind, perhaps Ms. Gilleland could explain WHY we want to aim an area immediately adjacent to an interchange on one of the most heavily traveled stretches of interstate in the whole wide gall-darned United States of America towards pedestrian and bike traffic, yet, at the very same time, we seem to be aiming things in our former downtown (where there seems to be MOSTLY pedestrian and bike traffic, and only about .000000000000001% of the vehicular traffic at DRIVE IN TOURISM miles from the great majority of our city’s hotel/motel room count!!!
Remember, Ms. G., I am in complete agreement with YOU and YOUR sub-ordinates, I just can’t figure out how to explain it to all of the others!
Please help me!
------------- “Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
|