Print Page | Close Window

Obama Popularity in Ohio Slips

Printed From: MiddletownUSA.com
Category: Outside World
Forum Name: News, Info and Happenings outside Middletown
Forum Description: It might be happening outside Middletown, but it affects us here at home.
URL: http://www.middletownusa.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1535
Printed Date: Dec 22 2024 at 8:15pm


Topic: Obama Popularity in Ohio Slips
Posted By: Pacman
Subject: Obama Popularity in Ohio Slips
Date Posted: Jul 08 2009 at 8:08am

Obama’s popularity plummets in Ohio

Updated 10:01 PM Tuesday, July 7, 2009

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama’s approval rating in Ohio is slipping fast.

Just two months ago, Ohioans gave the president a 62-31 percent approval rating, according to a Quinnipiac University poll.

In a Tuesday, July 7, Quinnipiac poll, Obama’s approval had dropped to 49-44 percent.

Ohioans also disapproved of the way Obama is handling the economy by 48 -46 percent; in May, Ohioans gave Obama high marks for the handling of the economy, with 57 approving and 36 percent disapproving.




Replies:
Posted By: Hermes
Date Posted: Jul 08 2009 at 9:03am
Someone explain to me,why does everyone think that Obama can pull the nation out and fix everything in just a few months when it took eight years to get us in this mess ? Raise your hand class if YOU have the answer !

-------------
No more democrats no more republicans,vote Constitution Party !!


Posted By: Pacman
Date Posted: Jul 08 2009 at 9:17am
Hermes you really believe that this was all done in 8 years, this mess started back in the Clinton era and got worse with Bush until we have the current mess.  I guess you think all this debt building up under Obama is a wonderful occurance also and we will just be able to snap our fingers and make it disappear.  This will come back to bite Obama in 4 years and I personally think he is going to be a one term President....at least I hope so.  The Country can't afford 8 years of this crap......we are broke as a country now and we haven't even gotten into the Health Care debacle and Cap & Tax yet.
 
Obama's problem is he is pushing to hard to fast.  He has yet to finish anything and he is on to something else.  He acts as if he doesn't cram all of this into the first 1 to 2 years he won't get it done as he won't be elected to a second term.


Posted By: Pacman
Date Posted: Jul 08 2009 at 9:19am
There is more than just this that casued the problems, but this is not just a Bush Issue it is a Failing of the Democratics and Republicans together to not see the handwriting on the wall.
 
September 30, 1999

Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending

By STEVEN A. HOLMES

In a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corporation is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders.

The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets -- including the New York metropolitan region -- will encourage those banks to extend home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring.

Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.

In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies have been pressing Fannie Mae to help them make more loans to so-called subprime borrowers. These borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can only get loans from finance companies that charge much higher interest rates -- anywhere from three to four percentage points higher than conventional loans.

''Fannie Mae has expanded home ownership for millions of families in the 1990's by reducing down payment requirements,'' said Franklin D. Raines, Fannie Mae's chairman and chief executive officer. ''Yet there remain too many borrowers whose credit is just a notch below what our underwriting has required who have been relegated to paying significantly higher mortgage rates in the so-called subprime market.''

Demographic information on these borrowers is sketchy. But at least one study indicates that 18 percent of the loans in the subprime market went to black borrowers, compared to 5 per cent of loans in the conventional loan market.

In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's.

''From the perspective of many people, including me, this is another thrift industry growing up around us,'' said Peter Wallison a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. ''If they fail, the government will have to step up and bail them out the way it stepped up and bailed out the thrift industry.''

Under Fannie Mae's pilot program, consumers who qualify can secure a mortgage with an interest rate one percentage point above that of a conventional, 30-year fixed rate mortgage of less than $240,000 -- a rate that currently averages about 7.76 per cent. If the borrower makes his or her monthly payments on time for two years, the one percentage point premium is dropped.

Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, does not lend money directly to consumers. Instead, it purchases loans that banks make on what is called the secondary market. By expanding the type of loans that it will buy, Fannie Mae is hoping to spur banks to make more loans to people with less-than-stellar credit ratings.

Fannie Mae officials stress that the new mortgages will be extended to all potential borrowers who can qualify for a mortgage. But they add that the move is intended in part to increase the number of minority and low income home owners who tend to have worse credit ratings than non-Hispanic whites.

Home ownership has, in fact, exploded among minorities during the economic boom of the 1990's. The number of mortgages extended to Hispanic applicants jumped by 87.2 per cent from 1993 to 1998, according to Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies. During that same period the number of African Americans who got mortgages to buy a home increased by 71.9 per cent and the number of Asian Americans by 46.3 per cent.

In contrast, the number of non-Hispanic whites who received loans for homes increased by 31.2 per cent.

Despite these gains, home ownership rates for minorities continue to lag behind non-Hispanic whites, in part because blacks and Hispanics in particular tend to have on average worse credit ratings.

In July, the Department of Housing and Urban Development proposed that by the year 2001, 50 percent of Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's portfolio be made up of loans to low and moderate-income borrowers. Last year, 44 percent of the loans Fannie Mae purchased were from these groups.

The change in policy also comes at the same time that HUD is investigating allegations of racial discrimination in the automated underwriting systems used by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to determine the credit-worthiness of credit applicants.



Posted By: Smokey Burgess
Date Posted: Jul 08 2009 at 9:39am
Please don't forget how those thoughtless Congressional representatatives (both Democrat and Republican) have systematically raided the Social Security Trust Fund for many years!Angry
 
As a nation we're beginning to reap the rewards of "live high on the government dole today and don't worry what the future may bring!"Confused
 
Our local politicians and elitist bureaucrats at One Donham Plaza also seem to be mesmerized by Federal "funny money" stimulus funds as well as the big boys and girls in Washington, D.C. too!Angry


Posted By: Hermes
Date Posted: Jul 08 2009 at 9:45am
Why does everyone want to put blame on Pres. Bush for all the problems ? This goes beyond Bush,it goes all the way back to Clinton and then some. Actually if you look hard enough it goes back to JFK. I'm sick of the democrats blaming a good man like Pres. Bush for this countries problems of being at war,spending the surplus and raiding SS,taking away our rights under the Patriot Act,wire tapping Americans,giving no bid contracts to Halliburton. President Bush kept us safe and gave us tax cuts !!

-------------
No more democrats no more republicans,vote Constitution Party !!


Posted By: lrisner
Date Posted: Jul 08 2009 at 10:07am
Originally posted by Hermes Hermes wrote:

Why does everyone want to put blame on Pres. Bush for all the problems ? This goes beyond Bush,it goes all the way back to Clinton and then some. Actually if you look hard enough it goes back to JFK. I'm sick of the democrats blaming a good man like Pres. Bush for this countries problems of being at war,spending the surplus and raiding SS,taking away our rights under the Patriot Act,wire tapping Americans,giving no bid contracts to Halliburton. President Bush kept us safe and gave us tax cuts !!


Your right, but old GW did his share of the damage.



Print Page | Close Window