Print Page | Close Window

Note To Council

Printed From: MiddletownUSA.com
Category: Middletown City Government
Forum Name: City Council
Forum Description: Discuss individual members and council as a legislative body.
URL: http://www.middletownusa.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1407
Printed Date: Nov 24 2024 at 9:51pm


Topic: Note To Council
Posted By: Pacman
Subject: Note To Council
Date Posted: Jun 10 2009 at 8:52am

Note to Council:

The next time you negotiate a contract with employees look no further than Monroe when you ask the question, "What are other municipalities doing about Health Insurance and premiums paid by employees?"

If you note the red section below you will see that Contract with Unionized employees just ratified by Monroe's City Council has employees paying 14% of their Health Care Premium, which is 2 times what Middletown Employees are paying at 7%.  Yet it is still well below the Federal Goverment Employee Contribution of 25%.
 

Monroe council OKs 3-year deal with union

By Denise Wilson
Staff Writer
1:35 AM Wednesday, June 10, 2009

The city of Monroe has approved a new three-year contract with the union representing its water and street departments.

Council by a 6-0 vote Tuesday, , passed an emergency resolution to authorize City Manager William Brock to enter into a collective bargaining agreement with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 100. Councilman Bob Kelley was absent.

Under the agreement, Brock said 15 employees from the water and street department will receive an annual 3 percent step increase for each three years of the contract, which takes effect July 1, and runs through June 30, 2012.

If warranted, the employees also will receive a merit increase on their anniversary to the next step, Brock said.

The union’s current three-year contract, which began on July 1, 2006, expires on June 30, he said.

Brock said Brad Collins, the city’s director of public works, and himself spent about eight hours working on the agreement.

“It was good negotiations. It went very smoothly and it went very quickly. They were a very good group to work with,” he said.

The union, which has agreed to the new terms, is scheduled to ratify the contract today, , Brock said.

Ron Butts, the union’s representative, could not be reached for comment Tuesday night.

The agreement also calls for union workers to be paid overtime if they must work during a holiday rather than receive holiday time compensation.

Under the deal, Brock said the union’s vacation schedule also has been amended to match the police and fire contracts.

“The vacation accrual schedule is compressed. Employees will now receive an additional week of vacation at 5. 10 and 20 years rather than 8, 15, and 25,” he said.

The employees share of the health insurance costs also will match other bargaining agreements by increasing the union’s share to 14 percent from 12.5 percent beginning Jan. 1, 2010.

In addition, Brock said, the contract increases the clothing allowance for each employee in the union to $150 from $100 annually.




Replies:
Posted By: Middletown News
Date Posted: Jun 10 2009 at 9:47am
Good point Pacman! I don't want any officers mad at me, but the city should not allow wages to rise much with todays economy and high unemployment rates.

-------------
Please like our http://www.facebook.com/middletownusa" rel="nofollow - Middletown USA Facebook Page



Posted By: Smokey Burgess
Date Posted: Jun 10 2009 at 10:03am
Middletown City Council -
 
As mentioned before to Mr. Marconi, Mr. Shiavone and Mr. Armbruster by a long-time City of Middletown employee, you need to ask questions about property located at 1910 Hill Avenue.
 
This property was acquired by the City in 2004 or 2005.  Then, approximately $72,000 was spent for rehabilitation.  Next, it was conveyed in May 2006 along with 10 FHA Dollar Homes to a local non-profit organization.  Then, it was finally sold in early 2008 and the City of Middletown was initially given $4,000+ from the proceeds of the sale.  Next, it was discovered that the local non-profit was keeping 90% of the proceeds because someone working for the city failed to place a mortgage against the property when it was conveyed that would protect the investment of $72,000 in HUD funds.  After negotiations between respective legal representatives, the city did receive another $20,000.  So, this is another example where significant HUD funds were wasted.
 
Miss Vivian, you could have properly used the $45,000+ that city staff wasted on this deal.  It would have given you funds to match the Community Foundation grant to restore the vault at the Historic Pioneer Cemetery.
 
We will see what the Queen of Middletown has to say about this additional waste of HUD funds.AngryAngryAngry



Print Page | Close Window