Middletown Ohio


Find us on
 Google+ and Facebook


 

Home | Yearly News Archive | Advertisers | Blog | Contact Us
Saturday, November 23, 2024
FORUM CITY SCHOOLS COMMUNITY
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Mayors New Rules For Council
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Mayors New Rules For Council

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
spiderjohn View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jul 01 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2749
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spiderjohn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Oct 22 2010 at 7:04am
I would also like to note Mr.Picard's total lack of experience,decorum,respect and incoherent attempts of public speaking and cohesion.
 
Mr.Allen has been far too silent on the issues, and despite his claims of being open to the public, has failed every opportunity to respond to his constituents.
 
While Council was quick to point out the 26 talking heads supporting the PAC as reason for that conformation, they failed to equally weigh the 3 well-respected locally involved citizens who joined with Council minority to offer non-voting alternatives to non-residents being appointed to local boards/commissions. The fact seemed to be lost that NO citizens spoke in favor of this legislation. So--it seems that all it would take to be classified as an out-of-town "expert" would be 4 votes from Council.
 
So--I assume Council/admin needed to rectify the situation of non-locals already serving in these positions in total violation of the existing ordinances.
 
Anyone else notice the filthy/poorly maintained temporary sign in front of the main hangar at the city airport complex?
Back to Top
VietVet View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7008
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VietVet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Oct 22 2010 at 7:10am
VOR- Perfect example of two people looking at the same situation and coming to two very different conclusions.

Your opinion, after observing Ms. Scott-Jones, is a chip on the shoulder. My opinion is that she is constantly asking needed questions, constantly analyzing situations, trying to problem solve and receiving only token answers many times that has become a building frustration for her (as well as many of us citizens). I sense the lady is getting tired of the double-talk, the city policy of talking around a subject that could incriminate them as to their activities. I feel the city hides many things from the citizens or blantantly does what they wish with no regard to what the people want for their city and I believe she senses this also. JMO

You see AJ and Laubach as too young, inexperienced and perhaps too "tender of mind/will. I presume you are not willing to allow them to "settle in" as there is "too much at stake for this city to give a pass to the inexperienced types". I believe they will be more agressive as they gain confidence and gain a mastery of the way the system works. They are new, young people in their first year in a group of seasoned veterans and older people who have developed a sense of confidence over the years. I say give 'em time. At least the first term to adjust.

The statement you used about too inexperienced and youthful is a common one used to describe the new kids on the block that want to upset the apple carts of the old guard incumbants who are in their comfort zones and usually stop serving the people over time because they have the next election "locked up". Look, if you are happy with "old guard" people like Mulligan and Becker and with the newer members (who have made the choice-or have been told to join Mulligan and Becker to keep the majority vote on council) like Allen and Picard, then by all means, support them. I, on the other hand, think the old "inexperienced" argument is a load of crap. Hell, Becker, Mulligan and the other "experienced" people started out where Smith and Laubach are now didn't they? Everyone, including the mighty Johnny Boehner, started out from day one not knowing his a-- from first base, didn't he? New blood is necessary to replace old, stale, never changing/never improving comfortable incumbants. That's why nothing ever gets any better around here. The controlling majority on council will only vote in the manner that the controlling faction tells them to vote. That controlling faction is the old dried up, never changing, stubborn, non open minded individuals that detest progress and want to inhibit any real growth or oppotunities for the town and its people. That's why Middletown is light years behind the times compared to the surrounding communities. No, IMO, it is time to purge the old guard, both on council and with the behind the scenes power group in town who are the real controllers of this town and replace with new, progressive thinking blood, free to offer any and all ideas, without backstabbing resistance, to help us prosper. The deadwood leadership in this town must be purged and that starts with the behind the scenes, faction-backed council members that occupy the current majority. They must go, and then the hierarchy in the city building must go.
Back to Top
angelababy View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident


Joined: Aug 04 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 103
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote angelababy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Oct 31 2010 at 11:17pm
I would say nothing has changed this week over the last meeting and recall is the only way to solve the stalemate and animosity on council and while we are at it put the Commission/Board members being allowed from outside the city as a referendum to the voters.
Back to Top
spiderjohn View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jul 01 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2749
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spiderjohn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Nov 01 2010 at 7:16am
how about excluding all current and former board/commission members who have missed more than 25% of meetings? Hard to get a quorum any more--even on the Master Plan Steering Committee.
Back to Top
VietVet View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7008
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VietVet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Nov 01 2010 at 7:29am
Sounds like we need a "standby list" to call for fill-ins so that the business can continue, with or without original members. Might have to wait for them to show, but at least business decisions could be accomplished and the meeting wouldn't be a total waste of time.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.133 seconds.
Copyright ©2024 MiddletownUSA.com    Privacy Statement  |   Terms of Use  |   Site by Xponex Media  |   Advertising Information