Home | Yearly News Archive | Advertisers | Blog | Contact Us |
|
Friday, November 22, 2024 |
|
CDBG, community development & revitalization |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Mike_Presta
MUSA Council Joined: Apr 20 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3483 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: Sep 29 2009 at 4:58pm |
1. Middletown’s street are in TERRIBLE condition. 2. Good streets attract new businesses, contribute to economic development, and help to draw and retain middle to upper income residents. 3. Street repair is an allowable use for CBDG funds. 4. City Hall has REFUSED and continues to REFUSE to use CBDG funds for street repairs. 5. City Hall has stubbornly allowed CBDG funds to go UNSPENT from year to year. 6. City Hall has channeled CBDG funds towards middle to upper income residents for “beautification” and “restoration” projects that have increased their property values. 7. What is wrong with this picture? |
|
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
|
|
Pacman
Prominent MUSA Citizen Joined: Jun 02 2007 Status: Offline Points: 2612 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
What's wrong......This:
|
|
Hermes
Prominent MUSA Citizen Joined: May 19 2009 Location: Middletown Status: Offline Points: 1637 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
5. City Hall has stubbornly allowed CBDG funds to go UNSPENT from year to year.
(Maybe there are no funds, if there are none then where did it go ?)
4. City Hall has REFUSED and continues to REFUSE to use CBDG funds for street repairs.
(See number #5)
|
|
No more democrats no more republicans,vote Constitution Party !!
|
|
Mike_Presta
MUSA Council Joined: Apr 20 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3483 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
As Councilman Schiavone once said when informed during a council meeting that we would lose these TAXPAYORS' dollars, if not used by the end of the plan period: "We've GOT to SPEND that money!"
(I guess just NOT on streets.)
The problem seemed to be that KOHLER and others earmarked the money for "beautification" projects in the low income South Main Street area, and except for a few of the owners of old MANSIONS on South Main, no one could afford the "match" required, so no one else "applied" for the money, and it went unspent until the "plan" was "amended". I don't know what the amendment was...probably a bike path or the like that would benefit the needy.
|
|
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
|
|
MadisonMom
MUSA Citizen Joined: Dec 09 2008 Location: MadisonTownship Status: Offline Points: 298 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
RE: POTHOLES
Don't play your favorite CD, unless you want to hear rap from all the potholes. My van rattles something awful! |
|
Hermes
Prominent MUSA Citizen Joined: May 19 2009 Location: Middletown Status: Offline Points: 1637 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Mike - I thought they did carry over but thought we were closer to the end of the plan period. What happens to the money if unspent at the end of the 5 years ?
And my next question is, does anyone know for a fact that this money is in the account ? (if of course it wasn't spent already)
|
|
No more democrats no more republicans,vote Constitution Party !!
|
|
Rail Fan
MUSA Resident Joined: Sep 03 2009 Status: Offline Points: 143 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The current five year HUD Consolidated Plan covers the period from May 1, 2005 through April 30, 2010.
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.092 seconds.
Copyright ©2024 MiddletownUSA.com | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Site by Xponex Media | Advertising Information |