Middletown Ohio


Find us on
 Google+ and Facebook


 

Home | Yearly News Archive | Advertisers | Blog | Contact Us
Saturday, November 23, 2024
FORUM CITY SCHOOLS COMMUNITY
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Sign Ordinance Violations
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Sign Ordinance Violations

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
 Rating: Topic Rating: 1 Votes, Average 5.00  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Iron Man View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident
Avatar

Joined: Sep 25 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 112
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Iron Man Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Sign Ordinance Violations
    Posted: Mar 22 2014 at 10:03pm
CITY OF MIDDLETOWN, OHIO
CODE OF ORDINANCES

1272.04  SIGN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

(7)   Election signs.
Political signs not exceeding 32 square feet in outside area, single or double faced, and maximum height of five feet in residential zones or without size restrictions in all other zones. Such sign shall not be animated or illuminated. Such signs shall not be placed earlier than 30 calendar days before any election. Such signs shall be removed by the property owner or lessee within one week following any election. No election sign shall be placed in the public right-of-way.

The election is 45 days from now. These levy campaign signs have been placed on public property all over the city, including in the public right-of-way. I even noticed one in the lot of the MiddletownUSA building.


Back to Top
VietVet View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7008
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VietVet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 23 2014 at 8:47am
Again, contact the Butler Cty Board of Elections/state with a complaint? Pictures of the signs sent to these contacts perhaps?
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.
Back to Top
Iron Man View Drop Down
MUSA Resident
MUSA Resident
Avatar

Joined: Sep 25 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 112
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Iron Man Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 23 2014 at 7:37pm
Good idea, time stamped copies have been sent. It would probably also be helpful if anyone who reads this and believes the pro levy campaign should have to abide by the laws the rest of us have to follow would email this to the news media, City of Middletown, board of elections, city council, etc...

You can click SHARE at the bottom of this post and email it to anyone.

CITY OF MIDDLETOWN, OHIO
CODE OF ORDINANCES

1272.04  SIGN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

(7)   Election signs.
Political signs not exceeding 32 square feet in outside area, single or double faced, and maximum height of five feet in residential zones or without size restrictions in all other zones. Such sign shall not be animated or illuminated. Such signs shall not be placed earlier than 30 calendar days before any election. Such signs shall be removed by the property owner or lessee within one week following any election. No election sign shall be placed in the public right-of-way.

The election is 45 days from now. These levy campaign signs have been placed on public property all over the city, including in the public right-of-way. I even noticed one in the lot of the MiddletownUSA building.


Public property:


Owner permission?


City right-of-way, 1272.04  SIGN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(3)   Right-of-way. No sign or structure other than official highway markers shall be placed within any street or highway right-of-way. The City Manager or his or her designee may remove or cause to be removed any unlawful sign in the public right-of-way.:



Public Property:


Public Property:

Back to Top
VietVet View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7008
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VietVet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 23 2014 at 7:55pm
Nice collection of pics Iron Man. Send 'em in a E-Mail with a few descriptors to the Butler County Board of Elections and to the state dept handling election law perhaps? ......or won't they cite Middletown for violating it's own ordinance?
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.
Back to Top
acclaro View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jul 01 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1878
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote acclaro Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 23 2014 at 11:21pm
Declining MCSD enrollment-  yet new buildings?

Hmmm.....

$40M worth of new schools closed in 3 districts

The districts built the schools based on poor enrollment projections.


 
$40M worth of new schools closed in 3 districts photo
Chester Ray Perkins, 53, of Trotwood takes issue with the Trotwood-Madison School District’s closing of two relatively new elementary schools: Madison Park (shown) and Westbrooke Village. Perkins thinks the district should have known enrollment would decline and the schools wouldn’t have been built.
$40M worth of new schools closed in 3 districts photo
$40M worth of new schools closed in 3 districts
$40M worth of new schools closed in 3 districts photo
Westbrooke Village

About $40 million worth of new schools in three area districts have been taken out of service because projections used to build the facilities grossly miscalculated the student enrollments the districts would have, a Dayton Daily News investigation has found.

The investigation focused on 28 area school districts that have received money from the Ohio School Facilities Commission in the last 13 years to build or renovate schools. The money was part of a huge investment the state made in school buildings in order to meet a court-ordered mandate to make education opportunity and facilities more equal throughout the state.

That added up to more than $17 billion in new school buildings statewide.

The investigation, though, found enrollment projections used to forecast how many buildings were needed proved overly optimistic in three local districts. Trotwood-Madison is closing two elementary schools this fall. The Springfield City School District and Tecumseh Local schools are repurposing a new school building each because they didn’t have the students to fill them. All four buildings opened in 2005 or 2006 and closed in the last two years.

Trotwood resident Chester Ray Perkins, 53, blames district officials for the two empty schools. One, Madison Park Elementary, is in his neighborhood.

“They never should have been built. They knew the population of Trotwood was falling before they built those schools,” he said. “Taxpayers should be going nuts over that deal.”

Multimillion dollar projects

The state of Ohio funded about 80 percent of Springfield’s $195 million project to build 16 new schools, according to OSFC data. It paid 77 percent of Tecumseh’s $93 million, six-building project and $50.3 million of Trotwood’s $90 million, five-building project.

The rest of the projects were funded by local bond issues passed by voters.

Trotwood-Madison City Schools Superintendent Rexann Wagner said she recommended closing Madison Park and Westbrooke Village elementary schools because of the district’s financial woes and the loss of nearly one-fourth of its students. The schools opened five years ago with a price tag of about $10 million each.

Springfield’s Clark Middle School was closed and a portion of the building has been repurposed as offices for administrators and some preschool activities. Tecumseh Superintendent Jim Gay said there are preschool and Head Start activities are also planned at the Medway Elementary School building, which closed as an elementary school in June.

Trotwood’s decision to close its schools stem from not receiving any increased operating revenue since 1996 and losing about 1,000 students in the past decade, Wagner said.

“The board understood that bold action had to be taken,” she said of the school board’s 4-1 vote in January to shutter the schools.

The district worked closely with OSFC in 2001-02 by providing historical enrollment data to the commission, which used a formula to project future enrollment. At the time, the district had five elementary schools. OSFC recommended it build two new elementary schools plus an early learning center for preschool to first grade students.

Wagner said no one could have predicted the economic downturn or dramatic enrollment drop.

“That’s nobody’s fault,” she said. “I’d never want to think I was saying the (OSFC) did not do an accurate job because they did. Nobody could have foreseen what happened economically in the nation and in Trotwood. The impact was huge.”

The district, she noted, is dotted with foreclosed homes.

Enrollment projections off

The original enrollment projections for Springfield, Trotwood and Tecumseh school districts were done by DeJong-Healy, a private contractor based in Dublin and hired by the Ohio School Facilities Commission to provide enrollment forecasts. DeJong-Healy is currently the sole consultant for OSFC projections.

DeJong-Healy predicted Tecumseh’s enrollment would increase from 3,597 in the 2003-04 school year to nearly 4,000 by 2014, according to OSFC data. The district’s enrollment has gone the other way — to 3,147 last year, according to the Ohio Department of Education.

The consultant predicted Springfield’s enrollment would decline from 9,953 in 2000-01 to 9,436 by the 2009-10 school year. Springfield’s actual enrollment was 7,286 last year.

Trotwood-Madison’s enrollment was predicted to decline to 3,021 by the 2009-10 school year by DeJong-Healy. The district had 2,740 students instead.

DeJong-Healy officials declined to comment for this story and referred all questions to the OSFC.

Bill Prenosil, planning director for the OSFC, said he’s “not surprised” some districts have had to close new buildings because, at least early on, the OSFC was still figuring out how to accurately predict enrollment. He said there are just as many school districts, if not more, that were underbuilt and “busting at the seams.”

“Enrollment projection is not an exact science,” he said. “This program (state legislators) put together and we immediately had to go out and do something. They didn’t want us to wait 10 years or even five years and perfect a system. We know we are going to have some of those early districts that are going to be problems.”

Wagner said closing the schools was the “prudent” thing to do because it will save operating dollars and allowed the district to consolidate staffing in the three remaining schools. In all, 41 positions were cut last school year, including 27 teaching and 14 classified jobs. She said the resulting savings from closing the schools is about $3 million, which has enabled the school board to seek a smaller levy in November.

“Passing the levy in November is very necessary to keep the three buildings we have operating,” Wagner said.

Trotwood resident Perkins is angry that the district will be going to the voters with the 4-mill operating levy, which would generate $861,000 annually. It is nearly half the size of the 7.5-mill levy that was narrowly defeated in May. He said he plans to vote against it.

“It’s wasted money to begin with,” he said, referring to the closed schools. “Now they’re saying they want more money because they got no money.”

State officials say the drop in enrollment can be attributed to three factors: the state’s voucher program that allows students in underachieving schools to attend higher-achieving ones, an increase in charter schools and the economic downturn.

Residents upset by closures

Susan Cook, whose four daughters, ages 6, 10, 14 and 17, attend Trotwood-Madison schools, lives on the same street as Westbrooke Village Elementary. It pains her to see the neighborhood school closed.

“They’re brand new schools. Now they are going to sit empty and hopefully not get vandalized,” she said. “Hopefully, they will reopen someday.” The closure has led to a shuffling of her children and other students, who on Monday will begin attending the Union Road campus where the high school, early learning center and elementary school are located.

Now, all district second-graders will go to the early learning center. The middle school has been turned into the elementary school for grades three to six, and seventh- and eighth-graders will be moving into the high school.

Cook, 41, who graduated from Trotwood-Madison High School in 1988, remembered the excitement about the district getting 66 percent of the construction cost for its new schools paid for by the state. She voted for the $35 million bond issue needed to generate the additional 34 percent local share of the project.

Passage of Trotwood’s November levy would not result in reopening the schools, Wagner said, and failure would not result in the closure of more buildings.

Wagner said the district hopes it will be able to reopen the schools but stresses it the decision “will strictly be enrollment driven.

“We’re very hopeful as the economy rebounds families will once again come into Trotwood.”

Tecumseh’s decision to close Medway Elementary this year was due to an unanticipated drop in enrollment and numerous failed levies that left the district with a $2.1 million deficit.

Beginning next week, students in kindergarten and first grade will attend Donnelsville Elementary. Second and third grade will be at Park Layne Elementary and fourth and fifth at New Carlisle Elementary. Medway, which cost about $8 million, will be used for preschool and Head Start programs.

“It was financial,” said Gay, the Tecumseh superintendent . “We’ve had a series of failed levies and we’ve had to make reductions in order to avoid any deficit... By using that approach we were able to save sign dollars in terms of staffing.”

Springfield City Schools was discussing closing two new elementary or one middle school as construction crews were putting the finishing touches on its $64 million high school that opened in 2009.

The recommendation came from the state’s Financial Planning and Supervision Commission after the district was placed in fiscal emergency by the state auditor’s office.

Board members opted instead to change all elementaries to K-6 and close Clark Middle School.

“By realigning facilities ...we were able to reduce our district’s operating costs by $500,000 to $700,000 per year,” said Kim Fish, communications consultant for Springfield City Schools.

Clark was built to serve 527 students based on enrollment projections at a cost of about $10 million. There were about 300 students in the building when it closed, Fish said.

The district has combined its preschool programs into Clark, which hosts 429 kids throughout the year.

“In Springfield, preschool is a critical part of our whole education program,” said Superintendent David Estrop.

The closing of Clark remains a sore point for some in the neighborhood. Rachel Sumpter has two children in the district and was vice president of Clark’s booster organization when it closed.

“They made a mistake closing the school,” she said.

Sumpter believes some of the elementary schools are overcrowded after sixth graders were moved back to the elementary building to accommodate the closing of Clark and that preschoolers would be better suited in their neighborhood building where they can get familiar with the school before kindergarten.

OSFC taking hard-line stance

OSFC officials said they have become more conservative in their enrollment projections to prevent scenarios like the ones in Springfield and Trotwood.

The OSFC, funded primarily with state-issued bonds, still has marching orders to provide all 611 school districts and vocational schools in the state the opportunity to build new schools with state assistance.

DeJong-Healy has a two-year, $500,000 contract with the state with an option for renewal in 2012 to continue as the state’s sole projections consultant.

Prenosil said the commission has taken a harder stance with districts that are next in line for school construction assistance and promise to improve and attract new students.

“It makes some districts angry when we project their enrollment to decline and they say, ‘You are planning us for failure, we are trying to improve it,’ ” Prenosil said. “It makes us look like bad guys and they are not happy. But we are doing better (with the projections) and (districts) are starting to realize we know a little more than what they think we do.”

As new projects arise, Prenosil said, districts will have to provide irrefutable evidence to change the OSFC’s enrollment projections.

“The fact is Ohio is losing children and districts are losing kids,” he said. “We are trying to hit the mark and, especially in this economy, we’ve learned we have to be conservative about the projections because the last thing we want to do is waste money.”


New schools by the numbers

314: School districts and joint vocational schools that have received money to renovate or build new buildings since the Ohio School Facilities Commission started in 1997. There are 611 school districts (not counting vocational schools) in the state.

1,043: New or renovated buildings completed or in the process of being built funded partly with OSFC money.

$10.4 million: Average state subsidy for new or renovated school buildings under OSFC program

$16.4 million: Average cost for renovated or new buildings, including local money

$2 billion: Money spent to date in the Dayton area’s 28 school districts to build or renovate schools under the OSFC program

$10.9 billion: State’s cost to build or renovate 1,043 buildings in 314 school districts and joint vocational schools

Source: Ohio School Facilities Commission

--------------------

What is the OSFC?

The Ohio School Facilities Commission was created by the legislature in 1997 in response to a state Supreme Court decision that the state’s system for funding building maintenance was unconstitutional and caused a negative impact on poorer districts.

The OSFC handles the oversight of the building projects and awards assistance based on a district’s financial need.

Legislators appropriated about $300 million in construction aid to school districts. In 1999 then Gov. Bob Taft switched funding for the program, using $10.2 billion Ohio received from a lawsuit settlement with the country’s four largest tobacco companies over their marketing practices. Ohio now issues bonds to fund the program.

The state projected then it would cost about $23 billion over 12 years to rebuild Ohio’s schools. Ohio has spent nearly $11 billion since 1997 to rebuild schools in a little less than half of the state’s 611 districts.


'An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.' - Winston Churchill
Back to Top
Mike_Presta View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: Apr 20 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3483
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Mike_Presta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 24 2014 at 12:01am
Campaign signs fall under the City of Middletown's sign ordinance (which Iron Man cited above). It will do no good to contact the County Board of Elections or the State, as they have no authority to enforce Middletown's City Ordinances. It is up to the City of Middletown to enforce their own ordinances.

Also, the public "right-of-way" generally ends at the outside of the sidewalk. Signs on the "street side" of the sidewalk would be illegal...signs on the other side of the sidewalk would be legal. (No signs would be legal more than 31 days before the election ore more than 7 days after the election.

Getting the City to enforce the ordinance is another story. In the past, the City has zealously removed illegally-placed signs for candidates who they opposed while leaving the illegal signs of favored candidates in the same locations. Since the City Manager is in favor of the levy, and all council members have always favored all tax levies, I doubt that any of the illegally placed levy signs will be removed.
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
Back to Top
TonyB View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen


Joined: Jan 12 2011
Location: Middletown, OH
Status: Offline
Points: 631
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TonyB Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 24 2014 at 8:18am
I have a question about the signs. Would it be legal for citizens to enfore the sign ordinance? In other words, could I take down illegal signs based on the ordinance?
Back to Top
acclaro View Drop Down
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Jul 01 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1878
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote acclaro Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 24 2014 at 9:19am
The appropriate remedy is to put a disagreeing sign of opposition besides the one in place. Of course, it is doubtful there is an organized group that has signs in opposition.

Next, you could call the cit prosecutor and determine if the ordinance is adhered. If not, you could file a complaint with the Disciplinary Board at the Ohio Supreme Court.

The tag line so ineffective, I see no harm really. Who wants to help replace a perfectly good building? On one hand, Middletown espouses the fact they treasure history and aged buildings. On the other, they want to tear it down to get their hands on some nominal state money, while soaking the tax payer with $55 Mm. Pretty ineffective.
'An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.' - Winston Churchill
Back to Top
Mike_Presta View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: Apr 20 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3483
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mike_Presta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 24 2014 at 9:29am
TonyB:

That's an interesting question!!! If you want to try, here would be my suggestions:

1. Stick with signs that are in the public right-of-way. Do NOT remove any signs on private property (or even public property such as school yards) that are outside the public right-of-way. You COULD be charged with trespassing, or even more serious offenses.

2. Carefully remove the signs. If you damage them, you COULD be charged under other ordinances.

3. After removing a sign, leave it where it is. If you take it with you, you COULD be charged with some sort of theft offense.

4. Be careful where you stop your car (if you are driving). You COULD be cited for a number of traffic offenses such as illegal parking, impeding traffic, etc.

Other than that, you might be okay. It might be considered similar to making a citizen's arrest. At worst, I would think you would get off with a warning...at least the FIRST time.
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
Back to Top
Paul Nagy View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen


Joined: Jan 11 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 384
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Paul Nagy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 24 2014 at 9:54am
TonyB,
      Please proceed with caution. Mike Presta and I and others have been through this a number of times.
I recommend you take Acclaro's advice and call the city prosecutor (not city attorney).  I will be surprised if anything is done but at least then it becomes a matter of record. I don't agree with the idea that it is not significant. We, indeed, do have people in the city and school administration who beieve they are above the law.  Getting these types of acts on the record is important. This way you do not put yourself in jeopardy. Good luck.
      pn
Back to Top
over the hill View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Oct 19 2012
Location: middletown
Status: Offline
Points: 952
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote over the hill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 24 2014 at 10:10am
calling the prosecutors office only gets you an advocates voice mail. Try the law dept. or how about the police.
Back to Top
over the hill View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Oct 19 2012
Location: middletown
Status: Offline
Points: 952
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote over the hill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 24 2014 at 11:10am
why don't we just call the board of education or the superintendent and ask them if they realize they are in violation?
Back to Top
ktf1179 View Drop Down
MUSA Citizen
MUSA Citizen
Avatar

Joined: Mar 19 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 518
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ktf1179 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Mar 24 2014 at 6:46pm
Springboro is also missing enrollment projections. In fact they have shut down Jonathan Wright Elementary School Entirely. It is not even listed on the website.

http://www.springboro.org/SchoolsList.aspx

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.098 seconds.
Copyright ©2024 MiddletownUSA.com    Privacy Statement  |   Terms of Use  |   Site by Xponex Media  |   Advertising Information