Home | Yearly News Archive | Advertisers | Blog | Contact Us |
|
Saturday, November 23, 2024 |
|
What could it be??? |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Mike_Presta
MUSA Council Joined: Apr 20 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3483 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: Jan 30 2011 at 3:24am |
What could it be??? The most interesting items in this week’s workbook (for the Tuesday, 02/01/2011 Council meeting) were in the portion containing the minutes of City Council “Retreat” held on Saturday, January 22. First, even though Councilman Smith is listed as being “present” for the roll call at the start of the meeting, there is also a notation that he did not arrive until after the discussion of the “Rules of Council”, at 9:35. It will be interesting to note at Tuesday’s meeting if anyone bothers to correct the record. Either Councilman Smith was present at the start for roll call and for the discussion of Council Rules or he did not arrive until later. Next, KUDOS to Chief Botts for saying: “you have to understand that the first part of solving or fixing the problem is to acknowledge the problem.” Regular readers of this forum should know that I agree with this view, regardless of to which problem Chief Botts was referring. Next, there was a discussion of the “new” Master Plan. Mr. Kohler stated that: “he is working on drafting the text of the update”. You all should know by now that if Mr. Kohler is drafting the “update” to the “new” Master Plan, it will end up being the same as the last several OLD new master plans, and nothing “new” will result from it, and more taxpayer funds will be thrown down the same old rat holes, with the same old hands stuck into the same old cookie jars while the same old eyes look the same old other ways. A public safety initiative was discussed, but not much was recorded in these minutes. Hmm??? Ms. Phillips discussed public health in Middletown. Our Public Health Department may be the BRIGHTEST light in our City Hall chandelier. They seem to do quite a lot with very little, and actually do seem to put needs ahead of wants. They also seem to assist the needy and powerless, as opposed to the wealthy and powerful. Kudos to Ms. Phillips and her associates!!! Mr. Duritsch said that: “roads have been a priority of council and the community”!!! He might have “said” that, but saying it doesn’t make it so. Drive around our city and tell me if you believe it!!! Of course, help seems to be on the way this year in our neediest areas of Highlands, Thorn Hill, and Rosedale (via HUD annual action plan), and the rest of us can pay for our own if we want improvement!!! Later, Ms. Gilleland suggested a $1.2 MILLION per year tax (hidden as a “street light assessment") to be used for streets or public safety. Ms. Gilleland also asked if Council wanted to “pursue a public safety levy". "There were six council members in agreement and one that said no.” KUDOS to the one who said “NO”. He/she “gets it”!!! MOST IMPORTANTLY (at least in my view): Ms. Gilleland:
So, just what are these things that Ms. Gilleland and "the majority" of Council feel should NOT be discussed in front of all Middletonians??? Just what is it that they think should be kept secret from us??? Are there things that they are ashamed of??? Are there things going on that they think that we, the public, are too stupid to understand??? Why are they afraid of having all discussions of City business recorded by TV Middletown “for the record” and available to the public…the very public that pays the bills for their decisions, right or wrong??? What could it be??? |
|
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
|
|
Mike_Presta
MUSA Council Joined: Apr 20 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3483 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
And shouldn't there be a vote, a roll call vote in the legislative portion of the council meeting, to make this change???
Shouldn't EACH and EVERY member of City Council be on the record as being "FOR" or "AGAINST" trying to keep this discussion of public business as far out of the eyes and ears of the public as possible???
Shouldn't their constituents KNOW in how little regard they are held so that they can keep it mind the next time these politicians ask for their TRUST and their VOTES to be their representatives???
And please recall the last time this was foisted on the public!!! Even after promises were made to the contrary, DECISIONS were made and votes were held "upstairs" out of sight and out of mind.
Perhaps those ELECTED (or appointed) members of council who are AFRAID to discuss CITY BUSINESS openly in front of their constituents should RESIGN in favor of others who are not afraid to do so???
|
|
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
|
|
Vivian Moon
MUSA Council Joined: May 16 2008 Location: Middletown, Ohi Status: Offline Points: 4187 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Mr. Presta
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.086 seconds.
Copyright ©2024 MiddletownUSA.com | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Site by Xponex Media | Advertising Information |