Home | Yearly News Archive | Advertisers | Blog | Contact Us |
|
Saturday, November 23, 2024 |
|
Tonight's Council meeting |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Mike_Presta
MUSA Council Joined: Apr 20 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3483 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: May 03 2011 at 7:52pm |
BWA HA HA HA!!! I laughed so hard I nearly soiled my pants when the City Law Director gave his little speech about how he has a duty to advise council when they are about to break a law and to report when they do break the law!!!
What hypocrisy. Who does he think he is fooling???
|
|
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
|
|
Mike_Presta
MUSA Council Joined: Apr 20 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3483 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hey counselor!!!
Here are a couple of laws for you!!!
From the City of Middletown’s Codified Ordinances: “§ 220.09 SALE OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY.
From the Ohio Revised Code: Chapter 721: SALE OR LEASE OF PROPERTY
No contract, except as provided in section 721.28 of the Revised Code, for the sale or lease of real estate belonging to a municipal corporation shall be made unless authorized by an ordinance, approved by a two-thirds vote of the members of the legislative authority of such municipal corporation, and by the board or officer having supervision or management of such real estate. When the contract is so authorized, it shall be made in writing by such board or officer, and, except as provided in section 721.27 of the Revised Code, only with the highest bidder, after advertisement once a week for five consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation within the municipal corporation. Such board or officer may reject any bids and readvertise until all such real estate is sold or leased.Gee, counselor, do you or either of the two other attornies in the room recall these laws being followed in say, oh, the case of the sale of THE JOHN ROSS BUILDING to Mr. VERDIN, for example????
|
|
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
|
|
Mike_Presta
MUSA Council Joined: Apr 20 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3483 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hey Counselor, now that you seem to have gotten religon about following state law, perhaps you should have another look at the HISTORIC COMMISSION ordinance and the workings of the Historic Commission OUTSIDE of defined Historic Districts!!!
|
|
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
|
|
Mike_Presta
MUSA Council Joined: Apr 20 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3483 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hey counselor!!! Now that you seem to be taking your role of an "officer of the court" seriously, would you like to revisit the memo found in the City Manager's office regarding ELECTIONEERING by MMF???
|
|
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
|
|
Mike_Presta
MUSA Council Joined: Apr 20 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3483 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hey Counselor!!! Regarding the recently sold city-owned properties on Elmo Place, Gage Drive, and 14th Street:
Remember, Counselor, you have a duty as an officer of the court to report violations of law!!! |
|
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
|
|
Mike_Presta
MUSA Council Joined: Apr 20 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3483 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Oh yes!!! Also for the THREE "officers of the court" at last night's city council meeting:
I noticed that that a motion was passed to go to "executive session" in order to consider the:
of a public employee or official.
ORC 121.22 has been interpreted to require the stating of exactly which of these items will be discussed, and not to simply provide a "laundry list" from which to choose.
Mr. Landen, I realize it will be a sad day, but exactly how soon will you be reporting this breech of law by your two fellow members of the bar (and YOURSELF, of course, for not warning council against this)??? |
|
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
|
|
Mike_Presta
MUSA Council Joined: Apr 20 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3483 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
For the benefit of the officers of the court:
Last night's executive session (as are most of this council's executive sessions) was held:
From ORC 121.22 (G)(1):
“…If a public body holds an executive session pursuant to division (G)(1) of this section, the motion and vote to hold that executive session shall state which one or more of the approved purposes listed in division (G)(1) of this section are the purposes for which the executive session is to be held. …” |
|
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
|
|
Mike_Presta
MUSA Council Joined: Apr 20 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3483 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hmm...
Why would council want to discuss "appointing" or "employing" someone if they are already considering "disciplining" and "dismissing" that same person??? Likewise, why consider "promoting" someone that you are considering "disciplining", "demoting" or "dismissing"??? And why is "compensation" an issue if you are going to fire the bum??? Then again, who am I to expect the City Law Director's intepretation of the law to make sense??? |
|
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
|
|
Mike_Presta
MUSA Council Joined: Apr 20 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3483 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Kudos to Ms. Scott-Jones for calling out Mr. Landen, Esq., on his past (but erroneous) pattern of claiming that "Home Rule trumps state law"!!!
Also, kudos to Mr. Laubach for standing his ground on the financial aspect of his votes on the labor contracts, and making it clear that it was about finances and not about "worth", safety, or any of the other social issues that Mr. Smith tried to introduce into the mix. This is a tough issue, and a tough call...and a "yes" vote could have been justified for the reasons that some of the others mentioned (the uncertainty, and possibly worse financial impact of resulting in binding arbitration, etc.) However, no one is advocating depriving either police or fire of safety equipment, etc., and Mr. Smith should not have introduced such items,--or "class size" (note to AJ: the teachers' contract is under the jurisdiction of the School Board, not the City Council)--into the mix.
|
|
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
|
|
VietVet
MUSA Council Joined: May 15 2008 Status: Offline Points: 7008 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
MIDDLETOWN — A debate regarding the costs of improving Lefferson Road led some City Council members to debate whether to break state law
Vice Mayor Bill Becker pointed out the city had been “breaking the law” since the 1980s, adding he felt the state requirement was “unreasonable.” WHAT? BREAKING THE LAW SINCE THE 80'S? Councilmen Tom Allen and Dan Picard, both attorneys, were visibly uncomfortable by the discussion. Landen said it would be against their oath and his oath as an attorney to not follow what is state law. LESLIE SAYS IT WOULD BE AGAINST THEIR OATH AND HIS OATH AS AN ATTORNEY TO NOT FOLLOW WHAT IS STATE LAW- YOU GOTTA BE KIDDING ME LES BABES!!!!!! YOU ARE THE BIGGEST PERPETRATOR OF BREAKING THE LAWS, ESPECIALLY IN INTERPRETING THOSE LAWS AS IT APPLIES TO THE CITY. WHAT A “I am simply advising you there is an obligation to follow the law,” he said. THAT DOESN'T SOUND LIKE THE LES WE HAVE COME TO KNOW, DOES IT? Health Commissioner Jackie Phillips, whose department brought the law to the city’s attention and whose job it is to enforce it, said she would “absolutely not” turn her head from the law. HOW NOBLE OF YOU TO SAY THAT, MS. PHILLIPS. In the end, City Council voted unanimously to approve an estimated $6,000 assessment to homeowners to repair the road, install and connect homes to the new sewer line and add concrete curbs, gutters, and driveway aprons to the 42 properties on Lefferson Road. The city agreed to remove sidewalks from the project and waive a sewer line connection fee, saving homeowners about $5,500 total. Public Works Director Dave Duritsch said residents have the option of having the work assessed to their property taxes over the next 20 years, equating to about $35 a month. THAT'S WORKING WITH THE CITIZENS AND LISTENING TO WHAT THEY DESIRE CITY COUNCIL....NICE COOPERATION. JUST FORCE IT ON THEM IN TOUGH ECONOMIC TIMES WITH NO REGARD FOR THEIR ABILITY TO PAY. NO MATTER THAT IT CREATES A FINANCIAL HARDSHIP FOR THEM. |
|
Richard Saunders
MUSA Resident Joined: Jun 30 2010 Status: Offline Points: 232 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
"As an officer of the court, I report all violations of the law." -- Leslie Landen
"Beware of quotes found on the internet. Many are not genuine." -- Benjamin Franklin
|
|
TonyB
MUSA Citizen Joined: Jan 12 2011 Location: Middletown, OH Status: Offline Points: 631 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Isn't there something in the oath that you swear to become a city councilperson about "obeying the law"? Is there a statute of limitations for city councilmembers for violations of the law? Indeed, doesn't the admission of violation of the law constitute a "resignation" from council for said violation? Does that mean that the current council is in violation of the laws of the city and in contempt of the laws of this city and the state of Ohio? Someone needs to contact the state AG about this. I'll state my usual mantra; wrong is wrong!!! If you knowingly violated the law, you are guilty of malfeisance and not eligible to hold the public trust and the office you occupy!!! I believe that resignations and an immediate special election is in order!!!
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.129 seconds.
Copyright ©2024 MiddletownUSA.com | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Site by Xponex Media | Advertising Information |