![]() |
Home | Yearly News Archive | Advertisers | Blog | Contact Us |
|
![]() |
Saturday, September 7, 2024 |
|
Bond Issue |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2345> |
Author | |
ktf1179 ![]() MUSA Citizen ![]() ![]() Joined: Mar 19 2012 Status: Offline Points: 518 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I hate to say this Vet. but the new generation of adults and kids are now wimps.
They have grown up in homes and cars with A/C on all the time. And if they have to spend any time in the heat, they complain about it. When I went to school in Springboro back in the 80's and 90's our elementary and Junior High Schools did not have Air Conditioning either, only the high school did. And in High school they kept it so cold we couldn't wait to get back into the heat :) lol But I do agree the heat in the schools are probably worse now because of the new computers, projectors and electronics in the classrooms. And if you have those high temperatures mixed with electronics, you are asking for something to break, or overheat. That and the schools are risking a lawsuit if a child has to go to the hospital for heat related illness. That's why I hate to say it but I have a feeling that the level will pass considering it is a relatively low millage compared to other new schools. That and the school is now over 90+ years old. My question was why wasn't the school updated and added Air Conditioning decades ago when it would have been cheaper to do so? |
|
![]() |
|
Bocephus ![]() MUSA Citizen ![]() Joined: Jun 04 2009 Status: Offline Points: 838 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I hope they can build this school without me or mine voting for any new taxes. |
|
![]() |
|
VietVet ![]() MUSA Council ![]() ![]() Joined: May 15 2008 Status: Offline Points: 7008 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
ktf1179:
"My question was why wasn't the school updated and added Air Conditioning decades ago when it would have been cheaper to do so?" IF THEY HAD DONE AS YOU SUGGEST AND ADDED AIR CONDITIONING, IT WOULD HAVE TAKEN AWAY THEIR CLAIMS THAT THE SCHOOL IS TOO OLD AND PAST IT'S TIME AND IT WOULD HAVE NEGATED THEIR ARGUMENT FOR GOING WITH THE CURRENT THEME OF "ALL NEW SCHOOLS WILL HELP THE KIDS LEARN MORE EFFECTIVELY" IF THEY WOULD HAVE SPENT MONEY ON AIR-CONDITIONING THE OLD HIGH SCHOOL YEARS AGO, THEY WOULD HAVE HAD TO EXPLAIN WHY THEY PUT MONEY INTO A BUILDING THAT OLD AND OUTDATED. THEY ALREADY SPENT A FORTUNE ON THE NEW WINDOWS.(SPEAKING OF NEW WINDOWS... ROOSEVELT HAD THEM INSTALLED SEVERAL YEARS AGO AND I BELIEVE THE NEW WINDOWS WENT THE WAY OF THE DEMOLITION DUMP TRUCKS WHEN ROOSEVELT WAS TORN DOWN. WONDER IF THEY BELIEVE THEY GOT THEIR MONEY'S WORTH OUT OF THOSE WINDOWS? ktf1179: "That's why I hate to say it but I have a feeling that the level will pass considering it is a relatively low millage compared to other new schools" BUT WE THE VOTERS SHOULDN'T BE CONCERNED WITH THE OTHER SCHOOLS. WE SHOULD BE CONCERNED WITH WHETHER WE ARE GETTING OUR MONEY'S WORTH FROM THE FUNDS WE HAVE PLOWED INTO THIS DISTRICT SO FAR. THE TAXPAYER SHOULD JUDGE WHETHER THEIR MONEY SPENT TO DATE HAS BEEN A GOOD DEAL OR NOT, RIGHT? IF SO, KEEP GIVING THEM WHAT THEY ASK FOR. IF NOT, TIME TO SHUT DOWN THE MONEY FLOW. ANYONE THINK THE NEW ELEMENTARIES WERE A GOOD DEAL FOR THE MONEY? ktf1179: "I hate to say this Vet. but the new generation of adults and kids are now wimps" SO HOW'S THAT KINDER/GENTLER/PAMPERED/TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOURSELF WORKING OUT FOR ALL OF US NOW? READY TO CHANGE COURSE YET OR HAVEN'T WE ALL HAD ENOUGH? |
|
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.
|
|
![]() |
|
itsamee ![]() MUSA Resident ![]() ![]() Joined: May 03 2013 Location: Middletown Status: Offline Points: 154 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I know I am late to the party, but I vote no on the new buildings right now. I just got my tax increase for bailing out the SR. Center. Sorry schools, you will need to wait. I'm tired of paying for ya'll
|
|
Itsa me, mario!
|
|
![]() |
|
ktf1179 ![]() MUSA Citizen ![]() ![]() Joined: Mar 19 2012 Status: Offline Points: 518 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You know they could fund the new schools without adding taxes, if they force the city to work on raising property values in the city and enforcing the ordinances bystrictly going after all the people who violate them. There are too many people who live in Middletown that either don't have the money, or just don't give a crap about making there houses and properties look good anymore. Instead you have junk cars parked on the streets, gutters hanging down, dead trees in there front yards, and in some cases they have appliances, and ATV's parked on there front yards. These are the people who are dragging down propery values and thus reducing the amount of money to the City and the Schools.
|
|
![]() |
|
Perplexed ![]() MUSA Citizen ![]() Joined: Apr 22 2009 Status: Offline Points: 315 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I thought that the Doogmeister's code enforcement blitzkrieg was supposed to remedy these problems in residential neighborhoods? Whatever happened to the 2,300 properties that were cited for violations back in 2009? It seems that he is more preoccupied with so-called downtown projects, property demolition and S. Main Street. After all, he is now the Community Demolition Prosecutor.
|
|
![]() |
|
VietVet ![]() MUSA Council ![]() ![]() Joined: May 15 2008 Status: Offline Points: 7008 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I agree ktf....didn't use to be this way three or four decades ago. People actually had jobs, wanted to work, had a little disposable income for upkeep and took pride in their homes and neighborhoods. Guess the only solution is to call Gilleland and her crew and encourage them to add more low income and Section 8 candidates. Let's go for the complete destruction of the city. Let's get that voucher number off the charts! Meanwhile.... does seem like since Gilleland's people started accepting any and all to Section 8/low incomeland, and when we first learned that we have an abundance of heroin in town, the town started looking a little ghetto..ish didn't it? (with the exception of the Highlands, the S. Main St. area and other selected areas of town, primarily in the north/northeast). Alot of things dragging down the property values here with the condition of the city, the school performance, the way the town is run and it's reputation primary players in the equation. |
|
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.
|
|
![]() |
|
processor ![]() MUSA Resident ![]() Joined: May 07 2013 Status: Offline Points: 151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
kft179,
I don't disagree with anything that you said regarding property values, but it would not generate the money the schools need for the new/re-habbed buildings. The original bond levy is for a fixed dollar amount. If property values go up then the millage drops so that the total dollars to the school district to pay the bonds stays the same. Most of the operating levy's are the same way. They are for fixed dollar amount not for a particular millage. Plus legally the operating money and bond money can not be comingled. |
|
![]() |
|
VietVet ![]() MUSA Council ![]() ![]() Joined: May 15 2008 Status: Offline Points: 7008 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Journal story concerning the renovations going on at Barnitz Stadium...
Home > NewsSponsored By:Posted: 2:10 p.m. Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2013 Final design stage begins for Barnitz Stadium renovations Katrina Fugate, head coach for girls soccer, said the varsity and junior varsity teams played their first games on the synthetic turf this past weekend. She said the players were apprehensive to the change at first, but were pleased with the quality of the field. “It’s the new hot thing and they can’t wait to be on the field as much as possible,” Fugate said, adding all games will be played at Barnitz in the 2014-15 season QUESTION.... IF THE GIRL'S SOCCER TEAM WILL START PLAY EXCLUSIVELY AT BARNITZ IN 2014-2015, AND THE BOYS TEAM WILL PROBABLY FOLLOW, WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO THE CURRENT SOCCER FIELD IN FRONT OF THE CURRENT HIGH SCHOOL IF THE BOND LEVY DOESN'T PASS AND THE CHANGES AND RECONFIGURATION OF THE ATHLETIC FIELDS ARE NO LONGER AN OPTION? TURN IT INTO MORE PARKING OR KEEP IT AS A PRACTICE FIELD EVEN THOUGH THE GRASS IS DIFFERENT THAN THE BARNITZ TURF? |
|
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.
|
|
![]() |
|
VietVet ![]() MUSA Council ![]() ![]() Joined: May 15 2008 Status: Offline Points: 7008 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Journal....
Payroll deductions for school levy campaigns questioned School districts that deduct money from employee paychecks to help fund levy campaigns are not breaking the law by doing so, according to the chief legal counsel for the Ohio School Board Association. But a state anti-tax group claims the practice is an illegal use of resources and personnel of publicly funded schools. Officials with the Cincinnati-based Coalition Opposed to Additional Spending and Taxes (COAST) say they are exploring whether to take legal action to stop school districts from engaging in the activity Hollie Reedy, OSBA’s chief legal counsel, said Ohio Revised Code Section 3599.031 allows school districts to make certain types of voluntary payroll deductions for employees to support a ballot issue. She said this is different from ORC Section 3315.07, which prohibits districts from using public funds to support or oppose the passage of a school levy or bond issue or to pay an employee for time spent on any activity to influence the outcome of a levy or bond issue OK, TEACHERS ARE PAID USING TAXPAYER DOLLARS RIGHT? THE TEACHER TURNS RIGHT AROUND AND DONATES SOME OF THEIR SALARY (TAXPAYER MONEY) TO SUPPORT SCHOOL AND BOND LEVIES. THE MONEY FROM TAXPAYERS IS "FILTERED" THROUGH THE TEACHER IN SALARY, BUT WHEN DONATED, ENDS UP BEING THE SAME AS DIRECT TAXPAYER MONEY GOING TO SUPPORT SCHOOL LEVIES, WHICH IS A DIRECT VIOLATION OF ORC SECTION 3315.07 LISTED ABOVE. LOOKS LIKE WE HAVE TWO SECTIONS HERE THAT ARE IN CONFLICT WITH EACH OTHER DEPENDING ON HOW ONE WISHES TO INTERPRET THEM. IT IS NOT CORRECT TO USE PUBLIC MONEY TO SUPPORT SCHOOL LEVIES AS IT INFRINGES ON THE RIGHTS OF THOSE WHO OPPOSE THOSE LEVIES, HELPING ONLY THOSE WHO SUPPORT THE SCHOOLS. FAIRNESS? |
|
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.
|
|
![]() |
|
Observer ![]() MUSA Immigrant ![]() Joined: Dec 08 2009 Status: Offline Points: 46 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If their donation was a required condition of their employment that creates a serious issue, but i don't think that's what is happening here. I don't know much more than what was posted here but i don't see how this is all that different than if a teacher wrote a check to the campaign committee out of his/her personal checking account. The teacher salary would still have been paid with public funds. I would think telling teachers they can't voluntarily support a levy campaign would be a free speech violation.
|
|
![]() |
|
Miss Kitty ![]() MUSA Immigrant ![]() ![]() Joined: Oct 29 2012 Status: Offline Points: 61 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
TEACHERS ARE OVER PAID!
We don't need new schools. We need to take care of the ones we have. VOTE NO FOR THE LEVEY!!!!!! |
|
![]() |
|
VietVet ![]() MUSA Council ![]() ![]() Joined: May 15 2008 Status: Offline Points: 7008 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
And so here we go again, with the same message, just coming from a different super this time......Journal story....
Ison: ‘Now is the time’ to pass levy MIDDLETOWN — Sam Ison, superintendent of the Middletown City School District, said “now is the time” for residents on Nov. 5 to approve Issue 9, a $55 million bond issue that would provide the funds to build a middle school and renovate the high school. He said for the district to be eligible for a $40 million grant from the Ohio Facilities Commission, voters must pass the levy within the next 13 months. Otherwise, he said, another district that passes its levy would be eligible for the money. As Ison said: “The clock is ticking.” The entire project is expected to cost about $95 million, Ison said. He said the 3.95-mill bond issue and a 0.26-mill permanent improvement levy would allow the district to build the middle school on the high school grounds on South Breiel Boulevard and make additions and renovations to the 44-year-old high school. SO THE MESSAGE HERE FROM ISON IS THAT THE DEPENDENCY FOR PASSING A LEVY IS ALL CENTERED ON A TIMELINE TO ALLOW THE STATE TO PAY FOR A PORTION. NO MENTION HERE ABOUT A PLAN AFTER THE NEW SCHOOLS ARE BUILT TO IMPROVE THE DISTRICT PERFORMANCE. BASICALLY AND FOREMOST, "PASS THE LEVY BECAUSE WE WILL LOSE THE MONEY IF YOU DON'T AND WE WON'T GET WHAT WE WANT". IT WOULDN'T BE "PASS THE LEVY TO HELP US IMPROVE" BECAUSE ISON KNOWS THAT THE LAST TIME THEY ASKED THE VOTERS TO BUILD 'EM NEW SCHOOLS, IT DIDN'T YIELD ANY FAVORABLE RESULTS IN THE ELEMENTARIES. He said the technology needs to be improved at the high school so the students can “get up to par.” SO, JUST LIKE THE THEME THAT PRICE SOLD THE VOTERS ON WITH HIS "NEW SCHOOLS WILL IMPROVE PERFORMANCE BECAUSE IT WILL PROVIDE THE LATEST IN TECHNOLOGY" THEME, ISON IS TAKING THE SAME ROUTE WITH HIS "TECHNOLOGY NEEDS TO BE IMPROVED SO THAT STUDENTS CAN "GET UP TO PAR" (WHATEVER THAT MEANS) THEME. SOUNDS LIKE A BROKEN RECORD FROM BOTH SUPERS. YOU ALL HAVE SEEN WHAT THE NEW ELEMENTARIES HAVE PRODUCED FOR 45 MILLION. ARE YOU STILL WILLING TO GIVE THE SCHOOL PEOPLE WHAT THEY WANT A SECOND TIME?......SERIOUSLY? IF SO, WHAT WOULD IT TAKE TO CHANGE YOUR MIND TO SEE THAT THIS "BUILD EVERYTHING NEW AND ALL WILL IMPROVE" SCENARIO HAS NOT MADE A DIFFERENCE TO DATE? DO YOU FEEL YOU HAVE GOTTEN ANYTHING FOR YOUR MONEY AS YET? ISON: "Safety issues also are a concern at the high school, he said. He said the improvements would benefit the district, but also the Middletown community" AHH, ANOTHER ANGLE TO SELL THE LEVY....SAFETY. AND JUST HOW WOULD THE IMPROVEMENTS BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY MR. ISON? NEW SCHOOLS WILL STILL NOT TRUMP THE REPUTATION AS A POOR PERFORMER. THE NEWEST CAR ON THE BLOCK, WITH ALL THE BELLS AND WHISTLES IS WORTHLESS IF THE CAR WON'T RUN. THE TABLE HAS ALREADY BEEN SET ON THIS DISTRICT AS TO SURROUNDING COMMUNITY PERCEPTION ABOUT YOUR SCHOOLS. THEY ARE NOT CONSIDERED BY POTENTIAL RESIDENTS BECAUSE OF THE DISCIPLINE ISSUES AND THE PERFORMANCE. HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH CONTENT, NOT SURFACE FLUFF. “It’s all of us together,” said Ison, who added a passed levy would be “advantageous” to the community SEE ABOVE Ison, in his first year as superintendent, said Middletown could be one of the few districts in the country with seventh graders through seniors on the same campus with a college, Miami University Middletown, across the street AND, THE POINT IS? WHAT IS THAT SUPPOSE TO DO TO HELP ACCOMPLISH IMPROVEMENT? The levy would cost the owner of a $75,000 home about $9.21 per month. Ferrell said that equates to about 30 cents a day, which is “very minimal.” YEP, ABOUT A CUP AND A HALF OF STARBUCKS A MONTH. A QUARTER OF A TANK OF GAS A MONTH OR 9 DOUBLE CHEESEBURGERS FROM MCD'S ON THE DOLLAR MENU.....NOT MUCH AT ALL, BREAK IT DOWN ANY WAY YOU LIKE......BUT THAT'S NOT THE POINT. THE POINT IS WHAT ARE WE GETTING FOR OUR MONEY BY APPROVING ALL THESE BOND, EMERGENCY, TEMPORARY, PERMANENT AND OPERATING LEVIES ALL THE TIME IF THE PERFORMANCE NEVER CHANGES NOR IMPROVES? HOW MANY CHANCES DO THE LEVY SATURATION PEOPLE GET? DO THE LEVY SUPPORTERS ENJOY POURING MONEY DOWN THE BLACK HOLE OF MEDIOCRITY? DO YOU ALL KEEP REWARDING THE SCHOOL PEOPLE AND NEVER SEE ANY UPWARD PROGRESS/NO ACOUNTABILTY? DO YOU ALL DO THAT WITH YOUR STOCK PORTFOLIOS OR DO YOU NOT PUT ONE MORE PENNY INTO A STOCK AND UNLOAD IT TO CUT YOUR LOSSES? THERE ARE URBAN SCHOOL DISTRICTS ACROSS THIS COUNTY THAT ARE PRODUCING BETTER RESULTS IN BUILDINGS THAT ARE JUST AS OLD AS VAIL. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH BUILDINGS. IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH CONTENT, CURRICULUM, TEACHING METHODS, HOLDING ADMIN., TEACHERS AND STUDENTS ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR LITTLE PIECE OF THE PIE. IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH CLASS STRUCTURE THROUGH DISCIPLINE AND THE ENDING OF KINDER/GENTLER BEING REPLACED BY TOUGHER EXPECTATIONS OF BEHAVIOR. JUST STOP BEING SO DAM NICE TO THE TROUBLEMAKERS AND CLAMP DOWN ON THEM. UNTIL THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT AND DEMAND CHANGE, THIS, AND OTHER URBAN DISTRICTS WILL NOT PROSPER. SCHOOL PEOPLE. AGAIN DEMONSTRATING THEY ARE IN THEIR OWN LITTLE WORLD, TOTALLY OBLIVIOUS TO THE MAINSTREAM THINKING AND TO IDENTIFYING AND ADDRESSING THE REAL ISSUES. JMO |
|
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.
|
|
![]() |
|
Richard Saunders ![]() MUSA Resident ![]() Joined: Jun 30 2010 Status: Offline Points: 232 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It is interesting to note that the last time, they were comparing the cost of the levy for a $100,000 house.
This time, it is being compared to the cost for a $75,000 house.
Sad commentary towards the property values in ye olde Middle-towne.
|
|
![]() |
|
itsamee ![]() MUSA Resident ![]() ![]() Joined: May 03 2013 Location: Middletown Status: Offline Points: 154 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think they wanted it to sound cheaper more than anything. You get it in your head that its less than $10 / month so you go and vote yes for it. I did the math on my current home (which I thought was wrong at first, but have since seen I am correct) and I am looking at around $15 / month as an increase.
Now, if we had not already bailed out the stupid senior center (about $8 a month) and helped the libraries (about $2 a month) along with being (apparently) the only property in Middletown that INCREASED in value (adding about $9 / month in tax rev) I would be all for this, but the nickel and dime increases need to end. Over the last 4 years, my house bill has gone up almost $50 a month! Add this school levy and it will be $65 / month. Middletown, you have to stop voting yes on all this stupid stuff. I usually support schools and such, but right now it is not a good time. Especially with all the financial waste that is prevalent in MCSD. I now step off my soapbox.
|
|
Itsa me, mario!
|
|
![]() |
|
Miss Kitty ![]() MUSA Immigrant ![]() ![]() Joined: Oct 29 2012 Status: Offline Points: 61 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm sure the Stained Glass business owners would LOVE to have all the wood-work and other great valuable items in the old high school. I bet they'll even take it off the schools hands for FREE!!!!! Hopefully tax payers will vote the school bond down. |
|
![]() |
|
Miss Kitty ![]() MUSA Immigrant ![]() ![]() Joined: Oct 29 2012 Status: Offline Points: 61 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I believe our school year is around 185 school days. When you calculate the majority of Middletown city school teachers wages, most of them are making well over $400 for each day they work. Are you kidding me! Let the teachers build a new middle school, hell, they can afford it.... Some teachers are making more. Spending needs to stop! Imo- please correct me if i am wrong....
|
|
![]() |
|
TonyB ![]() MUSA Citizen ![]() Joined: Jan 12 2011 Location: Middletown, OH Status: Offline Points: 631 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Miss Kitty,
You are wrong! I'll try to give you an answer to what I think you're wrong about but after reading the posts here, I doubt you'll agree; but here goes: 1. You say that teachers are making $400 a day for the days they work? Sounds good but let's look at it from another perspective. If you were to hire a babysitter or employ child day care, what would be the cost per day? Let's be conservative and say $20 per day. With 30 students per class, that would figure $600 a day. Seems like a bargain now, doesn't it. 2. Teachers are overpaid? I thought children are our future. I can't see how you'd want someone who isn't qualified to teach to be the instructors for our future. Do you have any idea how much time and money was spent by said teacher to become a teacher? Do you even care or is this a case of class and economic envy? Do you have any experience in the classroom? 3. The whole idea that spending needs to stop is a ridiculous notion. I'll use the city's funding of street repair as a prime example. They stopped spending money on it and look at the condition of the streets. Now if you're arguing for more oversight on spending; that we could agree upon. It really boils down to what kind of city you want to live in. If you want better schools, not only will they need to be paid for, you'll need better oversight of how that money is being spent. I'm not endorsing or opposing the levy because I can see both sides of the issue here, but bashing the teachers who are educating our future doesn't seem to make sense to me. You obviously have your reasons; I just don't see the reasoning behind your posts. |
|
![]() |
|
VietVet ![]() MUSA Council ![]() ![]() Joined: May 15 2008 Status: Offline Points: 7008 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
TonyB says
"It really boils down to what kind of city you want to live in. If you want better schools, not only will they need to be paid for, you'll need better oversight of how that money is being spent" THE NEW SCHOOLS HAVE ALREADY BEEN PAID FOR TONYB. 45 MILLION WORTH OF APPROVED BOND LEVY MONEY. HAVE THE SCHOOLS "GOTTEN BETTER" BECAUSE WE SPENT THE MONEY AS YOU SUGGEST? DON'T THINK SO. COMPARE THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE PRE BOND/OLDER SCHOOLS AND POST BOND APPROVAL/NEW ELEMENTARIES. THE PERFORMANCE, AFTER A FEW YEARS TO IMPROVE, HAS BEEN ABOUT THE SAME. WHAT DID WE GET FOR OUR MONEY AND WHY DID THE SCHOOL PEOPLE WANT THESE NEW SCHOOLS IF IT DIDN'T YIELD ANY BETTER RESULTS? ANSWER:THEY WANTED TO WORK IN A NICER ENVIRONMENT WITH ALL THE BELLS AND WHISTLES THAT HAVE PROVEN NOT TO MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE IN THE END. BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE LAST BOND LEVY, THE VOTERS WOULD BE FOOLS TO APPROVE ANOTHER TO BUILD THE MIDDLE SCHOOL. THE DISTRICT HASN'T MADE GOOD ON THE FIRST LEVY YET. IT ISN'T LOGICAL TO KEEP GIVING THESE PEOPLE WHAT THEY WANT WHEN THEY DON'T PRODUCE BETTER RESULTS. WHY WOULD ANYONE DO THAT? |
|
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.
|
|
![]() |
|
itsamee ![]() MUSA Resident ![]() ![]() Joined: May 03 2013 Location: Middletown Status: Offline Points: 154 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Kitty,
While there are some older teachers that are there making a decent amount, most of the newer teachers are not even coming close. I think the year 0 step is $28,000. Couple that with the fact they used to have to take a pay cut after year one, plus see a rise in benefits cost, it is not worth much to start your career at MCSD. Making that 185 day / year argument is so off. First, there are many student vacation days that teachers do not get. When students are released early, teacher are required to stay. Over the summer, some teachers have to mandatory professional development. Teachers work after hours grading papers and tests (imagine being an English teacher hand needing to grade 100 ten page reports....). Etc. In turn, most teachers have to buy their own "extras." I know a couple years ago, teachers had to purchase spare number 2 pencils in case kids did not bring them for stat tests. The cost was not reimbursed. I know, big deal, less than $10, right? But these costs happen over and over again. My opinion is, teachers should start out around $40,000 or slightly more. MCSD has many qualified teachers who get shafted on a repeated basis (sometimes by other teachers, sadly). That being said, the ones over them need pay cuts. My thought is NO ONE but the super should be making six figures. Everyone else needs to be knocked down and take the same hit teachers do. When they can get the administration costs down, I will be more likely to vote yes on levies. But come on, a first time tech director making $106,000? HR guys making over $100k? Seriously? When I was employed for various districts, I have been asked to "take one for the good of society" and get paid less. Maybe they should as well....
|
|
Itsa me, mario!
|
|
![]() |
|
wannaknow ![]() MUSA Resident ![]() ![]() Joined: Feb 21 2009 Status: Offline Points: 138 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
What does a building have to do with learning anything? If the teachers are dedicated and the students wanted to learn they could all sit in an open field. We have all these beautiful schools in Middletown and bad reports on most of them. It's what's In the building, not the building.
|
|
![]() |
|
Historic House Guy ![]() MUSA Citizen ![]() Joined: Jul 28 2013 Location: Middletown Status: Offline Points: 272 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So lets see, don't spend the money so kids can take their books home and study or do homework, but instead, build a new school... Yeah, that should work!
![]() Idiots, glad we got our kids out of that school.
|
|
![]() |
|
Marcia Andrew ![]() MUSA Citizen ![]() Joined: Jan 09 2010 Status: Offline Points: 365 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Miss Kitty, the bond issue on the ballot is to raise money to build and maintain school buildings. That money cannot be used for teacher salaries, which come out of the general fund. So, the issue you are asked to vote on this November has nothing to do with teacher salaries. However, since you brought it up -- your $400/day number is wrong. $400 x 185 days would be $74,000, and the only teachers who make that much are a small handful who have a Ph.D (doctorate) degree and 25 years or more experience teaching. The starting salary for teachers in Middletown is somewhere around $34,000 (which is at the low end of the going rate in other school districts in the region). The top pay for teachers with a Masters but not a Ph.D and 25 years experience is about $65,000. Also, while the students are in school 185 days, teachers report to work several days before school starts and stay several days later, so about 190 days. $34,000 divided by 190 is $179, less than half of what you claim. Itsamee, principals and Central Office administrators make more than teachers for a number of reasons. Principals work several more weeks each year than teachers, have advanced degrees and licensing from the state, and are responsible for supervising all of the teachers in the building. Central Office administrators work year-round, have advanced degrees and licensing, and are responsible for functions and departments district-wide. It is pretty fundamental that managers make more than front-line employees, whether it is manufacturing, sales, retail, etc. ALL employees in the Middletown Schools (including administrators) took two 1% pay reductions in the past 3 years, and at the same time their contribution to health insurance premiums doubled from 10% to 20%. Lots of school districts in the state negotiated pay freezes, but I am not aware of any others where the unions agreed to actual pay cuts. This was necessary for MIddletown to get its budget in line with reduced revenue, and it shows how dedicated our teachers and support staff are.
|
|
![]() |
|
VietVet ![]() MUSA Council ![]() ![]() Joined: May 15 2008 Status: Offline Points: 7008 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ms. Andrew:
"However, since you brought it up -- your $400/day number is wrong. $400 x 185 days would be $74,000, and the only teachers who make that much are a small handful who have a Ph.D (doctorate) degree and 25 years or more experience teaching. The starting salary for teachers in Middletown is somewhere around $34,000 (which is at the low end of the going rate in other school districts in the region). The top pay for teachers with a Masters but not a Ph.D and 25 years experience is about $65,000" Ok, let's say 65 thou for 185 days of work.... That's $351. per day, wages your average Joe would kill for and never see in their lifetime. Provides a very nice living. Most outside the academic world work more days per year than 185. Year around actually. No three month break. How many of those 185 days are taken as sick, vacation or personal days? How many holidays/off the job conferences are included in that 185 day count? Gotta take that off the total which elevates the pay per day on the job amount as each day not on the job ups the salaried money pot. Regardless of how this all breaks out, the fact is, when all people outside the academic world are working during the summer months, the teachers, admin and other school personnel are enjoying those summer trips, working in the yard or getting that sun tan while the world works away. That counts too, Ms. Andrew. I know, I have two teachers within a few houses in my neighborhood and I have seen their summer itinerary. Oh, and the starting salary for teachers in the Midd. school system is $34 thou. which, as you state, is "at the lower end of the other school districts in the region".........but, Ms. Andrew.....no one is holding a gun to their head to accept that job at that salary. Plenty of other states with numerous school districts, that may offer better opportunities to start. If they accept the job, they shouldn't complain about the pay. It's not like Middletown is the only game in town. And the pay increase out of the old paycheck for benefit premiums? The private sector has been doing this for years and is a common practice with most companies. Your education people are not enduring anything any other worker is not encountering today. |
|
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.
|
|
![]() |
|
VietVet ![]() MUSA Council ![]() ![]() Joined: May 15 2008 Status: Offline Points: 7008 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
WELL ALRIGHT!!! ANOTHER ATTEMPT TO SOFTEN YOUR HEART AND STEAL YOUR WALLET.....JOURNAL STORY-
School district’s older buildings become money pits BUTLER COUNTY — The recent cold snap that swept through Butler County tested the older school buildings in Middletown and Fairfield, some of which failed with frozen pipes and busted boilers, requiring costly repairs. School officials say the fact that those buildings buckled under the stress of record-low temperatures is just one more example of why they need to be replaced. Both Fairfield and Middletown tried and failed to pass bond issues in November to build new schools, and both are trying the ballot again in May. Officials in both districts argue that it would be cheaper and wiser for voters to approve these tax measures — a collective $120 million — than to continue to spend their tax dollars trying to patch up buildings nearly 100 years old. “Systems designed to last 50 to 60 years are now being expanded out to the 90-year mark. They are well past their life expectancy, thus making them very hard to maintain,” said George Long, business manager for Middletown City Schools. The recent cold weather brought with it a host of maintenance problems for Fairfield and Middletown schools. Pipes burst at Middletown High School, Fairfield High School and at Fairfield’s Options Academy, which forced that venue to close for a day last week, school officials said. Tom Weiser, the director of business operations for Fairfield City Schools, said insurance deductibles are $5,000 per incident, and the district’s premiums have already risen $32,000 this school year, due to a high number of claims. “I didn’t have a single problem at any of my new buildings or at the renovated elementary buildings,” Long said of the recent weather. “At the high school, though, we experienced nine pipe freezes. “We put temporary heat in four of the classrooms at the high school because the ventilators that came with the building are now so rusted that we can’t simply go in and make easy repairs,” he said. “We have to either rebuild the custom parts within those units, because we can’t get parts for them anymore, or we have to replace the whole unit.” Middletown schools is asking voters to pass a $55 million bond issue to build a new middle school and renovate the high school. It would cost the owner of a $100,000 home $147 a year in additional taxes. Meanwhile, Fairfield schools is seeking approval of a $65 million bond issue that would build three new school and cost the owner of a $100,000 an extra $91 a year in property taxes. Middletown officials say it would cost less to build a new middle school than to make repeated repairs to Vail, which was built in 1923. For example, Long said putting a new roof on Vail — an expense not yet planned — would cost $900,000. And while frozen pipes aren’t as big of a concern at Vail, the steam heat the building uses creates another set of problems. “We can’t regulate the heat,” Long said. “It’s like your grandmother’s old house with radiators in it; you were either roasting or it was cold.” Meanwhile, Fairfield officials say they would have to spend $5 million a year in maintenance costs just to keep its oldest buildings — Central Elementary, built in 1929, and the Freshman School — in usable condition. A recent sign of Central Elementary’s building wear reared its head when the boiler broke down in December while students were still in school. “That eight-inch header (that goes into both boilers) had actually rusted through. We had to have a contractor come in and cut out roughly a five-foot header and then weld in a new section of that header,” said Weiser. “That’s something that has just occurred over years and years of aging — the corrosion that takes place with steel.” The other major problem at Central has been the steam lines in the walls and under the floors. Those corrode to the point where they leak steam, Weiser said. “Once you have live steam escaping those pipes, it creates issues. We’ve had it dissolve plaster because of all the moisture. It can lead to mold,” he said. While Central is not quite as old as Vail, Fairfield has another aging building: the Fairfield Freshman School right next to Central on Dixie Highway. The 63-year-old building has its own share of problems, Weiser said, such as deteriorating brick and mortar on the exterior. “If we don’t pass the bond passed, we will have to spend $5 million just to get (Central and Freshman) in a very usable state,” Weiser said. “When we get done spending that $5 million, it doesn’t look any different. It’s going to be the same buildings. That’s not even replacing the boilers.” If Fairfield and Middletown don’t pass their latest bond issues, they will lose state funding to help pay for the cost of the new building construction, officials have said. For Middletown, the state is contributing $40 million; for Fairfield, that total is $19 million. Opponents of Fairfield and Middletown’s bond issues did not return calls seeking comment Monday. (WONDER IF THEY EVEN ASKED ANYONE WHO IS OPPOSED?) I DIRECT YOUR ATTENTION TO THE 6 COMMENTS AT THE END OF THE ARTICLE. KINDA SAYS IT ALL. I DO KNOW THAT DUKE, YALE, HARVARD AND PRINCETON UNIVERSITES, ALONG WITH THE NAVAL ACADEMY AND WEST POINT, ARE ALL CONSIDERING TEARING DOWN THEIR BUILDINGS BECAUSE THEY ARE OLDER THAN 50 OR 60 YEARS OLD. LOOKS LIKE THE MIDD./FAIRFIELD SCHOOLS FAILED TO DEVELOP A PLAN ON A PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM ALL THIS TIME, RELYING ON THE TAXPAYER TO REPLACE THEIR BUILDINGS ONCE THEY START COSTING MONEY TO MAINTAIN. ![]() ![]() |
|
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2345> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.086 seconds.
Copyright ©2024 MiddletownUSA.com | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Site by Xponex Media | Advertising Information |