Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Vivian Moon
MUSA Council
Joined: May 16 2008
Location: Middletown, Ohi
Status: Offline
Points: 4187
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 21 2014 at 2:23pm |
Here is where Mr. Adkins did the 54% rule
and declared all of Middletown “Slumville
USA”.
Oh yes I remember it well.
Middletown Journal
Updated: 12:53 a.m. Monday, Oct. 5, 2009 | Posted: 7:46 p.m. Sunday, Oct. 4, 2009
Housing, development funds at stake at Council meeting
By
Ed Richter
Staff
Writer
After a hiatus of nearly a month,
Middletown City Council reconvene Tuesday, Oct. 6, to begin 2010 budget
discussions, among many other items on its agenda.
In addition to its budget discussions,
council will consider an ordinance for a substantial amendment to the 2009
Community Development Block Grant annual action plan and the 2005-2010 Consolidated
Plan that will be sent to the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
According to a report from Doug Adkins,
community revitalization director, the amendment is needed to clean up various
program requirements since the passage of the 2009 action plan.
The changes include
expanding the target area based on HUD data that 54 percent of Middletown’s households city-wide qualify as low- to moderate-income
areas. The plan has areas in the 1st, 2nd and 4th wards that qualify for CDBG
funding.
Other changes are housekeeping to adjust
funding for different activities due to the city receiving federal Neighborhood
Stabilization Program funding.
One of the changes would be moving CDBG
funding for demolition for other projects as the city is receiving NSP funding
for demolition of blighted structures.
Adkins’ report said expanding the area
city-wide would enable the use of CDBG funding to assist homeowners to assist
with property maintenance issues.
The city annually receives about $685,000
in CDBG funding.
Middletown City Council will meet at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers on the lower level of
the Middletown City Building, One Donham Plaza.
|
|
Vivian Moon
MUSA Council
Joined: May 16 2008
Location: Middletown, Ohi
Status: Offline
Points: 4187
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 30 2014 at 2:10pm |
Middletown Journal
Posted: 4:24 p.m. Monday, Dec. 10, 2012
City targets five eyesores for demolition
By Michael D. Pitman
Staff Writer
MIDDLETOWN — Middletown officials are
considering tearing down pieces of downtown’s history in order to build toward
the city’s future.
Years
ago, the former Sonshine, Studio Theater, Middletown Cabinet and Montgomery
Ward buildings were some of the most highly-used and recognizable buildings in
Middletown. Today, they are among the worst eyesores.
That’s why city officials are talking about
spending between $1 million and $1.5 million to demolish those city-owned
structures in the second phase of a two-part demolitions plan. The first phase of the city’s plan involves
razing the Orman building at 500 Tytus Ave., which carries a price
tag of $597,000.
“With severely blighted structures
eliminated from the landscape, and fresh green space, parking lots or new
buildings in their place — along with students from Cincinnati State and the
draw from art establishments and restaurants — I believe our downtown will have
a very lively and vital feel in five years,” said City Manager Judy Gilleland.
The Orman building, which is expected to be
torn down in late January or early February, is the only building on the city’s
list guaranteed to see the wrecking ball right now. Last week, City Council
approved a deal with Cincinnati-based O’Rourke Wrecking to take down the Orman
building. The city has already invested $75,000 in the Orman building’s
deconstruction after it began to collapse and crumble this summer.
The falling debris covered a portion of the
railroad tracks used by rail suppliers of Wausau Paper several hundred feet
away. Vickers Wrecking was paid to tear down a portion of the north wing of the
building and stabilize it until city officials could seek demolition proposals.
Jay
Moorman, a downtown Middletown business owner, said he
believes the city should try to sell the buildings before demolishing them. He
said the city could offer a deal similar to the one he and his wife, Linda
Moorman, got a decade ago — sell the building for $100, give a no-interest loan
in the amount it would cost to raze the building and the buyer will match the
loan in building improvements.
For the $300,000 no-interest loan they
received, the Moormans have invested $600,000 into transforming the old
three-story G.C. Murphy Building — which at one time was
targeted for demolition by the city — into BeauVerre at the Square.
“That made perfect sense to me,” said Jay
Moorman. “No matter what happened, they had to come up with the $300,000. This
way, they get their money back and they got more than a parking lot.”
While Moorman understands “it’s obvious
that some of these (buildings) are beyond help,” he thinks city officials
should consider it before sinking money in tearing down a building.
Gilleland
said as the city does look toward its future, and where it can grow,
demolishing old buildings that are condemned and vacant of squatters is an
option that Gilleland said is worth the investment.
“In an older industrial city that is very
much landlocked, our opportunity and space for redevelopment is limited,” she
said. “When we identify a legitimate demolition project, we’re pretty pleased.”
If these four buildings are razed, the city
would need to borrow between $1 million and $1.5 million, though the Sonshine
building may not be on a demolition list as staff is “still debating” the fate
of that structure.
“Cost is certainly a consideration,”
Gilleland said, noting demolishing the Sonshine building would be around
$250,000. “The area would be great parking in a future phase for demolition and
renovation.”
One building that won’t be on the list is
the former Manchester Inn & Conference Center, which closed in 2011.
Gilleland said they’ll put the historic hotel on the market, though she didn’t
say for how much.
Middletown Board of Realtors President Reva
Owens supports the efforts to get rid of those vacant buildings.
“They’re kind of trashy,” Owens said. “If
the town looks better, the more prospects will come to town — more businesses.”
If these buildings would leave the skyline,
Owens isn’t sure what could become of the property, but has faith in the city’s
planners.
“There are some really good people down at
the city who have some good insight,” she said.
|
|
Vivian Moon
MUSA Council
Joined: May 16 2008
Location: Middletown, Ohi
Status: Offline
Points: 4187
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 30 2014 at 2:30pm |
Middletown Journal
Posted: 5:00 p.m. Monday, Aug. 13, 2012
Second city-owned building found crumbling
By Michael D. Pitman
Staff Writer
MIDDLETOWN — A second city-owned vacant downtown building in as many
months has partially crumbled due to apparent deterioration.
Last week, the Manchester Inn’s Sonshine
building, 101 N. Main St., had bricks fall from
its facade onto the sidewalk. Access near the building on North Main Street and Manchester Avenue has been blocked by an
orange plastic safety fence.
“The structure of the building is fine,
just the brick facade has come loose,” said Doug Adkins, Middletown community
revitalization director.
However, the future stability of the
building is in question, he said.
“The condition of the metal lintels and
mortar joints makes it impossible to know the stability of the remaining
facade,” Adkins said.
Contractors removed loose brick from the
building’s facade this past weekend. However,
he said metal lintels — load-bearing building components — above the windows on
building’s second floor are deteriorating and rusty, and mortar joints were
inspected and also found to be deteriorating.
The sidewalk next to the building has been
blocked from pedestrian access because “high winds or other conditions may
trigger further collapse of the weakened facade presenting a hazard to anyone
occupying the area below,” Adkins said.
Last week the city hired Vickers Wrecking
to stabilize the partially collapsed wall and roof of the Orman building, 500 N. Verity Parkway. City officials were
notified on July 27 of the partial roof collapse at the northwest wing of the
city-owned building. Debris fell from the side of the building — which the
walls are protruding — onto the adjacent railroad track.
The roof is apparently pushing on the
building’s exterior walls, Adkins told city council last week.
Issues with the Orman building are forcing
the city to raze the building sooner than anticipated, and could cost between
$500,000 to $1 million, said City Manager Judy Gilleland. She said this would
“wipe out” one of the city’s last remaining downtown project funds, but city
staff is looking for grants to help offset some of the cost.
The fate of the Sonshine building, and how
much that fate will cost the city, is being discussed, Adkins said.
“We are still looking at what the options are,
possible risk and benefit of each option and then gathering costs and source of
funding,” he said.
The
city will likely address the Orman building’s issues before rendering a
decision on the Sonshine building.
Bid packets are being prepared to be sent
out to potential companies that would be interested in razing the Orman
building. Packets had been sent out, but Adkins said they were pulled and
reconfigured to reflect the stabilization work to be done this week. A date to
open the bids has not yet been set.
|
|
Vivian Moon
MUSA Council
Joined: May 16 2008
Location: Middletown, Ohi
Status: Offline
Points: 4187
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 30 2014 at 2:44pm |
Middletown Journal
Posted: 4:39 p.m. Thursday, March 14, 2013
MIDDLETOWN
REVITALIZATION
Possibilities open up for downtown Middletown without the Orman
building
By Michael D. Pitman
Staff Writer
MIDDLETOWN — A changed landscape means new possiblities for downtown
redevelopment now that one of Middletown’s most well-known eyesores is being
torn down, city officials and local businesses say.
The Orman building at 500 Tytus Avenue
showed signs of its age and neglect when it began crumbling this past summer.
Fallen debris from the structure blocked the railroad tracks that run north of
the property, and city officials rushed to stabilize the building before more
chunks of brick fell, possibly striking something or someone.
The city paid
Middletown-based Vickers Wrecking, Inc. $75,000 to stabilize the building,
which involved tearing down its crumbling northern wall. And in December, City
Council agreed to pay O’Rourke’s Wrecking, a Cincinnati-based company that also
tore down the old Middletown Regional Hospital, $597,000 to finish the job.
When the site is finally cleared, and the
empty land is seeded with grass, it will be “less of an eyesore, and the
possibilities are endless,” said Dan McClain, store manager of Jeff Pohlman
Tire and Auto Service on Verity Parkway, which sits about a
block from the Orman building.
He
likened the possibilities to when the 12th District Court of Appeals building —
also about a block away from the auto business — was built several years ago.
The courthouse replaced a few old buildings off Reinartz Boulevard, and McClain said that
“lightened up and brightened the downtown.”
“Once you have an area clear, you can put
something back up and make it more prominent,” he said. “Anything that they can
do for the downtown is better for the downtown.”
O’Rourke started several weeks ago removing
the asbestos inside the building. This week, crews from O’Rourke started
tearing down the abandoned industrial building. On the first day of demolition,
the center portion of the u-shaped building was gone.
Jeff Sizemore with O’Rourke Wrecking said
the debris that remained from the August partial demolition still needs to be
inspected for asbestos, and any contaminated material would be taken to
Rumpke’s dump. It will take a few months to complete the demolition and clear
the site, he said.
The business owners and managers in the
block where the Orman building sits say it will definitely be a new look
without it as part of the landscape.
“It will be a hollow hole, an empty space.
It will take a little while to get used to it not being there,” said Ron Cole,
owner of CRC Automotive. “I hate to see old stuff go, but it’s time for it to
come down.”
Driving up on the site post-deconstruction
would probably be like when people first drove past where the downtown garage
stood after its demolition, said City Manager Judy Gilleland.
“It will look very fresh and open instead
of old and dilapidated,” she said.
What will happen with the site after the
building is down and the site is cleared is not yet known.
“Sometimes projects like this they are so
voluminous we need to work on the first phase and then determine the next
phase,” Gilleland said.
Marketing the parcel is a possibility. It’s
in the Urban Core Support zone, which means uses like office, residential and
entertainment would be permitted. Retail and restaurant uses are not permitted
without the city planning commission’s approval.
Leaving it as green space could “work well”
as an extension to Smith Park, Gilleland said.
“As long as a historic building is not
involved, I love to see new green space spouting all over town,” she said.
The site could be an opportunity for
additional downtown living, which is part of the city’s downtown plan.
But some of the business owners would like
to see the space be productive.
“I’d say put some kind of business in
there,” said Ray Fields, owner of Ray’s Muffler and Brakes. “They need to draw
some business back downtown and stuff. Anything would be an improvement over
what it’s been in the last two years.”
|
|
acclaro
Prominent MUSA Citizen
Joined: Jul 01 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1878
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 30 2014 at 2:49pm |
Tragically, te city economic development team is wrapped up in finding federal grant funding, than efforts to develop new business desperately needed. Middletown just one major break, a nice, large manufacturing company, or a logistics firm, pharma, et al. What is missing about Middletown's decline and reasoning, is the union busting moved many companies outside the mid-west. If it were not for the capital expendituires and proximity to Detroit, which now is mostly being built in China, with exception of Honda, Toyota and Ford, AKS would consider relocating. AKS also caters to Whirlpool and several Michigan based manufacturers needing its products. Downsizing was part of the trend in manufacturing, union issues and avoidance was the other.
|
'An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.' - Winston Churchill
|
|
Vivian Moon
MUSA Council
Joined: May 16 2008
Location: Middletown, Ohi
Status: Offline
Points: 4187
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 30 2014 at 2:55pm |
Middletown Journal
Posted: 12:00 a.m. Saturday, Sept. 8, 2012
Neglected properties a drain on community and
budget
By
Rick McCrabb
Staff Writer
Falling property values in the city can be
traced to the supply-demand imbalance in Middletown and the large number
of vacant and dilapidated properties, housing experts say.
City
officials want to put a stop to this. Last year, the Middletown Journal
examined five properties that readers said were among the worst eyesores in the
area. In a year’s time, four of them have been demolished or are scheduled to
be leveled, the Journal has learned.
Such
eyesores can be hazardous to the health of residents and a burden on government
budgets.
Doug Adkins, Middletown’s director of
revitalization, said his department demolishes between 40 to 50 structures a
year, a number that will increase significantly in 2013. The city received a
$2.4 million Moving Ohio Forward grant, and Adkins said the plan is to use the
money to demolish the “worse” 300 eyesores in the city, those homes and
businesses considered in most disrepair.
There are 23,296 housing units in the city,
and 20,238 are occupied, giving the city a 13.1-percent vacancy rate, according
to the most recent U.S. Census. The more properties that are demolished, the
greater the need for quality housing, Adkins said.
Properties demolished
A home on Yankee Road was leveled a few
days after the stories appeared on Sept.
10, 2011 in the Journal, and the Orman Building, 500 N. Verity
Parkway, a vacant home on Forrer Street in Lemon Twp. and the
former Wayne Elementary School, are being demolished,
city and township officials said.
The Journal asked readers to nominate the
biggest eyesores in the area, and the list was narrowed to the Top 5: former First Baptist Church, 119 S. Main St.; vacant home at 411 Yankee Road; former Wayne Elementary School, 5566 Jacksonburg
Road, Trenton; Orman Building and a log cabin at 1101 Forrer St.
The land where the home at 411 Yankee Road formerly sat is
covered with grass today after the home was demolished last September with
Neighborhood Stabilization Funds.
Last year, the front door was pad-locked,
and most of the roof was removed and a pile of wood rested against a
chain-linked fence. The property faces Old South Park, which recently
received playground equipment as part of the facelift to the Historic District
on South Main Street.
The house was vandalized in 2008 when
thieves stole copper and that same year, police were called several times for
vagrants living there.
One neighbor, who wanted to remain
anonymous, said “it’s about time” the home was demolished, and she said the
vacant house at 405 Yankee Road, just three doors away, also is a nuisance and
it needs to be leveled. That home is covered with high weeds, making it nearly
impossible to see from the road.
Another property that’s seeing improvement
is the former Orman Building on North Verity Parkway. Last year at this
time, Adkins said the city was looking at “creative partnerships” to clean up
and renovate the building.
But in July, when part of the roof
collapsed, bricks spilled onto the nearby railroad tracks, cutting off
materials to Wausau Paper Co., the city had to move quicker than anticipated. Vickers Wrecking was hired to stabilize the
collapsed wall and roof, at a cost of $75,000 to the city. City Manager Judy
Gilleland said a rough estimate on demolition is between $500,000 to $1
million.
Adkins said the city hopes to have the bids
for the demolition finalized next month.
The
property at 1101 Forrer St. appears in better
shape, though some neighbors still consider the property an eye sore. Last
year, the yard was littered with two trucks, stacks of tires that were a haven
for mosquitoes and 10-foot weeds. Since then, most of the front of the home has
been removed, making it possible to look through the front door. The cars and
tires have been removed and the grass has been mowed.
The land is owned by Christopher Todd, who
was unavailable for comment.
It
appears a large eye sore in Wayne Twp. is about to be demolished, sold, then
built into a residence, said Ted Ritter, zoning inspector for Wayne Twp.
Ritter said he hates when a historical
building is leveled, but the cost of renovating the nearly 100-year-old
property was too expensive. He said it would have cost about $1 million to
upgrade the building, which, he said, wasn’t feasible.
So Charles Flaig, the owner, is having the
asbestos removed, then selling the property to Gordon Friend, who plans to
build a home on the nearly four-acre property, Ritter said. Flaig was
unavailable for comment. Ritter said the title can’t be transferred until the
property is demolished, hopefully by the end of January 2013.
Ritter called the residential conversion
“the best bet” for the township.
Friend,
who owns other property in the county and a Cricket store in Trenton, said he’s unsure
what to do with the property after it’s demolished.
Since the previous owner wouldn’t comply
with court orders, Friend said the property “fell in my lap.”
The end appears near for the former First Baptist Church on South Main Street in the middle of the
city’s historical district. Over the last years, the church was supposed to be
converted into a youth training center, an art gallery, a museum or another
business.
But Adkins said the property is in the
process of forfeit to the state of Ohio. He expects the
church to be demolished sometime next year. The land is valued at $17,640 and
the building has no value, according to the Butler County Auditor’s office.
Unmatched
coverage
Following
up with the investigation
Last
year, The Middletown Journal asked readers to tell us where the worst eyesores
were located in the Middletown area. After narrowing
down the entries, the Journal analyzed property records, interviewed city and
health officials, neighbors and attempted several times to contact the owners
of the properties.
This
year, we returned to those properties and repeated our investigation.
Facts
and figures
Address:
411 Yankee Road
Owner:
Innovative Research LLC (Utah)
Date
built: 1900
Occupancy:
Demolished
Taxes
owed: $0
Value:
$8,910
Address:
1101 Forrer St., Lemon Twp.
Owner:
Christopher Todd
Date
built: 1940
Occupancy:
Vacant
Taxes
owed: $0
Value:
$40,040
Address:
119 S. Main St.
Owner:
119SMAIN LLC (Cincinnati)
Date
built: 1908
Occupancy:
Vacant
Taxes
owed: $4,232.93
Value:
$17,640
Address:
500 N. Verity Parkway
Owner:
City of Middletown
Date
built: Unknown
Occupancy:
Vacant
Taxes
owed: $0
Value:
$19,760
Address:
5566 Jacksonburg Road, Trenton
Owner:
Charles Flaig
Date
built: 1914
Occupancy:
Vacant
Taxes
owed: $1,497.74
Value:
$62,240
SOURCE:
Butler County Auditor’s Office
Butler County
148,273:
Total housing units
135,960:
Occupied
94,757:
Owner-occupied
41,203:
Renter-occupied
12,313:
Vacant
|
|
Vivian Moon
MUSA Council
Joined: May 16 2008
Location: Middletown, Ohi
Status: Offline
Points: 4187
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 30 2014 at 3:03pm |
Middletown Journal
Updated: 2:35 p.m. Saturday, Jan. 12, 2013 | Posted: 12:00
a.m. Saturday,
Jan. 12, 2013
Impound lot adds thousands of dollars to Middletown’s coffers
By
Rick McCrabb
MIDDLETOWN — More than a quarter of a million dollars
has been added to Middletown’s coffers in less than
two years, largely due to funds generated by the city’s impound lot.
Since
April 2011, the Middletown Division of Police has impounded more than 1,700
vehicles for traffic violations, and their fines have added $252,546 to the
city’s general fund, said Russ Carolus, finance director.
Most of that money is earmarked for the
police and fire departments, he said. The city’s operating budget is $29.7
million, and 72 percent of that, or about $21 million, is the combined budgets
for the police and fire departments. Carolus, who retired last week after a
30-year career, said cities are always — especially with the state’s budget
cuts — looking for ways to increase revenue without adding significant man
hours.
“The more money, the better,” he said,
adding the implementation of the impound lot was a “pretty good idea.”
When a motorist in Middletown is cited for
a traffic offense — driving while intoxicated, driving under suspension — and
their vehicle is towed, it’s taken to the impound lot, the former Orman
Building on Broad Street, across the street from the City Building. The
administrative fee is $175, and the cost increases $20 for each additional day the vehicle is
stored after the first day, said Sgt. David Birk, who oversees the impound lot.
In April 2011, the city contracted with
Mark’s Towing, which submitted the lowest bid, to handle its impounded
vehicles. Mark’s Towing is reimbursed once a month at $50 per vehicle, meaning
the city nets at least $125 per vehicle, more if the owner doesn’t claim the
vehicle the next day, Birk said.
Last year, the city towed about three cars
a day, according to statistics from the police department. Birk said from April
2011 to the end of the year, 638 vehicles were towed. In 2012, the city’s first
full year of operating the lot, 1,080 vehicles were towed, he said. These
numbers represent only impounded vehicles, not those towed because they were
involved in accidents, Birk said.
Before starting the program, the numerous
tow companies in Middletown rotated removing cars
to their impound lots, and they handled the administrative duties that included
collection of fines and fees.
Middletown, Trenton and Oxford are the three local
communities that manage their impound lots, according to the police
departments.
Trenton opened its impound lot
in 2005, said Lt. Mike Gillen, who followed policies similar to Oxford’s. He said there are
two tow companies in Trenton, and they rotate towing
the cars. The companies bill the city a flat fee of $100 per car, and the city
charges the motorists an additional administrative fee of $100, and $15 per day
after the first 24 hours, Gillen said. He said in 2011, the latest figures
available, Trenton impounded 308 vehicles,
about 50 higher than average. Of those, 273 were retrieved, 27 were scrapped
and eight were sold at auction.
All of the other surrounding communities
don’t operate impound lots. Instead, the local tow companies rotate picking up
the vehicles, and they handle all the paperwork.
Representatives from the local agencies
said they were surprised by the number of vehicles being towed in Middletown and the revenue the
program generates. They’re considering adopting a similar program, they said.
Birk said the vehicles are stored in a
fenced lot near the former Orman Building. There is a
motion-activated spotlight nearby, he said. One day last week, there were 25
vehicles and two motorcycles stored in the lot.
Once vehicles are impounded, the registered
owners are contacted by the police department, and Birk gives them at least 30
days to retrieve their vehicles. If they don’t pick up their vehicles, the city
obtains a salvage title, and the vehicle is sold on an online auction.
Owners are permitted to pick up their
vehicles from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. — except from noon to 1 p.m. — in the Middletown detective section. All
payment must be cash, said Birk, who added that policy was instituted after the
department received too many checks with insufficient funds.
Birk
said the department does accept checks from rental companies that have had one
of their vehicles impounded.
Some owners, who believe their vehicles
aren’t worth the cost of the tow and storage fees, never claim them, Birk said.
Those vehicles eventually, after their titles clear, are sold on an online
auction, www.govdeals.org. The vehicle’s original owner sometimes buy their car
back during the auction, Birk said.
Eventually, probably in the spring, the
city will expand its impound program to include “junk motor vehicles” that are
parked on the street, Birk said. Once the Orman Building is demolished, the
city’s impound lot will move to Terry Drive, which offers about
twice the space, he said.
|
|
Vivian Moon
MUSA Council
Joined: May 16 2008
Location: Middletown, Ohi
Status: Offline
Points: 4187
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jun 06 2014 at 12:19pm |
In order to evaluate the
true cost of the Restoration of the Downtown Core
I believe we need to go back to when the roof of the Downtown Mall was removed
15 years ago.
Agenda September 21, 1999
Page 2
6. CITY COMMISSION COMMENTS
III. LEGISLATION
1. Ordinance No. 099-99, an ordinance
establishing a procedure for and authorizing a contract with Federal Signal
Corporation for the purchase and installation of an outdoor warning system, 2nd reading.
2. Ordinance No. 099-100, an ordinance
authorizing an agreement with Crystal Tissue for sewer connection, and to declare an
emergency.
3. Resolution No. R99-24, a resolution in
support of the D.A.R.E. Program and authorizing the City Manager to apply for a grant for
the 1999-2000 school year through the Ohio Attorney General’s Office and
declaring an emergency.
4. Ord/Res, Block Grant Advisory Board.
5. Fiscal Officer’s Certificate. In connection
with proposed issue of $10,590,000 bonds to pay costs of the reestablishment of
a substantial part or all of Central Avenue and Broad Streets, for acquisition
of property, for demolition and removal of a substantial part or all of the
City Centre Mall, renovation thereof and all costs necessary or incidental
thereto; that the estimated life or period of usefulness of the improvement is
at least five years, and the estimated maximum maturity ofthe Bonds, calculated
in accordance with Section 133.20 of the Revised Code, is thirty (30) years.
6. Ordinance No. , an ordinance providing for
the issuance and sale of not to exceed $10,590,000 bonds for the purpose of paying
costs of the construction of street improvements and the necessary demolition,
property acquisition and other activities related thereto implementing the
Downtown Urban Renewal Plan, as amended from time to time, and declaring an
emergency.
7. Fiscal Officer’s Certificate. In connection
with proposed issuance of not to exceed $2,560,000 bonds for the municipal waterworks
improvement by constructing an elevated water storage tank; that the
estimated life or period of usefulness of the improvement is at least five years;
and the estimated maximum maturity of the Bonds, calculated in accordance with
Section 133.20 of the Revised Code, is forty (40) years.
8. Ordinance No. , an ordinance providing for
the issuance and sale of not to exceed $2,560,000 bonds, for the purpose of paying
the costs of improving the municipal waterworks system by constructing an
elevated water storage tank and water mains, together with the necessary
appurtenances thereto, and declaring an emergency.
9. Resolution No. R99-25, a resolution to make
adjustments to appropriations for current expenses and other expenditures of
the City of Middletown, Counties of Butler and Warren, State of Ohio, for the
period ending December 31, 1999, and to declare an emergency. (Downtown
Improvements Fund)
10. Resolution No. R99-26, a resolution
accepting the amounts and rates as determined by the Budget Commission and authorizing
the necessary tax levies and certifying them to the County Auditor, and to declare an emergency.
11. Ordinance No. 099-100, an ordinance a
contract with Mid-Valley Care Net for employee health coverage, and to declare
an emergency.
12. Ordinance No. 099- , an ordinance
authorizing a contract modification with Dodson-Stilson for engineering work on Cincinnati-Dayton Road and declaring an emergency.
13. Ordinance No. 099- , an ordinance
authorizing a contract with Dodson Stillson for design work, and declaring an
emergency.
14. Ordinance No. 099- , an ordinance
authorizing a contract with URS Greiner Woodward Clyde for USEPA RIP, and to declare an
emergency.
15. Ordinance No. 099- , an ordinance
authorizing a contract with URS Greiner
Woodward Clyde for CSO studies, and to declare an
emergency.
16. Resolution No. R99- , a resolution
authorizing the submission of an application for infrastructure improvements to
the Ohio Public Works Commission; the execution of a contract therewith; and
declaring an emergency.
17. Ordinance No. 099- , an ordinance
authorizing the City to pay it’s share of the Manchester Manor 17
infrastructure improvements, and declaring an emergency.
18. Ordinance No. 099- , authorizing a
contract extension with Burch Hydro, Inc. for sludge disposal, and declaring an
emergency.
19. Ordinance No. 099- , an ordinance
authorizing a contract with Middletown Ford for the purchase of eight police
cruisers, and to declare an emergency.
20. Ordinance No. 099- , to expand the City’s
Urban Enterprise Zone, and to declare an emergency.
21. Ordinance No. 099- , an ordinance
modifying certain licensing requirements for mechanical contractors, and
declaring an emergency.
22. Ordinance No. 099- , authorizing the
application for the 2000 Ohio Elderly and Disabled Transit Fare Assistance
Grant, and declaring an emergency.
It is the policy of the City of Middletown to make all public hearings and
meetings accessible to all persons, in accordance with state and/or federal
laws. If you have a disability which requires accommodation in order for you to
attend and/or participate in this meeting, please contact us at 425-7934 or
425-7705 (TDD) at least forty-eight hours prior to the time of the meeting to
advise us of the need for accommodation, and reasonable efforts shall be made
to provide the same.
|
|
Vivian Moon
MUSA Council
Joined: May 16 2008
Location: Middletown, Ohi
Status: Offline
Points: 4187
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Aug 02 2014 at 8:37am |
Five years ago City Hall presented the public with their new vision of the MASTER PLAN...
City explores concepts to change look of downtown
By Ed Richter, Staff Writer 10:05 PM Friday, July 31, 2009
MIDDLETOWN - Downtown could have a different look in the coming years if one of two concepts being developed by a consultant is eventually approved by Middletown City Council.
The proposed changes could include an expanded Smith Park, realigning several downtown streets, adding more streetscaping of key traffic arteries, demolishing some buildings and landbanking the properties for future development, demolishing the city-owned parking garage, developing gateways to the downtown core and identifying new uses for several buildings.
Earlier this year, City Manager Judy Gilleland made the citys Economic Development Department take charge of developing a strategic development plan for the downtown. City Council approved a consulting study to be completed by Woolpert Inc.
Since then, Woolpert has been meeting with the stakeholders and other property owners in developing the new downtown strategic plan, which will be presented to City Council on Aug. 18.
Mike Robinette, the citys economic development director, said the proposed plan is very viable.
The whole strategy is to implement the plan within a five-year window, he said. is a short term, action-oriented kind of plan which is exactly what we wanted.
Robinette said the plan shrinks commercial space downtown to build stability and sustainability, then builds out from there.
The study also identified downtown development intervention strategies that would transition, maintain, redevelop or be proactively preserving sections of the downtown area bounded by Second, Girard, First and Columbia avenues, University Boulevard, Casper, Clark, and Main streets, and Carmody Boulevard.
Both concepts are similar, but one also addresses the possibility of establishing a downtown train station off Charles Street on the east boundary of the downtown district. The train station is part of other discussions with the state that is exploring a statewide passenger rail service.
The concepts explore existing conditions such as current land use, civic assets and traffic circulation. It also explores key goals such as:
Consolidation through concentrating on entertainment, arts and retail in the downtown core. The plan seeks to encourage business relocation to the downtown core by filling vacant space; preserving building fabric and infilling the remaining gaps; strengthening the gateways; concentrating programming; and enhancing façade and storefront design. It also looks at transitioning areas east of Clinton Street to residential/office/institutional uses by preserving and rehabilitating buildings with reuse potential, demolishing and landbanking other buildings, and encouraging compatible infill.
Increased residential presence through creating attractive downtown neighborhoods along the riverfront, artist/resident space in the upper floors of downtown buildings, expanding the Trinity Place neighborhood and looking at rehabilitating the former Orman Building. It will also look at improving existing neighborhoods adjacent to downtown by demolishing/landbanking foreclosed homes, buffering or relocating heavy commercial uses, and reinforcing the South Main Historic District.
Making the downtown walkable and functioning by right-sizing streets. This could be down by converting some one way streets such as Verity Parkway and Clinton Streets back to two-way streets; reducing unnecessary lanes; extending the Central Avenue streetscaping to calm traffic. The study looks at realigning some streets to eliminate jogs and awkward intersections and eliminating unnecessary street segments. Two possible street eliminations could be Main streets between Reinartz Boulevard and Verity Parkway and Broad Street between Reinartz and Main.
Connecting assets by integrating institutional anchors with downtown. This explores relocating one or more anchor uses closer to downtown such as reusing the former Swallens building as a business incubator and partnering with Miami University to promote and manage the facility.
Another possibility would be to create a premiere downtown park system with interconnected paths and greenways. A possible greenway could be along Central Avenue to connect Bicentennial Commons with the bike path, extend the park system into the streets, converting the Dublin House front yard into a neighborhood park. This could also include expanding Smith Park into the Main/Reinartz/Verity triangle if those sections of Main and Broad streets are vacated. In addition, this could include improving pedestrian connections to Smith Park and extend the bike lane along Clinton to connect with Verity Parkways bike path.
Making the downtown more welcoming through stronger gateways at University Boulevard and Central Avenue. Other aspects include linking with the Interstate 75 gateway theme and Central Avenue streetscape; establishing north and south gateways and demolishing/landbanking the vacant properties; coordinating a western gateway with the Central Avenue gateway; exploring a complete or partial demolition of the city-owned parking garage; locating all parking lots to the rear of buildings; and creating mid-block cut-throughs with lighting, landscaping and street furniture.
The only difference in both concepts are the addition of Middletown Station and using it to leverage the passenger rail station as a catalyst for downtown revitalization by restoring the historic train depot and making the area a transit-oriented development on adjacent blocks. It would also look at improving the surrounding street grid to accommodate increased rail and auto traffic and support redevelopment. In addition, it could mean vacating Charles Street between Central and Manchester avenues.
|
|
over the hill
MUSA Citizen
Joined: Oct 19 2012
Location: middletown
Status: Offline
Points: 952
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Aug 02 2014 at 9:59am |
Well that plan must have hit the garbage can as soon as Woolpert Inc. walked out the door because we have nothing even remotely similar to those plans and probably never will.
|
|
over the hill
MUSA Citizen
Joined: Oct 19 2012
Location: middletown
Status: Offline
Points: 952
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Aug 02 2014 at 10:03am |
Would love to hear from anyone still around about what happened to those plans. What was council's thoughts on the plan? Anyone?
|
|
Vivian Moon
MUSA Council
Joined: May 16 2008
Location: Middletown, Ohi
Status: Offline
Points: 4187
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Aug 02 2014 at 12:23pm |
Increased residential presence through creating attractive downtown neighborhoods along the riverfront, artist/resident space in the upper floors of downtown buildings, expanding the Trinity Place neighborhood and looking at rehabilitating the former Orman Building. It will also look at improving existing neighborhoods adjacent to downtown by demolishing/landbanking foreclosed homes, buffering or relocating heavy commercial uses, and reinforcing the South Main Historic District
Riverfront- City Hall did expand the Bike Path along the river paid for by grant money.
Trinity Place- City Hall purchased the Mission Church on Central Ave for about $125,000 and then tore it down. They demoed Barb's Pub on Central and then purchased Mid-Town Cabinets on Vail for about $95,000. Then they stopped work on this area.
Orman Building- Was demoed for $600,000 by using funds from the Well Head Protection Fund
South Main Street- Got their new street lights and their street got paved
|
|
Vivian Moon
MUSA Council
Joined: May 16 2008
Location: Middletown, Ohi
Status: Offline
Points: 4187
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Aug 02 2014 at 12:31pm |
The proposed changes could include an expanded Smith Park, realigning several downtown streets, adding more streetscaping of key traffic arteries, demolishing some buildings and landbanking the properties for future development, demolishing the city-owned parking garage, developing gateways to the downtown core and identifying new uses for several buildings.
Swallen's and the Parking Garage- Demo of both the Swallen's building and the Parking Garage for 1.2 million paid for by bond.
|
|
Vivian Moon
MUSA Council
Joined: May 16 2008
Location: Middletown, Ohi
Status: Offline
Points: 4187
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Aug 02 2014 at 12:45pm |
Both concepts are similar, but one also addresses the possibility of establishing a downtown train station off Charles Street on the east boundary of the downtown district. The train station is part of other discussions with the state that is exploring a statewide passenger rail service.
The only difference in both concepts are the addition of Middletown Station and using it to leverage the passenger rail station as a catalyst for downtown revitalization by restoring the historic train depot and making the area a transit-oriented development on adjacent blocks. It would also look at improving the surrounding street grid to accommodate increased rail and auto traffic and support redevelopment. In addition, it could mean vacating Charles Street between Central and Manchester avenues.
Train Station - Also known as the great Duncan Oil Land Swap. With the cost of the demo for the small strip center and the demo and Office Suppy building...I believe we lost money on this deal...and Duncan Oil did not build the Gas Mart on their new property and City Hall has not required that Duncan Oil clean up and grass this area...it is not a welcom site as you enter "The Downtown"
|
|
Vivian Moon
MUSA Council
Joined: May 16 2008
Location: Middletown, Ohi
Status: Offline
Points: 4187
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Aug 02 2014 at 12:53pm |
Consolidation through concentrating on entertainment, arts and retail in the downtown core. The plan seeks to encourage business relocation to the downtown core by filling vacant space; preserving building fabric and infilling the remaining gaps; strengthening the gateways; concentrating programming; and enhancing façade and storefront design. It also looks at transitioning areas east of Clinton Street to residential/office/institutional uses by preserving and rehabilitating buildings with reuse potential, demolishing and landbanking other buildings, and encouraging compatible infill.
Connecting assets by integrating institutional anchors with downtown. This explores relocating one or more anchor uses closer to downtown such as reusing the former Swallens building as a business incubator and partnering with Miami University to promote and manage the facility.
Increase Businesses Downtown - I guess this would be the purchase of the Thatcher Buildings for about $600,000 and Cincinnati State Campus coming to the downtown area. Pendelton Art also moved to the downton core at a cost of $500,000 of tax payer money.
|
|
VietVet
MUSA Council
Joined: May 15 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7008
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Aug 02 2014 at 3:20pm |
Bottom line to all of these examples of city dreams versus the real outcome........
The city was successful at demolishing many structures as mentioned. They are very good at destroying things. They are not worth a crap at replacing the destruction with any meaningful replacement efforts. The city dreams were a TOTAL FAILURE on carrying out the plans for a "train station" megaplex around the Charles St.-Central Ave.-Manchester Ave. area as to any building destinations when Kasich and company canceled the train coming to town. (remember the talk about horsedrawn carriage rides from the train station down Central to the "arts district"?) The Jacks Rec Center teardown never developed into the "Duncan Oil store creating jobs" idea either. This area with the vacant lot at Office Outfitters/Shamrock gas station and Jacks Rec Center is just another example of ill-conceived ideas that cleared land but left us nothing in return for all the money spent.
Ya know, we read periodically where Hamilton, our impoverished sister city to the south is making progress with their revitalization program and have brought many old buildings back to life with new, creative ideas. I just wonder why we don't have the creative ideas to do the same thing in this town and, better yet, see them to fruition. Better planning-smarter people-more creative......don't know, but they are beginning to pull away from us as we go around the race track on new development. How can they see success and our leaders screw up everything they touch? Hamilton is pulling itself up out of the ghetto image in some respects and Middletown seems to be sinking more each day. Why are the cities so different in results?
|
I'm so proud of my hometown and what it has become. Recall 'em all. Let's start over.
|
|
Bocephus
MUSA Citizen
Joined: Jun 04 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 838
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Aug 03 2014 at 2:02am |
They should spend some of that energy towards finding areas that could house new businesses and start trying to make our city more inviting to come here.
|
|
Richard Saunders
MUSA Resident
Joined: Jun 30 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 232
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Aug 03 2014 at 3:05am |
Oh, ye of little faith! Can't you see it? It shan't be long now until the genteel folk stroll 'round the Village Green; until young lovers spoon in the moonlight along the River Walk; and until the bourgeoisie sip wine in the many bistros and cafes. (But, it must be properly chilled!)
|
|