How will the
Middletown Council ever
conduct city business without Doug Adkins? Will they be able to pull
the wool off their eyes and get out from under a long list of
financial burdens which were authored by Adkins, passed under council
sheep noses and quickly bobble head approved? Council
and then Mayor
Mulligan were
working for Adkins.
Therefore Council was
in complete dereliction of duty … and
were in no way
representing their constituents. But
they were doing Doug
Adkins bidding! And they seemed sheepishly happy about it.
Ignorance
may be bliss
but it is not a good
defense.
In
the back of your mind, don’t you want to question just why it was
so easy for Adkins to hold such sway over Council??? One
counselor, like Adkins,
was a lawyer! Think
about it.
By
using
Council’s
dereliction
of duty, will Adkins now
shakedown
Middletown Council for
a large settlement for
wrongfully firing him
over
age discrimination? How
preposterous. Surely
this will be seen as a frivolous suit. He
has tried to pin his firing on Amy Vitori’s comment made in retort
to one of his
uncomplimentary comments
to
her. It
took him several weeks to decide how best to
gouge the city again. The
city may
already be
paying the court for
hearings and
fines for
violations of HUD regulations while
under Adkins direction.
Who
knows what else was
swept under the rug. There
have been inquiries about law suits against the city but the answer
for years on end has
been that its a
continuing case and is not available for public consumption. Notice
there was not a denial of law suits. Adkins
was careful to make Council complicit so no one wants to make
accusations possibly
detrimental to
themselves.
Sounds like the old
“catch 22”. I personally spoke with a newly elected council
member about an issue a few years ago. I
was told that Adkins
said
that city business
could not be discussed
with anyone
outside of council meetings and that councilors
could be prosecuted if
they
did. I felt the
councilor
was actually frightened. And
I got exactly nothing.
It
was sad the way Mr
Adkins kept
pompously stating
that “it is
my
job to inform, prepare
and instruct Council on every
issue” (all of which he initiates and
composes) “before
Council meetings.” That means that
none of his
time was
“wasted having to answer questions during
council meetings.” Adkins
wanted
to, in his words,
“conduct the City’s business … and go home.” And since
virtually everything was
done on emergency basis the public had
no chance to ask questions, make
suggestions or
objections, or get
clarification of the workings of our city government. Oh yeah, he
said
he would
answer questions before
or after council meetings,
depending on when you send him the “packet” (whatever
that is) and none of
those questions and answers, if
they existed, were
ever heard
by the public or recorded on YouTube. The obsessive need to keep
city government processes out of the public eye seems very suspect
and was a blatant
violation of The Sunshine Law. Discussion
or debate of city business seemed deliberately squelched.
Council
has forgotten, and even forgiven, that while he was Revitalization
Director he lost the management of and thereby any monetary gain
(millions of $’s in management fees) from the Section 8 housing
program. HUD took away control of the program from Adkins
and then city manager, Judy Gilleland, because (even after several
warnings) they refused to follow the rules. Neither one of them
showed up in court when they were subpoenaed by HUD’s
investigation. Then
Council gave Adkins
the City Manager position followed soon thereafter by a $25,000 a
year raise for giving
us a good screwing!
Adkins knew
that
City Council would be
responsible for everything, not him!
Why
would
Council
give such a dismal
failure a huge promotion and raise?
And the raises and
bonuses were piled on year after year.!!!
Adkins
left the city with terrible monetary loss
…(
1). City owned blight that will have to be torn down. Properties
were sold for a pittance to “investors” who agreed to, but failed
to rehab or re-purpose and then dumped them back on the city. At
times the city paid “investors” to take property. Some of the
properties were even bought back after years of abandonment. No time
limits or penalties for violating the agreements were in any sales
contracts. And Adkins says he’s a lawyer! Quite
the expert at accumulating losses.
(2).
Failure to manage
a growing population of drug addicts who
were bused in from Hamilton (partly
brought about by Doug’s
over expansion
of Section 8 housing).
Costs increased for OD treatment while Adkins reduced the number of
police and fire fighters
(and closed, and sold several firehouses) after getting a levy passed
for preventing just
such
reductions. (3).
Shrunken
tax base due to severe
reduction in low income housing that Adkins insisted on tearing down.
(4).
Inability to attract
industry & larger businesses that will provide jobs and bolster
our shrunken tax base;
the result of too
restrictive nonsensical building codes authored by Adkins. (5).
Loss of
the amenities that Adkins
was so eager to give
away, tear down or sell
at great loss … golf
course, swimming pools and parks!!! Then
there’s the new matter of the airport and Smith Park.
Will Council let Adkins
cause the loss of revenue there by remote control? His
fingerprints are all over this too~~~~~There’s
more but you can fill in the blanks and begin with the poor, poor,
very poor performance of our schools inside the very, very,
very expensive new
buildings. Adkins
should be paying Middletown for all the colossal
seemingly
purposeful blunders
he made! But he
will say that he was doing what council decided he
should do.
Remember how he
was the author of Council’s agenda and how he prepared and
instructed Council before
meeting? Did
Council make any decisions on their own?
------------- "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing" Edmond Burke
|