Middletown Ohio


Find us on
 Google+ and Facebook


 

Home | Yearly News Archive | Advertisers | Blog | Contact Us
Friday, March 29, 2024
FORUM CITY SCHOOLS COMMUNITY
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 5/6/2014 Council meeting
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

5/6/2014 Council meeting

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
 Rating: Topic Rating: 1 Votes, Average 5.00  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Mike_Presta View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: Apr 20 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3483
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mike_Presta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: 5/6/2014 Council meeting
    Posted: May 06 2014 at 5:17pm

Items of interest from this week’s city council workbook:

Page 18 of 87 [This item and the next are from the minutes of the Convention and Visitors Bureau’s 03/17/2014 meeting]:  “Discussion was held to share ideas on what we need to do to make the Canal District (new downtown name) as a Destination to bring people to the downtown. The Canal District area has been suggested to be from the Miami River to the railroad tracks.”

I guess this is the “new plan”, that is, to change the name of downtown.  Wasn’t it Shakespeare who said “A rose by any other name would smell as sweet”???  I guess that sewer gas by any other name would be as offensive.

2014 Grants: process if we should continue doing one time a year Grant Awards in Spring was discussed; it was decided that this should be an ongoing process … It was also decided that instead of calling it a Grant Award that we will call it Marketing Promotion package.”

As far as the CVB goes, a grant by any other name is still just a way to channel precious taxpayers’ dollars into pet projects!!!  These two items are typical of City Hall thinking.  Just change the name and we can fool the people into thinking we are trying something new.

Pages 21 and 22 of 87 [This item and the next are from the minutes of the Historic Commission’s 03/27/2014 meeting]:  “The Historical Society is now wanting to move forward with the project which involves the painting of a mural on the vinyl siding on the rear of the building and raised lettering for a sign attached to the vinyl siding. They are planning to paint the vinyl on the entire house. … Ms. Mejias asked if the mural would be considered to be a sign. Mr. Kohler said that designs that are official logos of an organization would be considered to be a sign, but the design submitted would be considered to be artwork…”

Typical working of the kangaroo court Historic commission!!!  If any outsider owned this building and was contemplating work on its exterior, they would be demanding that it be “restored” to its original historic splendor.  But, for the Historic Society, not only is the dreaded vinyl siding just peachy…PAINTED VINYL SIDING is okay, too!!!  File this under “When is a sign not a sign?”!!!

“The proposal is to install an electronic reader board where the clock is currently located that would scroll messages about events at Cincinnati State. Mr. Kohler noted that the downtown design standards recommends against scrolling or flashing sign messages. It does allow for stationary messages that can periodically change. After discussion it was agreed that the message could change every 10 seconds to allow for more extended messages.”

If I recall correctly, when @the Square (owned by an “outsider”) wanted to install such a sign, the Historic Commission’s answer was “NO WAY, NO HOW, NEVER, Not in THEIR downetowne!!” under threat of heavy fines and imprisonment!!!  I guess if the owner is an “insider” (such as Cinci State), it’s a whole different matter.  File this under “When is a scrolling sign not a scrolling sign?”!!!

Page 31 of 87:  This is the Staff Report for the South Main Street decorative lighting program.  What seems odd is the “FINANCIAL IMPACT” section.  The “FINANCIAL IMPACT” section of every other staff report that I can recall discusses the financial impact to THE CITY!!!  This one discusses only the financial impact to the residents of South Main Street.  It neglects to mention that THE CITY (which is actually WE, THE PEOPLE) will be on the hook every year until the end of time for about $6,000 in extra utilities and maintenance over and above what we would be paying with the regular street lights!!!

“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
Back to Top
Mike_Presta View Drop Down
MUSA Council
MUSA Council
Avatar

Joined: Apr 20 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3483
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mike_Presta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2014 at 5:42pm
It was interesting that Mayor Mulligan issued two proclamations at the start of the meeting, honoring 1) Corrections Officers, and 2) Police Officers.

As he handed them the plaques, did they notice the knife in his other hand as Council is ready to CUT the number of police officers on our force???

Yet we continue to spend millions on items like highway interchange beautification, welcome signs to downtown, decorative lights, and the like.

Did you EVER choose to take a highway exit based solely upon the flowers or similar "enhancements"???

ANYONE???
“Mulligan said he ... doesn’t believe they necessarily make the return on investment necessary to keep funding them.” …The Middletown Journal, January 30, 2012
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.084 seconds.
Copyright ©2024 MiddletownUSA.com    Privacy Statement  |   Terms of Use  |   Site by Xponex Media  |   Advertising Information